ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Gharddog03 · 1 June 2012, 10:28 AM

I have been itching for a new piece recently

. I own both the SubC and the GMTc but have been itching for a non ceramic version. I don't travel and I don't dive 1000ft. So your comments and opinions will be appreciated

Both are the same price and both in excellent condition and complete.

Sam Philip · 1 June 2012, 10:31 AM

I would get the GMT because you have 2 watches with a black bezel.

p_mcgee · 1 June 2012, 11:45 AM

I'd get the 16710, because with the pepsi or coke bezel it looks way different than the ceramic ones you already have. 16610 and 116610 look pretty similar IMO.

AJMarcus · 1 June 2012, 02:57 PM

You should consider a Daytona!

That certainly would,change things up.

View Poll Results: Sub Or GMT
16610 m	8	44.44%
16710 d	10	55.56%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

1 June 2012, 10:28 AM	#1
Gharddog03 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Genaro Location: Fresno Ca. Watch: R O L E X Posts: 4,466	16610 m vs 16710 d I have been itching for a new piece recently. I own both the SubC and the GMTc but have been itching for a non ceramic version. I don't travel and I don't dive 1000ft. So your comments and opinions will be appreciated Both are the same price and both in excellent condition and complete.

1 June 2012, 02:57 PM	#4
AJMarcus "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: AJ Location: USA Watch: Swiss Posts: 5,238	You should consider a Daytona!That certainly would,change things up.

1 June 2012, 10:31 AM	#2
Sam Philip Banned Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: UK Posts: 4,345	I would get the GMT because you have 2 watches with a black bezel.

1 June 2012, 11:45 AM	#3
p_mcgee "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Chicago Posts: 2,150	I'd get the 16710, because with the pepsi or coke bezel it looks way different than the ceramic ones you already have. 16610 and 116610 look pretty similar IMO.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)