ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

zama · 2 June 2012, 06:52 PM

I voted for the Tudor. I owned a Tudor before I owned a Rolex, I felt like I might have under done myself so to speak as I thought I wanted a Sub. In the end I could not see in my mind where the extra value was, and I liked the fact that the Tudor was less common, I went with the Tudor and I absolutely love it, clearly on this forum there is no second class citizen status for a Tudor owner.

I think if you like the style then go for both, and start withe the Tudor as they are less common. or maybe go the no date and then get a Black bay.

Either way you are going to get a great watch you will absolutely love. I feared i may want to trade up my Tudor one day to a Sub, now I don't feel that way at all, and when i did buy a Rolex it was a Datejust. Now i am interested in adding other brands PP, Breguet etc. If you plan to be a Rolex family only person then go with both, if you see yourself only ever owning one, I would go the Sub.

But i understand the torment went through the same thing myself.

JoeG · 2 June 2012, 07:48 PM

I agree with azguy

crew · 2 June 2012, 08:31 PM

I love the Tudor in blue.
I think the real question is "which one do I get first"?

HORNBLOWER · 2 June 2012, 08:38 PM

You may as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb, get both, I did and the hanging was worth it!!

bluemartinifan · 2 June 2012, 09:46 PM

Does price factor in at all? Likely an approx $1000 diference...

nowzen · 2 June 2012, 10:07 PM

I'd say be a man and listen to you're own gut instead of a bunch of strangers on the internet.

Frogman4me · 2 June 2012, 10:18 PM

For me Tudor Sub for sure

View Poll Results: Rolex 14060M or Tudor 79090 (Blue)
Rolex 14060M sub ND	69	80.23%
Tudor 79090 (blue)	17	19.77%
Voters: 86. You may not vote on this poll

2 June 2012, 06:52 PM	#31
zama "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Craig Location: Sydney Watch: 4 Broken glass Posts: 5,808	I voted for the Tudor. I owned a Tudor before I owned a Rolex, I felt like I might have under done myself so to speak as I thought I wanted a Sub. In the end I could not see in my mind where the extra value was, and I liked the fact that the Tudor was less common, I went with the Tudor and I absolutely love it, clearly on this forum there is no second class citizen status for a Tudor owner. I think if you like the style then go for both, and start withe the Tudor as they are less common. or maybe go the no date and then get a Black bay. Either way you are going to get a great watch you will absolutely love. I feared i may want to trade up my Tudor one day to a Sub, now I don't feel that way at all, and when i did buy a Rolex it was a Datejust. Now i am interested in adding other brands PP, Breguet etc. If you plan to be a Rolex family only person then go with both, if you see yourself only ever owning one, I would go the Sub. But i understand the torment went through the same thing myself. __________________ Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed..... Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze

2 June 2012, 07:48 PM	#32
JoeG "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Joe Location: New York Posts: 191	I agree with azguy Attached Images

2 June 2012, 10:07 PM	#36
nowzen "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 741	I'd say be a man and listen to you're own gut instead of a bunch of strangers on the internet. __________________ *Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons*

2 June 2012, 08:31 PM	#33
crew "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: John Location: Rochester/Naples Watch: Pepsi Posts: 18,307	I love the Tudor in blue. I think the real question is "which one do I get first"?

2 June 2012, 08:38 PM	#34
HORNBLOWER "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: Ben Location: Ireland Watch: 1 OR 2 Posts: 2,640	You may as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb, get both, I did and the hanging was worth it!!

2 June 2012, 09:46 PM	#35
bluemartinifan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Russ Location: Dallas Texas Watch: 5513 Posts: 2,124	Does price factor in at all? Likely an approx $1000 diference...

2 June 2012, 10:18 PM	#37
Frogman4me Banned Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Maryland Posts: 6,268	For me Tudor Sub for sure

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)