ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 July 2012, 08:26 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
|
I
Doesn't matter. When someone asks is this real and the date is obscured I say:
Run Forrest Run!
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13 |
7 July 2012, 09:17 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 381
|
Does seem quite a coincidence that the minute hand is perfectly placed over the date... What are the chances of that? 60:1?
|
7 July 2012, 01:05 PM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 116509,A21330,MVQV
Posts: 773
|
Hah, I didn't even notice that tidbit. I did wind up the watch a bit, though I didn't set the time or date.
Not only that: it's both the minute hand and the 24 hr hand over the date window. What are the odds of that? 1440:1? ;-) |
7 July 2012, 01:25 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Sandbox
Watch: ing your 6......
Posts: 1,379
|
Sounds like a good day for you to buy a lottery ticket.
__________________
. |
7 July 2012, 04:21 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
I feel people over rate wether a date fills the cyclops in pictures. I agree it can be camera angle or just an aftermarket glass, If the price is right, its a cheap easy fix if the rest if the watch is good. Regards.
__________________
watches many |
11 July 2012, 12:45 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: Looking for one...
Posts: 4
|
To OP, I think I saw this too when I passed by that little shop (next to the taco restaurant, right?) the other day...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.