ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 October 2007, 10:18 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
|
Weighed My Watches
This Rolex bug has gotten worse over the last month or two since joining this site. I went out and purchased a digital scale just to weigh my watches. It was nice high-end scale a lot like the ones the dope pushers use (I can hear the jokes about how I know what the doppers use). Very accurate and here are the results.
YM TT/YG 16623--140g SS SUB 16610----132g GMT Master Serti TT/YG 16753---111g DJ TT/YG JUB ToG 16253---97g DJ TT/WG JUB with Diamonds Face---96g Or put another way using the heaviest (YM) as the baseline: The Sub is 6% lighter than the YM. The GMT is 21% lighter than the YM. The DJ's are 32% lighter than the YM. |
30 October 2007, 10:22 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Jamal
Location: Dubai, U.A.E.
Posts: 862
|
Interesting.
Thanks for that. May I ask what kind of a scale did you use? I would like to know the difference between the SS YM and the SS GMT II c |
30 October 2007, 10:22 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Geeez, Bubba!
Some people here have waaaay too much time on their hands! Good job, Bubba!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
31 October 2007, 03:25 AM | #4 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
At least two of those weights are not very accurate. The TT YM weighs in at 146 grams (with all original links intact). The Sub-date 16610 should weigh 135 grams. Perhaps you've weighed them with one link taken off?
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
31 October 2007, 04:07 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
|
Quote:
You are correct. Good catch as I did not think about the missing links. YM=missing one link; SUB=missing one link; GMT missing one link; DJ's=each missing two links. |
|
31 October 2007, 05:19 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Dan
Location: ENGLAND
Watch: 116505
Posts: 1,587
|
Back to the drawing board
__________________
16710-116505-116660-116680-116610LV-216570-126331-116710-114060-126621-TudorGMT-Tudor BB58-Sapphire Speedy Pro-Speedy Rising Sun |
31 October 2007, 11:19 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: cali
Posts: 355
|
how much should my Daytona SS weigh? oh, and my WG Daytona (116509)/
|
31 October 2007, 03:54 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,528
|
Thats called precision without accuracy.
__________________
E |
31 October 2007, 08:37 PM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,917
|
excellent, useless information! BTW, has anyone measured the difference in weight in their trouser pockets before and after they purchased one of those beauties?
|
31 October 2007, 10:09 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
|
GEEEEZ.....this is the reason some of us should have unlimited time to edit their posts. One of the few times I try to be serious and see what happens. Shot down by JJ! I have a Nicko Hacko pun, but I will refrain. I gave the scale back to the drug dealers where it will be put to better, and more accurate, use.
|
1 November 2007, 02:03 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Ft.Worth, Texas
Posts: 488
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.