ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 September 2012, 01:53 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Peter
Location: Perth
Posts: 176
|
Uh oh
Just had another look at the GMTIIC , always thought it was too similar to the Expl.2 - now not so sure. Looks real sweet in pictures - worth a shot ? I can always change my order to a GMTIIC. I read here that the accuracy is better on the GMTIIC vs Sub. BTW no issue at all with my Expl.2 , amazing accuracy |
23 September 2012, 04:44 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Andy
Location: East Midlands, UK
Watch: Patek and Rolex
Posts: 1,074
|
Both my SubC and ExpII 42 are very accurate, so wouldn't get the GMTIIC just for that reason. You need to try both on to really decide which you prefer. Do you like PCL's? Do you prefer a cleaner looking dial with no date? Do you like a busier bezel? I think the vote on here is split between sub vs GMT. I tried both on and loved them equally, but the Sub just won the day. Can't go wrong with either.
|
24 September 2012, 09:43 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Peter
Location: Perth
Posts: 176
|
Thank's Andy,
I think I'll go with the Sub. Now the wait starts, AD said delivery between now - November |
24 September 2012, 11:03 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Willie
Location: Parkland,Fl.
Posts: 4,829
|
Good choice, congrats
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.