Subamariner non cermaic vs ceramic

[daves]

as above any photos of them side by side which is best im about to buy my first rolex but cant deside which one


im going for steel with black dial or the green hulk date or non

They have a steel black dial submariner ceramic in no date in my local ad £5000 so im in two minds and just want to know what you think

[mannyv11]

I have had both and I enjoy the sub ceramic so much more. The glidelock clasp is amazing I also love the shine on the ceramic over the aluminum insert. Some like the old some like the new, you really just have to decide for yourself which one you enjoy the most. Go to an AD try the subC on and see if it sings to you.

[The GMT Master]

The Sub C has a better bracelet, but the shininess detracts from it's utility as a dive watch. The previous Sub (assuming we're talking about the non-date) is probably the last of the Rolex tool-watches, but I don't think it's the definitive Submariner. If you want the best Submariner, you have to go vintage, or look elsewhere - I think the Tudor Pelagos is more "Sub-like" than the current Submariner

[daves]

I have tried on both just need some more surport i love the new one but i do have a small wrist. So im in two minds as i do like big watches as look more manley but i have a ladies wrist.

[dazzpowder]

Had them both and couldn't get used to the square look and the way the shoulders tailed in to the bracelet on the ceramic sub. Sold them both and bought the last of the old series, which for me has the classic sub lines. I also bought the later bracelet so I have the best of both worlds minus the ceramic dial whic I do like.

[travis0306]

Here are 5513 non ceramic and 116610 ceramic.

[wuyeah]

I like new case design, not big fan of ceramic. If I must pick, I'll pick ceramic.

[77T]

I like the metal bezel insert. I'd focus there for my first one...

[wokafu]

Originally Posted by travis0306

Here are 5513 non ceramic and 116610 ceramic.

some how the 5513 looks bigger on you...maybe its just me...opps...i forgot to vote for OP....hmmmm..tough one for me...i'll choose the subc with date....?ND version i prefer the non ceramic...

[esm]

The 16610LV is by far my fave Sub so far

[elijahenoch]

Originally Posted by esm

The 16610LV is by far my fave Sub so far

Nice pictures !

[sdg1871]

If you're talking about the bluesy I much much much prefer the old-style which is why I bought it over the ceramic one.



However if you are a fan of the black I think I like the ceramic one better Although I must admit I prefer the black GMT Master II over the black Sub.

If you're into green I just love the ceramic Hulk over the old LV. To me, green is a little flamboyant to begin with so if you going to go green go whole hog :)

[esm]

Originally Posted by sdg1871

If you're talking about the bluesy and much much much prefer the old-style which is why I bought it over the ceramic one

Goo point. The OP was not clear on whether he was after form or functionality.....

[floater156]

I've tried them both on at the same time and I didn't see a huge difference. From 10 feet away they looked basically the same to me.

[esm]

Originally Posted by floater156

I've tried them both on at the same time and I didn't see a huge difference. From 10 feet away they looked basically the same to me.

To be fair though, it's be same for every Sub for the past 50+ years.

Some say that is the beauty of it. Only you know what you have on your wrist

[DolphinV8]

LN wise, I prefer 116610.
Tough call if choosing between 16610LV and 116610LN.

[daves]

Great photos i want both now

[Rags]

I prefer the aluminum bezel over the ceramic but I prefer the glidelock bracelet over the original. I wish I could order a glidelock for my 16610.

[Solo118]

Every owner has their preference. Personally, I prefer the newer Ceramic model as I owned both Sub Dates plus a 14060m.

[WatchTimes]

I have a 6.8 in wrist and I thought
I would not like the Sub-C but ended up taking on in trade
a few mths back (I have since moved it) but have to tell you
I was REALLY impressed! Great watch, very comfortable, wore
very well!!!

I do not think you can go wrong with either, the new bracelet is really something though!!

[samuel019]

Originally Posted by Rags

I prefer the aluminum bezel over the ceramic but I prefer the glidelock bracelet over the original. I wish I could order a glidelock for my 16610.

Loving my 16610. But loving the glidelock on my 216570. Wish I could do the same

[samuel019]

Maybe one day I will get the 116610 so I can have mother/father like my Explorers.

[esm]

Originally Posted by samuel019

Loving my 16610. But loving the glidelock on my 216570. Wish I could do the same

Did you add a glidelock clasp to a 216570?

[TheCanadian1]

Try on both and decide. Both would be great. I would go with ceramic.

[samuel019]

Originally Posted by esm

Did you add a glidelock clasp to a 216570?

No I was referring to the band on my Exp II, 216570. Wishing I had a band like the one on my Explorer on my Sub 16610.

[RRsDJ]

Originally Posted by sdg1871

Man I love the Blue SS/YG Sub!!

[Jefyulo]

Non ceramic for smaller wrists, but you can't really go wrong with either.


------------------
"Time is money, so I bought a Rolex."

[Chad072]

[AF_Rob]

If you want a classic, go non-ceramic. It wears more comforable to me. The transition from the lugs to the bracelet looks more smooth. Plus, replacing the bezel insert will run you under $100, where the ceramic will run you several hundred. The hollow links also make it lighter. But, some members feel it makes the bracelet seem cheap.

However, the newer model has several upgrades that you can clearly see from the wonderful pictures provided by other members. To include solid end links, and an improved clasp. The dial has also recieved an upgrade you can clearly see. The case is also a little beefier, if that's your thing.

Me, I wanted a classic and I don't mind what comes with it. It suits me better. It seems more casual, like me. The ceramic bezel gives it a bit of "flash". Lucky for me, I was able to snag the last one at the AD before the newer No-date Subs came out. It suits me better. But I do agree that overall the newer model is a better watch when i set all my biases aside.

[Transient]

Classic non ceramic all the way mate....16610!!