ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
7 January 2013, 06:55 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: England
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 643
|
Rolex have created a problem here. The new one obviously has a better bracelet and case. However, the new blue is absolutely horrible. I can't get used to it. The blue on the old model is a thousand times better. Therefore I would pick the 16613.
|
7 January 2013, 07:34 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: So. California
Posts: 451
|
Love the old. But you can not go wrong with either.
|
8 January 2013, 05:27 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 1
|
I had the same issue. I went old 16613 as well because of the prismatic, starbust, iridescent quality of the blue on the dial. I am still happy I didn't go 116613 yet I managed to have buyer’s remorse all the same. When I went 16613 I didn't know enough about the revision history and I ended up buying a 2002. I knew enough to purchase a Rolex with the gold through the clasp but it wasn't until after having my Submariner for a couple weeks that I learned of the year to year changes. Had I known more while shopping I would have bought a 2004 or later with “no holes in case” or a post 2007 “no holes in case” and “Inner Bezel Engraving”.
|
9 January 2013, 12:41 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 2,300
|
old
|
9 January 2013, 03:01 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,196
|
I have the older. It's up to you.
|
10 January 2013, 02:13 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
|
__________________
Best George "Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston --------------------- *new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new * http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ IG @passionata1 |
12 January 2013, 10:57 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 600
|
|
9 January 2013, 02:31 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: new hampshire
Posts: 41
|
new one
|
10 January 2013, 01:33 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Sergio
Location: Miami
Watch: Lv,gmtc,ym,dayton
Posts: 260
|
Old one not a big fan of the new dial
|
10 January 2013, 01:35 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 1,447
|
I definitely prefer the blue of the older model. JMO.
|
10 January 2013, 04:06 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 118
|
anyone think the price of the old subs will rise due to the new ones colour being not as great
or do you think rolex will smarten up and just release the new sub with the old colour? that makes sense to me, if they dont ever do that I figure the old ones would be a great watch to keep forever or resale for possible profit oneday but if everyove loves the old ones colour so much i am sure rolex will release that same blue again, dont see why they changed it in the first place,,,,any thoughts? |
10 January 2013, 04:08 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,515
|
I dont think Rolex is gonna change the color back. Once Rolex makes a product, they stick to it. I know the old blue is a classic and a rising star as far as I am concerned.
|
10 January 2013, 04:12 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Sergio
Location: Miami
Watch: Lv,gmtc,ym,dayton
Posts: 260
|
You can pick up a z-d blue for 5500-6000 with all the links good condition
|
11 January 2013, 10:14 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 118
|
QUICK QUESTION
has anyone tried both watches??? is the new one a lottt bigger like in pics doesnt look too much bigger,,,since the faces are the same its just the lugs,,bands the same is it a substantial difference,,,im buying the old one and havent seen it in person seen the new one and the blue isnt as bad as the pics on line to be honest but it didnt seem so big or anything just hoping the old one isnt too small lol WHats the weight difference? thanks guys |
10 March 2013, 04:05 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: 1738 mi to Vegas
Watch: 16613, 116710LN
Posts: 234
|
Quote:
For me, once side-by-side OLD is the better looking watch. Just no comparing that blue. |
|
11 January 2013, 12:16 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Junkyard Dog
Location: The Doghouse
Watch: I can't tell time
Posts: 6,822
|
The new one feels more substantial; however, the new blue is not nearly as captivating as the old, traditional blue.
|
11 January 2013, 12:16 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Junkyard Dog
Location: The Doghouse
Watch: I can't tell time
Posts: 6,822
|
And yes I have tried both.
|
11 January 2013, 01:23 PM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Manassas,Virginia
Watch: Ol'Bluesy & Hulk
Posts: 2,871
|
I have the old blue, circa 1996 model. Love the color, just about the perfect shade pleasing to the eye. Bought it new and will probably keep it forever!
|
11 January 2013, 02:09 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CA
Watch: Wife says too many
Posts: 348
|
Older one is a classic and must have for any collection - personally not a fan of the new look. Enjoy your choice though
__________________
------------------------------------------------------ " I prefer to drink; not drive " John Alec Entwistle |
12 January 2013, 05:31 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Id buy the new one and swap in the old dial for the perfect tt sub.
|
12 January 2013, 06:12 AM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
|
16613 hands down!!
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal... on a fairly irrelevant social media site that falsely inflates my fragile ego" |
12 January 2013, 07:25 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Pat
Location: North East
Watch: YG Yachtmaster
Posts: 202
|
Congratulations on going with the old brilliant blue dial.
Could it be thet Rolex could not match the old color in ceramic? |
12 January 2013, 09:30 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NJ & FL
Posts: 168
|
Anyone want to buy my old, so I can buy new?????
|
12 January 2013, 10:28 AM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,850
|
Back when I first noticed Rolex it was the 16613 that absolutely blew my socks off.
Still does. Every time! I already have No.3 planned but if there is a No. 4 it will be a 16613. I like to see others going for the 116613 however as it should mean more 16613s to choose from when I am ready.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch. Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..." |
9 March 2013, 04:16 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Kauai
Watch: 1675-1680-16750
Posts: 3,346
|
It seems like the new ones have a lighter shade of blue. The older ones seem more bluesy, richer blue. Thoughts?
|
9 March 2013, 05:34 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Greece
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 267
|
|
9 March 2013, 11:38 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: James
Location: Michigan
Watch: 116613LB
Posts: 861
|
I just ordered a new one so that gets my vote.
|
10 March 2013, 02:39 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here!
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,366
|
The old one by far!!! I sold my old and and bought the new one
Hated myself. So I sold the new style and again bought the old style but BNIB and am so happy Now I have the new one but in black dial Confused yet? Bottom line: Blue on the new is not as nice as the blue on the old
__________________
16610LN | 16613LB | 16710 Pepsi | 118238 | 116500 (White) | 116500 (Black) | 116710BLNR | 116610LV "The one thing I fear most is time; time waits for no one and leaves no options."
|
10 March 2013, 04:09 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Penna
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,658
|
New for me. But I have all new subs
__________________
Rolex Sub-126610LV Rolex Sub- 126613LB Rolex GMT BLRO 126710 Rolex GMT BLNR Rolex Datejust 16220 |
10 March 2013, 04:25 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: My overnight bag
Watch: 16613 & 116710BLNR
Posts: 572
|
Old!
I know it's human nature to be resistant to change, but after looking the new one over many times in the local ADs, I simply don't like the color. Period. If they would have kept the old color, it would be a no-brainer upgrade. Now, my 16613 really is a classic. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.