ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 December 2012, 01:13 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: London UK
Posts: 10
|
Submariner Problem?
This is my first post and it will show that I am no Rolex expert!
I recently bought a Sub 16610[1991] from a reputable internet site, based on description and photographs. It seemed to tick all the boxes until I spotted that the top of the winding crown is a gold colour rather than steel - this is only the raised circle with the crown logo and three balls. Viewing with a loupe it seems as if the whole winding crown has been capped with a white metal and is in fact a gold-coloured metal below and the capping has worn off on the top. From a quick web search I see that all triplock crowns should be solid stainless steel. Have I been sold a wrong'un? I'd be surprised as the vendor site prides itself on authenticity. Any advice would be gratefully received. All the best Gordon |
20 December 2012, 02:01 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,733
|
Submariner crowns are not capped with white metals.
Sounds loke you have a fake where the brass base metal comes thru after the chromeplating has been worn off But we need pics to give a better reply. |
20 December 2012, 02:10 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Greg
Location: PA
Watch: me burn
Posts: 1,435
|
does not sound encouraging. please post some pics.
__________________
Motocross is life! |
20 December 2012, 02:27 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
__________________
|
20 December 2012, 02:47 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
|
20 December 2012, 02:55 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Madrid (Spain)
Posts: 702
|
You might be lucky enough to have an aftermarket crown on a genuine sub. Who knows! Please post pics.
|
20 December 2012, 03:16 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Canada
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 2,080
|
Sounds like it may be fake but agree need pic.
|
20 December 2012, 04:37 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Zürich
Watch: Submariner 5512
Posts: 922
|
Pics!!! How should we advise you without pics?
|
20 December 2012, 08:48 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
|
Not sounding good. Pics please.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13 |
20 December 2012, 09:00 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 3,241
|
Where is this great reputable internet site?
|
20 December 2012, 09:29 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
Not good need pics
__________________
watches many |
20 December 2012, 11:36 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Michael
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Watch: Exp II
Posts: 616
|
doesn't sound good! Hope it works out----
|
20 December 2012, 12:21 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Russ N.
Location: Western N.C. USA
Watch: 116718 PP & B Bay
Posts: 323
|
If that seller is in Miami (NOT Tempoking by the way-Mr. A is great!) and lists on ebay and a website I shared your pain several years ago.
|
20 December 2012, 12:26 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Heath
Location: Lawrenceburg KY
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 3,982
|
__________________
“You may delay, but time will not.” ― Benjamin Franklin |
20 December 2012, 12:54 PM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,010
|
Hope the OP has a good Sub - and that the previous owner had it serviced by a guy who used aftermarket part(s)...
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
20 December 2012, 04:00 PM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,125
|
__________________
Quote:
|
|
20 December 2012, 06:41 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,125
|
The OP is correct. The Rolex winding crown isn't solid stainless steel, but it is heavily chrome plated over brass(?) . I once had a desirable vintage Rolex big crown for vintage Rolex Submariner 6538, and the chrome was wearing down to the base exposing the brass(?) part of the crown. Still, I got huge money for it and the buyer had to restore by re-chroming it. I have several Rolex crowns in my possession, and let me see if I can find one with the chrome wearing down.
Edit: I located 2 gold Rolex crowns and one of them is for the DateJust. As you can see, it is gold capped rather than solid gold and these have worn down to the base. The same heavily chrome plated or "capping" principal applies to the steel crowns as well. I will look for a worn down steel crown later. Sorry for the poor pictures as I don't have good lighting at night.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
20 December 2012, 08:30 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: London UK
Posts: 10
|
Thank you all for the speedy and helpful replies. Thanks especially to U5512 for taking the time to root through his crowns, it has put my mind at rest somewhat.
I will try to take some decent pics and post them later. Rest assured it did not come from EBay but from a UK based supplier with a good reputation so I should have no difficulty in returning the watch should that become necessary. Thanks again Gordon in London UK |
20 December 2012, 09:41 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Madrid (Spain)
Posts: 702
|
I do not understand fully. What you are saying is that for gold crowns they use a stainless steel base with gold capping ad for stainless steel, instead of using solid stainless steel they use a brass base with chrome plating? Sounds a little odd, doesn´t it?
|
20 December 2012, 09:53 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
does no one have the courtesy to say hello and introduce them selves first,,,,,
i thought it was the done thing on any forum to have a first post as a hello , then ask what ever springs to mind. so welcome to the forum , i think a pic will be needed of the watch and the crown , hope you get the answers your hoping for , hope you enjoy the forum. |
21 December 2012, 01:41 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: London UK
Posts: 10
|
Dysondiver is quite correct - to introduce myself, I am a retired architect based in London, UK. This is my third Rolex over the years, previously having owned an 80's Oysterquartz and more recently a new Explorer I. My only other notable watch is a Breitling Top Time which I bought new in 1969 for £30.00! Still going strong as well.
Something I did not mention previously is that the lume on the hands and markers no longer 'lumes' and I understand that this would be expected of a 1991 watch using Tritium. The 'pearl' still lumes, however. I've attached some poor pics which will hopefully give you a better idea of the watch and the crown in particular. Thanks Gordon |
21 December 2012, 04:24 AM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,125
|
Whatever base that Rolex used for the crowns, I don't know. It could be brass, bronze, copper, platinum, whatever. But surely the crowns aren't solid stainless steel or gold; they're capped.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
21 December 2012, 05:39 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
While I agree with Mickey it can peel off. But generally the gold cappped crowns not the steel ones
__________________
watches many |
21 December 2012, 08:31 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
|
The modern gold crowns have a steel insert. Otherwise the threads would strip.
Stainless steel crowns are solid stainless steel.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13 |
22 December 2012, 09:33 AM | #25 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,125
|
Quote:
OK, what we have here is a steel crown for the DateJust and it's worn down to the base. What you see is clearly a chrome layer which has been capped to the base. If i have to guess the thickness of the chrome, it is probably somewhere between 100 - 150 microns. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX You're now looking at the stem side of the crown, and you can clearly see the capped chrome around the crown's perimeter. Next time when you're at your watchmaker's facility for repair of your Rolex, have a look at the stem side of your crown. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
__________________
Quote:
|
||
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.