ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Dan Pierce · 1 September 2007, 06:35 AM

Very interesting. Not sure I would do it. Then again, not sure I wouldn't.

My first choice is to stay all original. But I don't mind a mix & match with real Rolex components. I've seen pics of a GMT [16710] with the new style jubilee, a GMT with a new Daytona bracelet, and the new GMT with brushed center links.
Kinda like it. Time would tell if it stayed like that.
Thanks for sharing your experience and pics.

dP

Dan Pierce · 1 September 2007, 06:37 AM

Ok, I take that back.................I like it.

dP

Andad · 1 September 2007, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mic6

horrible

Sorry Chad,

I have to agree on this one.

Andad · 1 September 2007, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leopardprey

Some photos of my modified TT GMT II. Really liking this setup!

It is going to stay this way! Like the brushed SS Bracelet, combined with the TT Dial and Bezel. And the TT Clasp on the opposite side.

Very comfortable as well!

Chad,

Why mess around with a perfect Rolex when you are buying an SS gmt backup?

Flyjet601 · 1 September 2007, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directioneng

Chad,

Why mess around with a perfect Rolex when you are buying an SS gmt backup?

Chad I have to agree...its like taking the Mona Lisa and painting a bikini on her

The TT GMT is just that TT! It is the perfect blend.

But I admire your creativity...always have and always will

cphone · 17 December 2007, 04:43 PM

does that mean that any brushed SS oyster bracelet (eg. GMT II 16710) would fit the GMT IIc in place of its polished bracelet?

I thought the lug spacings are wider apart?

johan · 17 December 2007, 04:45 PM

if you love it... thats all matter... cheers.

vukotab · 18 December 2007, 12:12 AM

I would never do that.Not because I think it`s ugly(it isn`t,it looks o.k.),but because I don`t like messin` with such pieces as Rolex.
But,if YOU like it,then it`s great!That is only important,so wear it in a good health!

1 September 2007, 06:35 AM	#31
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,216	Very interesting. Not sure I would do it. Then again, not sure I wouldn't. My first choice is to stay all original. But I don't mind a mix & match with real Rolex components. I've seen pics of a GMT [16710] with the new style jubilee, a GMT with a new Daytona bracelet, and the new GMT with brushed center links. Kinda like it. Time would tell if it stayed like that. Thanks for sharing your experience and pics. dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

1 September 2007, 06:37 AM	#32
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,216	Ok, I take that back.................I like it. dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

17 December 2007, 04:43 PM	#36
cphone "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Under the sky Posts: 8	does that mean that any brushed SS oyster bracelet (eg. GMT II 16710) would fit the GMT IIc in place of its polished bracelet? I thought the lug spacings are wider apart?

17 December 2007, 04:45 PM	#37
johan "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Johan Location: vancouver Watch: rolex, Posts: 194	if you love it... thats all matter... cheers.

18 December 2007, 12:12 AM	#38
vukotab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Vukota Brajovi Location: Belgrade,Serbia Watch: ing movies! Posts: 3,812	I would never do that.Not because I think it`s ugly(it isn`t,it looks o.k.),but because I don`t like messin` with such pieces as Rolex. But,if YOU like it,then it`s great!That is only important,so wear it in a good health!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)