ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jshepard · 3 January 2013, 10:23 AM

Get the explorer 1, notice you couldn't find any cons? Haha

jlc123 · 4 January 2013, 07:23 AM

I have fantastic news to report, after my potential deal seemed completely dead and it magically sprung back to life. I no have the money in my paypal account and the watch is in the mail. My first Rolex is near!

andyol1966 · 4 January 2013, 07:29 AM

Great news. Have you gone for the Exp 2?

jlc123 · 4 January 2013, 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andyol1966

Great news. Have you gone for the Exp 2?

I haven't decided yet, but the sub is back in the running now. I just can't pick. I will keep everyone posted.

andyol1966 · 4 January 2013, 07:36 AM

Good luck with the choice, both are great watches...look forward to seeing the pics

Tri-Tip · 4 January 2013, 07:37 AM

I'd go for the Sub, it's the Iconic Rolex Sports model.

Although, that's what I have and now I'm jonesing for the Exp II Polar.

jamesbondOO7 · 4 January 2013, 07:55 AM

The Explorer II is a very good watch. It does everything: date and GMT, is very comfortable, rugged and a bit uncommon.

FiftyTwoEighty · 4 January 2013, 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7

The Explorer II is a very good watch. It does everything: date and GMT, is very comfortable, rugged and a bit uncommon.

2x

Every reason I picked up a Exp II.

At the end of the day, you've got two great choices ahead of you.

jlc123 · 4 January 2013, 02:26 PM

It is with great pleasure that I inform the forum that I have just become a Rolex owner. Which one did I get? You'll have to wait and see...

mmmk604 · 4 January 2013, 02:30 PM

I wouldn't call the sub flashy at all.

I would get the Explorer or ND Sub. I have 6.5" wrists too and wear 36mm-40mm watches.

psv · 4 January 2013, 02:30 PM

Go classic and classy. As much as I like big and modern watches, this one never fails: 114270

samuel019 · 4 January 2013, 02:37 PM

I love all 3. For obvious reasons. Lol. The Exp I gets the most wrist time though. It's very comfortable and classy.

111forza · 5 January 2013, 09:32 AM

:

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlc123

I just struck a deal and should have the funds for my first Rolex within a few hours

. So my options are:
Explorer 14270 or 114270:
Pros-
Classic
Good size for my 6.5 inch wrist
Black dial to go with my white dial JLC
Understated
Easy to find under 4k
Pros-
Explorer 2 16570 Polar:
Stunning
GMT is useful and its nice to have a complication
Understated
Moderately easy to find under 4k
Cons-
Cyclops
No Date Sub:
Pros-
Classic
Beautiful
THE Rolex
Cons-
Flashy
Common
Hard to find under 4k
Right now I'm leaning towards an Explorer, either one. Which would you guys pick with a strict 4k USD budget? Thanks and Happy New Year!!!

Classic

4 January 2013, 07:55 AM	#37
jamesbondOO7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: BondJamesBond Location: The Algarve Watch: Rolex or nothing Posts: 4,081	The Explorer II is a very good watch. It does everything: date and GMT, is very comfortable, rugged and a bit uncommon. __________________ ♛ 5-digit Rolex or nothing ♛

4 January 2013, 02:37 PM	#42
samuel019 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Real Name: Anthony Location: Triad Watch: Me go broke!!!! Posts: 4,038	I love all 3. For obvious reasons. Lol. The Exp I gets the most wrist time though. It's very comfortable and classy. __________________ Rolex Collection: A few here and there. Just ask

3 January 2013, 10:23 AM	#31
jshepard "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: USA Watch: GMTII Posts: 1,180	Get the explorer 1, notice you couldn't find any cons? Haha

4 January 2013, 07:23 AM	#32
jlc123 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: United States Watch: Overseas Posts: 992	I have fantastic news to report, after my potential deal seemed completely dead and it magically sprung back to life. I no have the money in my paypal account and the watch is in the mail. My first Rolex is near!

4 January 2013, 07:29 AM	#33
andyol1966 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: East Midlands, UK Watch: Patek and Rolex Posts: 1,074	Great news. Have you gone for the Exp 2?

4 January 2013, 07:36 AM	#35
andyol1966 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: East Midlands, UK Watch: Patek and Rolex Posts: 1,074	Good luck with the choice, both are great watches...look forward to seeing the pics

4 January 2013, 07:37 AM	#36
Tri-Tip "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: CA, USA Watch: Out!!! Posts: 6,474	I'd go for the Sub, it's the Iconic Rolex Sports model. Although, that's what I have and now I'm jonesing for the Exp II Polar.

4 January 2013, 02:26 PM	#39
jlc123 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: United States Watch: Overseas Posts: 992	It is with great pleasure that I inform the forum that I have just become a Rolex owner. Which one did I get? You'll have to wait and see...

4 January 2013, 02:30 PM	#40
mmmk604 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Canada Watch: 116610LN Posts: 1,594	I wouldn't call the sub flashy at all. I would get the Explorer or ND Sub. I have 6.5" wrists too and wear 36mm-40mm watches.

4 January 2013, 02:30 PM	#41
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,078	Go classic and classy. As much as I like big and modern watches, this one never fails: 114270

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)