The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 December 2012, 04:57 AM   #1
cvogue
"TRF" Member
 
cvogue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 28
Which movements respond to positioning for regulation?

I've got a ~1981 DJ with (I believe) a 3035 movement in it. It gains time (about 7-8 seconds a day) so I've been trying placing it in different positions at night to slow it down. According to the conventional wisdom (and the sheet of paper Rolex put in the box with some watches) setting the watch vertically with the crown pointed up should slow it down the most.

This doesn't work for mine... but then I tried putting it crystal down overnight and instead of gaining 3-4 seconds it only gained 1-2... woo-hoo!

Does anybody know if there's a more comprehensive set of movement/positioning info out there? I've heard the newer movements don't respond much at all to nighttime position.

Any insight appreciated.
cvogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2012, 05:15 AM   #2
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
The positions favor losing seconds more so than gaining a lot of seconds.

1. To gain a few seconds: Lay the watch flat with the dial uppermost.

2. To lose a few seconds: Lay the watch vertically with the winding-button downwards.

3. To lose rather more seconds: Lay the watch vertically with the winding-button uppermost.

This works for movements designed with the same component layouts. The newer microstella balances have better adjustment options for your watchmaker - maybe let him/her look at it?
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2012, 09:05 AM   #3
handsfull
"TRF" Member
 
handsfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
Positional variance seems to be consistent with the newer Rolex movements. The 3186, 3135, and 3136 movement's in my current pieces have nearly the same result when placed in the same positions....
handsfull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2012, 09:27 AM   #4
cvogue
"TRF" Member
 
cvogue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by 77T View Post
The positions favor losing seconds more so than gaining a lot of seconds.

1. To gain a few seconds: Lay the watch flat with the dial uppermost.

2. To lose a few seconds: Lay the watch vertically with the winding-button downwards.

3. To lose rather more seconds: Lay the watch vertically with the winding-button uppermost.

This works for movements designed with the same component layouts. The newer microstella balances have better adjustment options for your watchmaker - maybe let him/her look at it?
Yeah I'm debating to take it in or not. I just got it so I don't want to have it serviced yet... so I'd like to take it to a local person. Have gotten a few recommendations.
cvogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2012, 09:29 AM   #5
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Microstella adjustment takes a few minutes. Not a big deal.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2012, 09:32 PM   #6
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by cvogue View Post
I've got a ~1981 DJ with (I believe) a 3035 movement in it. It gains time (about 7-8 seconds a day) so I've been trying placing it in different positions at night to slow it down. According to the conventional wisdom (and the sheet of paper Rolex put in the box with some watches) setting the watch vertically with the crown pointed up should slow it down the most.

This doesn't work for mine... but then I tried putting it crystal down overnight and instead of gaining 3-4 seconds it only gained 1-2... woo-hoo!

Does anybody know if there's a more comprehensive set of movement/positioning info out there? I've heard the newer movements don't respond much at all to nighttime position.

Any insight appreciated.
No matter the position the variables would be only + - a second or so, and its mostly the low beat movements like the 15 series this applies to the most.The 3 series is not effected so much but like every thing mechanical there will be some that are and some not.Myself would be quite happy with 7-8 seconds a day as long as its pretty consistent thats the most important consistency.And even at your bottom of the scale 8 seconds its still 99.992% accurate which is a tiny bit off the COSC spec.Myself would wait till normal full service time then it will regulated, just cannot see any point in getting the back off a watch for say 2-3 seconds out of 86400 in a day.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2012, 02:22 AM   #7
TimeOnMyHands
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: 16570
Posts: 457
My 3186 (Explorer II) responds very well to a crown down resting position to 'bleed off' a couple of seconds nightly. Very impressed!
TimeOnMyHands is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2012, 02:41 AM   #8
tifosi
"TRF" Member
 
tifosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
My Sub-C was running a little slowly for the past 1.5 years or so. Maybe around -6 sec. per day. Then I realised that I was resting it crown up during the night. I started laying it dial up 3 days ago and now it is -1 for the past 3 days total. I'll see how the full week averages out, but as of right now the results are good.
__________________
Russ
tifosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2012, 04:23 AM   #9
alanc
"TRF" Member
 
alanc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Alan
Location: Connecticut
Watch: 114270 16710B
Posts: 1,062
My Exp was losing five seconds a day until I positioned it face up (had been on edge crown up). That brought it down to a loss of 2 seconds/day. Now, in addition to that, I give it 20 winds or so every other day, even though I wear it daily.

It now loses about 2 seconds per week. Amazing.
alanc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2012, 06:58 AM   #10
cvogue
"TRF" Member
 
cvogue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
No matter the position the variables would be only + - a second or so, and its mostly the low beat movements like the 15 series this applies to the most.The 3 series is not effected so much but like every thing mechanical there will be some that are and some not.Myself would be quite happy with 7-8 seconds a day as long as its pretty consistent thats the most important consistency.And even at your bottom of the scale 8 seconds its still 99.992% accurate which is a tiny bit off the COSC spec.Myself would wait till normal full service time then it will regulated, just cannot see any point in getting the back off a watch for say 2-3 seconds out of 86400 in a day.
Yeah I don't think it's worth messing with really, until a full service which will be a few years!
cvogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2012, 07:10 AM   #11
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
I prefer a watch that's fast rather than slow. I'd rather it be fast 3 seconds a day than slow 1 or 2 seconds. It's just easier to synch back up to your reference when it's a little fast.

My 16610 Sub seems to respond to positioning more so than my newer 6 digit model GMT, which doesn't seem affected much at all from positioning.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2012, 11:01 PM   #12
tifosi
"TRF" Member
 
tifosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by tifosi View Post
My Sub-C was running a little slowly for the past 1.5 years or so. Maybe around -6 sec. per day. Then I realised that I was resting it crown up during the night. I started laying it dial up 3 days ago and now it is -1 for the past 3 days total. I'll see how the full week averages out, but as of right now the results are good.
After one week of laying the watch dial up at night my SubC is -5sec. for the entire week! A far cry from the -6sec daily I was getting resting it crown up at night.
__________________
Russ
tifosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 08:52 AM   #13
DetroitDave
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Guess where...
Posts: 22
It seems my 16613 will gain bout 3 minutes and then hold....possible or am I just losing my mind?
DetroitDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 10:19 AM   #14
Rolexalex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Romania
Posts: 2
I'm new here, I have the same problem .. -25 seconds in 4 days. Hopefully this (with face up) will help. I will check and let you know. Thank you!
Rolexalex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2013, 12:32 PM   #15
Bulldurham08
"TRF" Member
 
Bulldurham08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Kyle
Location: PA
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 404
As most have said, with my SubC, at night I'm usually able to get or keep the watch running perfect time by either setting it dial up or crown up...works perfectly but is kind of a pain in the butt...
__________________
Rolex Datejust II 116300
(new watch swagger in full effect)

Bulldurham08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.