ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
23 December 2007, 04:37 PM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,941
|
|
23 December 2007, 05:02 PM | #2 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
|
24 December 2007, 04:10 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
|
|
24 December 2007, 04:17 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harford County MD
Posts: 393
|
different strokes for different folks they say. Patek may not be your cup of tea but you cannot discount their technical prowess, or exceptional quality. My SD is my favorite watch but I can appreciate a Patek or AP or L.U.C. It does not mean i like my SD any less they are different animals entirely.
|
24 December 2007, 12:27 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Ren
Location: Toronto On Canada
Posts: 1,886
|
Stewie I suggest you try asking some bona fide "Patek-aholics" on Timezones Patek forum I would be very interested in their replies...
http://forums.timezone.com/index.php...eadt&frm_id=26
__________________
“Hail to the king, baby" Ash (Army of Darkness 1992) |
24 December 2007, 10:52 AM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 323
|
Quote:
|
|
25 December 2007, 10:33 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Ren
Location: Toronto On Canada
Posts: 1,886
|
No problem my friend you are just as entitled to your opinion as anyone else... i can think of a few people on here who would agree nothing compares to the Rolex... the people on the Patek forum are just very knowledgeable on the brand and could give you tons of info!
__________________
“Hail to the king, baby" Ash (Army of Darkness 1992) |
24 December 2007, 04:08 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
|
I think it's safe to say that, much like with automobiles, the looks of a watch are purely subjective to the individual. For some, the PP's are spectacular, for others, not so much so. I happen to think many Patek's are amazing looking and beautiful examples of watchmaking, but do not begrudge those who think otherwise. It's good to have so many choices.
|
24 December 2007, 11:15 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: the other Lisa
Location: Metro New York
Watch: SS/RG Datejust
Posts: 1,014
|
What's would be considered an entry level Patek?
|
24 December 2007, 06:13 PM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,941
|
|
24 December 2007, 11:22 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Canada, eh
Watch: can I?
Posts: 6,240
|
IMO Patek & Vacheron C are probably the top two watch makers in the world.
Some of their complication watches are simply amazing. Rolex does make fine watches, but as far as complications go, no comparison. If you ever get a chance, take a look at some of the Pateks out there. The movements are pure works of art. I fell in love with one, had day, date, year AND it tracked all the month's dates properly, including leap years. The 60k price tag kept it out of my line up. Too cool, considering I have to adjust my date watches when there are NOT 31 days in a month.
__________________
Something witty to go here. Member # 293 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.