ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 January 2008, 01:32 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Alexander
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Watch: GMT Master II SS
Posts: 425
|
Daytona vs. Daytona.
Need expert advice please.
What would be your choice between Yellow gold with leather strap with inverted 6 on 6 o'clock dial and 2000 series A SS? What is the value of each? Thanks |
1 January 2008, 01:38 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Personally, I'd go for the SS Daytona, since it has the in-house movement that is better, IMHO.
A year 2000 SS Daytona would also have the socalled "Skinny hands" that would probably add to its value since the current Daytonas have Fat Hands (Click here for more about the difference!) Any Daytona with "inverted six" would have the Zenith-modified movt., both in SS, YG and WG. The "inverted" six was seen on the subdial at six from 1991 to 1993. As for value, it depends on the condition.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
1 January 2008, 01:45 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Alexander
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Watch: GMT Master II SS
Posts: 425
|
Should 2000 A series model still have Zenith movt? I have Z series SS. But, I don't like the off center of 9 and 6 o'clock dials. I like original one.
|
1 January 2008, 01:54 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Early 2000 (A-series) would still be with "Zenith" movts.
And since the Zenith modified SS Daytonas are no more made, it would boost the value.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.