ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jokr82 · 18 April 2013, 01:17 AM

Thanks Guys For Explanation!

I had a chance to buy Rolex when I bought my Omega!

But The Omega for me has a more charm to Rolex!

Looks more younger( Iam 30 Years) to Rolex!

Orange bezel, 6-9-12Orange, si14, co-axial, and other stuffs!

Was almost the same price in Mexico Airoport, Of Course the rolex was a little bit more expensive than Omega just a Little!

So I Try Both, but

My choice!

Of course I respect you opinions folks, But Rolex it´s for Older People( 40 for up), and Omega this model in particullar it´s made for young People( 40 to less)!

Just my Opinion, don´t take this the wrong side :)

igwt · 18 April 2013, 06:59 AM

both looks nice in picture and in metal.....

i like the omega in every way... if it was as thin as the sub i think it would be a winner....

the sub sits lower when in the wrist and tend to have the "hugging the wrist" feeling

with the 8500 movement of omega... it tends to float at my wrist...

almost bought one last week.... nice finish and all.... its just the thickness that set me off...

The GMT Master · 18 April 2013, 07:09 AM

Well written review, and the right conclusion. I think I would personally have marked down the Submariner a few extra points, but the arguments raised are spot on, for the most part

Chris

18 April 2013, 01:17 AM	#1
jokr82 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Brasil Posts: 1,048	Thanks Guys For Explanation! I had a chance to buy Rolex when I bought my Omega! But The Omega for me has a more charm to Rolex! Looks more younger( Iam 30 Years) to Rolex! Orange bezel, 6-9-12Orange, si14, co-axial, and other stuffs! Was almost the same price in Mexico Airoport, Of Course the rolex was a little bit more expensive than Omega just a Little! So I Try Both, but My choice! Of course I respect you opinions folks, But Rolex it´s for Older People( 40 for up), and Omega this model in particullar it´s made for young People( 40 to less)! Just my Opinion, don´t take this the wrong side :)

18 April 2013, 06:59 AM	#2
igwt "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: alabang Posts: 211	both looks nice in picture and in metal..... i like the omega in every way... if it was as thin as the sub i think it would be a winner.... the sub sits lower when in the wrist and tend to have the "hugging the wrist" feeling with the 8500 movement of omega... it tends to float at my wrist... almost bought one last week.... nice finish and all.... its just the thickness that set me off...

18 April 2013, 07:09 AM	#3
The GMT Master "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: England Posts: 8,150	Well written review, and the right conclusion. I think I would personally have marked down the Submariner a few extra points, but the arguments raised are spot on, for the most part Chris

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)