ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 April 2013, 11:51 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 131
|
1675 corrosion question
Does some corrosion on the inside of the case back on a circa 1968 1675 GMT greatly affect the value, and will the corrosion continue to get worse? can anything be done to stop or fix it ? Would you let it stop you from buying an otherwise beautiful watch??
|
30 April 2013, 12:06 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 15
|
That my friend is not that bad at all.
|
30 April 2013, 01:03 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Shanghai
Watch: Too many to tell
Posts: 522
|
I would not worry too much. Watch is overall in good shape. I don't think that can substantially affect value. Those in this hobby know about pitting and corrosion in earlier Rolexes. Your case back is not that bad.
If you want peace of mind, you could try a laser welding restoration of the case back. Search the forum for examples and practitioners. I would not do it though. |
30 April 2013, 05:49 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
Not to bad IMHO it can be fixed if it bothers you.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
30 April 2013, 06:16 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
|
i think a bit of corrosion on the very old ones add a bit of character
as long as it's not on the hands and totally visible i'd have no concerns you're not going to use it for diving etc so i'd say it's good to go it'll make a good daily wearer. slap a fat font insert on it and you have a winner i like the matching hands and dial. nice patina
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten |
30 April 2013, 06:57 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
As far as I know, corrosion is unstoppable once it sets in, although you can obviously limit its advance with careful use and keeping it clean. It's my thinking that this sets in due to sweat ingress under the lip of the case-back over many years. I've seen worse, but I've seen better too. Personally, that would put me off, because I like a clean case, and corrosion undermines its 'Oyster' credentials, even if you're not planning on diving with it. I actually don't mind a little corrosion on the hands, but the case has to be intact. Each to their own, though. I like the dial and hands, and the insert looks good. Needs a new bracelet though, or restore that one. Depends on the price, and what you're looking for.
|
30 April 2013, 11:41 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Asia / USA
Watch: on my wrist!
Posts: 113
|
the midcase would usually have corresponding corrosion seen on the caseback... if that case back in your original post is original to the watch, it's mostly located on the outer area of the gasket, so all is well.
i usually prefer a case without corrosion, but if the price is right, i'd go for it. |
1 May 2013, 12:23 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,001
|
If the case corrosion is so bad that the watch doesn't pass a pressure test for water resistance/proof, then I'd be concerned. Otherwise, it's invisible when on the wrist and would be a non-issue for me. Wear and tear is what can be charming on these old timepieces (to a certain extent.) Very nice GMT!
|
1 May 2013, 02:43 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 131
|
Thanks everybody. The corrosion, in its location, does not bother me, so I'll keep it.
|
1 May 2013, 02:46 AM | #10 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Corrosion can be arrested chemically.. Bob Ridley at Watchmakers.com knows the process and can even press in a new mid-case seat if inner corrosion is too bad, saving an original case and serial..
Give him a call and chat with him about your case and caseback to see if it's worth having done.. For the right watch, no problem - I would definitely take the leap and do the repairs..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
1 May 2013, 03:16 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
|
2 May 2013, 12:36 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Margate
Watch: your back
Posts: 324
|
Not a cheap fix if you want to go down that path.
Quote:
I would be more concerned about the mid case if the case back has this pitting as they usually go hand in hand. Pitting is like rust on your car or any metal with in the presence of the right oxidants. Once it starts you have a chain reaction and the only real cure is to grind them out, but with a watch it is not an option in that section of the case. What most people fail to realise is that these stainless metals are not heat treatable, but they do have a high coefficient of thermal expansion. Therefore, welding will expand the metal significantly. The weld will, at least partially, begin to solidify in that expanded geometry. When it completely cools down, it may actually return to near cold dimensions. However, the weld zone will be stressed internally because of the shrinkage. If you still want to dive with the watch, it is recommended to anneal it before machining and perhaps repeating the procedure afterwards. This will remove any welding-induced and cold-working stresses. The annealing process will have to be done slowly and carefully to avoid permanent distortion and ruin the proper fitup of parts on reassembly. I would not expect this to be a cheap fix. If you can live with rust on your car, then I would look at it as living with rust on a watch. |
|
2 May 2013, 12:57 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
Watch looks pretty good and the case is nice. Just FYI......the dial is a service replacement. Probably replaced at the NYC RSC in 1984 judging from the case back markings.
|
2 May 2013, 05:47 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Kauai
Watch: 1675-1680-16750
Posts: 3,346
|
Rust never sleeps!
|
3 May 2013, 01:12 AM | #15 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Quote:
Here is an example of one of Bob Ridleys Projects.. https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=91914
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
3 May 2013, 03:54 PM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Margate
Watch: your back
Posts: 324
|
sounds like my ideal solution!!!! but......
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.