ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 May 2013, 11:55 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
Should I make the plunge?
I was offered this:
PICTURE IS NOT MINE, NOR THE WATCH IM INTEREDTED IN PICTURE IS NOT MINE NOR THE WATCH IM INTERESTED IN But it's exactly like that. For 10.5 k usd. It's in immaculate condition. The bezel is pristine. Works fine. Head only. Should I?
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
16 May 2013, 12:13 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 813
|
A nice condition turn-o-graph would definitely be worth that and more.
but... if any parts are not original (service or aftermarket) the price should drop by A LOT. As with any Rolex sports model from the early 1950s, check 1) all hands, 2) dial, 3) bezel insert, 4) bezel, 5) how polished is the case, 6) pitting on the case, 7) how crisp/clear are the numbers, 8) wear to the lugs, 9) wear to the spring bar holes, ..... |
16 May 2013, 12:35 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
1) all hands
All hands in top condition, patina lume, slight corrosion (negligible) 2) dial Perfect dial with tropical turning potential 3) bezel insert Best I have ever seen for a 50s watch 4) bezel Tip top, sharp edges, no dings 5) how polished is the case Some polished marks, but thick and well maintained 6) pitting on the case Slight, almost negligible. 7) how crisp/clear are the numbers As crisp as your potato chip 8) wear to the lugs Boy - it's thick 9) wear to the spring bar holes Now this I didn't check!
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
16 May 2013, 08:31 PM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: DB
Location: :noitacoL
Watch: :hctaW
Posts: 6,703
|
Sounds like a nice one, but there is just no way to evaluate without pics. As was remarked by Vlad, an original one, in the condition described, would be a very good deal indeed at that price. However, one thing off/not original, and not a good deal at all.
__________________
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. |
17 May 2013, 05:34 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
Yea I would have to get a more detailed and original pic of it. However Im a bit put iff due to the size. It looks tiny!!
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
17 May 2013, 07:32 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 461
|
Go for the refs 1680 or 1665, then
|
18 May 2013, 12:51 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
Yeah I would prefer a red sub I think!
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
18 May 2013, 03:39 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,133
|
Please be aware of one thing: the devil is in the details. And the wrong detail will cost you dearly.
|
18 May 2013, 04:33 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: 16600
Posts: 728
|
Those watches are tiny. I tried one on once and it was puny on the wrist. Go with a 1680 or 1665 for the money. But, just my humble opinion.
V/R Mike
__________________
V/R Mike |
18 May 2013, 09:40 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 461
|
Good decision
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.