ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 July 2013, 06:21 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 273
|
cyclops looks wrong in this one
cyclops looks wrong in this one + the zero feedback...
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Rolex-Expl...item3f27146740 |
18 July 2013, 12:23 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Nathan
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 168000
Posts: 41
|
Hard to tell without better pictures, but the bezel font (specifically the 2s) look a little off, and the numbers look like they sit a little to close to the lip. The seller created his account on Jul 3 and has 0 feedback. Can't understand why anyone would bite at that.
|
18 July 2013, 12:28 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ohio,UnitedStates
Watch: ROLEX OMEGA
Posts: 1,458
|
Idk on this one... I wouldn't go for it!
__________________
ROLEX & OMEGA |
18 July 2013, 01:49 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
|
the watch appears gen, but I wouldn't buy from any seller with 0 feedback.
|
18 July 2013, 02:36 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
The watch appears genuine. Incorrect magnification on the cyclops means aftermarket crystal which can be found on many genuine Rolexes.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
19 July 2013, 09:03 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
Quote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.