The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 January 2008, 12:00 PM   #1
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
Sub Date vs. Sub ND First Impressions

Off the top of my head, these are my impressions:

SEL bracelet is not as comfortable. It feels heavier, thicker, and rattles less.

Wetsuit extension took me a few minutes to figure out.

I set it about 10 hours ago, and it is still spot on. My 14060M would have been fast by a few seconds by now.

You can't read the date unless you are right on top of it, at a 90 degree angle to the crystal.

Lume seems better.

The word ROLEX on the dial seems wider, perhaps to match up better with the OYSTER PERPETUAL DATE.

The new box is better.

Bezel lines up dead on with the minute marks.

I like the chronometer print.

I want to stay up and see when the date flips.

That is all for now.
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2008, 12:02 PM   #2
JBat
"TRF" Member
 
JBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
Congrats on the new acquisition! Pics?
JBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2008, 12:06 PM   #3
Hamilton Carvalho
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 1,225
IMHO, this watch doesn't seem to be the right one for you. You don't seem to be happy with it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Rooney View Post
Off the top of my head, these are my impressions:

SEL bracelet is not as comfortable. It feels heavier, thicker, and rattles less.

Wetsuit extension took me a few minutes to figure out.

I set it about 10 hours ago, and it is still spot on. My 14060M would have been fast by a few seconds by now.

You can't read the date unless you are right on top of it, at a 90 degree angle to the crystal.

Lume seems better.

The word ROLEX on the dial seems wider, perhaps to match up better with the OYSTER PERPETUAL DATE.

The new box is better.

Bezel lines up dead on with the minute marks.

I like the chronometer print.

I want to stay up and see when the date flips.

That is all for now.
Hamilton Carvalho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2008, 12:20 PM   #4
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamilton Carvalho View Post
IMHO, this watch doesn't seem to be the right one for you. You don't seem to be happy with it.
We'll see how it goes. So far it is perfect, but just different from my 14060M. I will tell you one thing that I absolutely know about myself. I am a creature of habit and it takes me some time to get used to change. If I am used to something fitting or feeling a certain way, it's tough to change it up. The best example is my driver. I still play an old Titleist 975J with a prolite shaft because that is what I'm used to. If I get a new laptop I will take the time to move my old keyboard to the new system, and it has to click a certain way. I have 2 new pairs of loafer strewn in the corner of my office, and I still wear the old ones with the holes in the soles. I have a pair of boat shoes that I bought in 1985. I like to wear gray college t-shirts. I guess i'm a little OCD.
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2008, 12:22 PM   #5
Robb
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Robb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Robb
Location: USA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 4,939
Do you not also notice the difference in the size of the dials???
__________________
126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN
Robb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2008, 12:30 PM   #6
Hamilton Carvalho
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 1,225
I understand you now. I think if you spend time with your new watch, you'll eventually love it. I personally love it, and you have IMO a great watch.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Rooney View Post
We'll see how it goes. So far it is perfect, but just different from my 14060M. I will tell you one thing that I absolutely know about myself. I am a creature of habit and it takes me some time to get used to change. If I am used to something fitting or feeling a certain way, it's tough to change it up. The best example is my driver. I still play an old Titleist 975J with a prolite shaft because that is what I'm used to. If I get a new laptop I will take the time to move my old keyboard to the new system, and it has to click a certain way. I have 2 new pairs of loafer strewn in the corner of my office, and I still wear the old ones with the holes in the soles. I have a pair of boat shoes that I bought in 1985. I like to wear gray college t-shirts. I guess i'm a little OCD.
Hamilton Carvalho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2008, 12:31 PM   #7
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robb View Post
Do you not also notice the difference in the size of the dials???

Now that you mention it, it does look bigger.
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2008, 10:18 PM   #8
SSD
"TRF" Member
 
SSD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Georgia
Watch: Stainless Sub Date
Posts: 3,023
Ever so slightly- I forget the measurements. Did you watch the date flip? The times I've been awake I enjoyed the positive "click" from the instant change mechanism. I think you'll like the accuracy! BTW- how old is your 14060M?

And of course, congradulations!

__________________


SUBMARINER OWNERS' CLUB
ESTABLISHED 1953
TRF Member # 5464

SSD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2008, 10:38 PM   #9
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Congrats, Ed!

Just a question: Why did you not opt for the SD??
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2008, 12:30 AM   #10
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER View Post
Congrats, Ed!

Just a question: Why did you not opt for the SD??
I was having trouble deciding between the two, so I opted to play it conservatively. The demand for Subs is always high, this one was serviced at RSC/NY in 2007, so I figured I would have no trouble flipping it if needed. On the flip side, I have seen some SD's languish unsold or go cheap because of the lesser demand.

I guess if it really bugged me, I could remove the cyclops.
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2008, 12:42 AM   #11
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
You made a very good choice, Ed!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2008, 12:46 AM   #12
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER View Post
You made a very good choice, Ed!
I didn't rise to middle management by being no dummy.






or did I?
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2008, 12:52 AM   #13
Trurolexer
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
You already have Sub ND and bought Subdate too? Man...YOU REALLY ROCK!!! Noone do that, but maybe only one I know beside you,...my friend Mike (the Truecollector!!!). LOL!!!
....Or you bought the LV model?
Trurolexer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2008, 03:29 AM   #14
FlyingMoose
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 502
I know what you mean about keyboards, there's nothing like a 1985-vintage IBM model M. There's no match for the buckling spring mechanism. I have about 15 of the keyboards, which I'll probly never need since they seem to keep working forever. I'm typing this on one right now, in fact.
FlyingMoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2008, 11:33 PM   #15
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
So far I am seeing about +3s/day. I will leave it crown-down tonight and see if that slows it a bit.
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2008, 11:38 PM   #16
miner
"TRF" Member
 
miner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,294
Ed
You have two classic watches, both will get the time right most of the time.

Wear them in good health good Mate, leave the micro seconds to Seiko

miner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2008, 02:51 AM   #17
Jedi
"TRF" Member
 
Jedi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
+3 is about right for a 3135 movement in the majority of cases. Mine is +2.5 and I know of several other 3135s that are about the same.
__________________
Lee

This is my watch. There are many like it but this one is mine...

Flickr
Blog
Jedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2008, 11:38 AM   #18
robbyrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 203
My bezel doesn't quite line up perfect but it is really close, I'll try to post a photo sometime
I like the pierced lugs on the no date sub
robbyrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2008, 12:54 AM   #19
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
I just popped the 14060M back on my wrist after 3 days wearing the 16610. I don't even notice the 14060m is there, whereas the 16610 is just not quite right. I'm sure this is more a function of the bracelet and not the watch. Perhaps I will switch the bracelets today.
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2008, 02:56 AM   #20
rxgremlin
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 79
I do happen to think that non-SEL bracelets are more comfortable as they sit a little flatter on the wrist.
rxgremlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 January 2008, 03:47 AM   #21
crimscrem
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Indiana
Watch: SS DJ/SS GMT-IIc
Posts: 583
I just got back from the AD. While I was there, I tried on the sub nd. It's a great, clean looking watch. It would be a great second watch for me. (Second watch, only because I do like having a date.)
crimscrem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2008, 02:58 AM   #22
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
I pulled another link from my SEL bracelet, then loosened it all the way. The Sub Date seems more comfortable than before.

After 5 days I am +3s total. That's pretty darned good.

I played bracelet bingo this weekend. Non-SEL went on the 16610, Black NATO on the 14060M, and the SEL went in the box.

I wore both subs for my commute this morning. One on each wrist.
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2008, 06:42 AM   #23
seantk
"TRF" Member
 
seantk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Sean
Location: West Florida
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Rooney View Post
I wore both subs for my commute this morning. One on each wrist.

It is always good to have a spare... or is this a new fashion statement??

Sean
__________________
"Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau
seantk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2008, 06:54 AM   #24
ttannert
"TRF" Member
 
ttannert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Tim
Location: Ohio
Watch: SS Black Daytona
Posts: 872
Congrats! I am glad to see you are enjoying it so much! Cheers!
__________________
The greatest luxury in life is time; treasure every second.
__________________
My Collection:
SS Rolex M Black Daytona
SS Rolex V Black Milgauss GV
SS Rolex M Black Milgauss
TT Rolex Z White MOP Datejust
SS Rolex M Coke GMT II
SS Tag Heuer Black Kirium Chronometer
ttannert is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.