The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 November 2013, 02:52 AM   #1
mew
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 187
214270 for 14060m?

Should I? I have been thinking this through for a week but still no firm decision.

I have owned the 14060 twice (tritium and superluminova versions) but flipped them for other pursuits but I have always found myself drawn back to this Submariner.

I know I would be giving up the better bracelet and paraflex 3132 movement in the 214270 Explorer but the proportions of the dial and the tiny crown bothers me a little. The 114060 seems like the best of both worlds but I am still not a fan of the square lugs nor the ceramic bezel.

Talk me in or out of making the move back to the Sub ND.
mew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 03:18 AM   #2
lipjin
"TRF" Member
 
lipjin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: HK
Watch: AP ROC, Nautilus
Posts: 1,657
Not a fan of the 214270 Explorer:) Go for the 14060.
__________________
"We must use time wisely and forever realize that the time is always ripe to do right" -Nelson Mandela

"It is not our abilities that show what we truly are. It is our choices" -Dumbledore

Instagram: horolj_
lipjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 03:19 AM   #3
Dr. Robert
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,260
Keep the 14060, save & get the 36mm expl
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Dr. Robert is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 03:36 AM   #4
Cc1966
"TRF" Member
 
Cc1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
Of the two, 14060 would be my first choice. It's a fine choice...Good luck.
__________________

"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way."
Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778
"Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc
Cc1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 03:36 AM   #5
Karbo
"TRF" Member
 
Karbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
Very tough choice !!
I agree on your 114060 stance, winner is 14060m between thoz 2 subs
Personnaly i have an explorer 1016 and a 5513, next week ill receive a 14060m 2004 and im very excited !
My friend you need both !
Explorer is classier and the sub is a daily wearer
SAAAVE
Karbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 03:37 AM   #6
Karbo
"TRF" Member
 
Karbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
By 14060m i mean the 2 liners one ! :-)
Karbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 03:57 AM   #7
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
Wow, that is a tough decision, impossible for me really. I have both, love them both, are keepers in my collection.
The Exp I wears a bit bigger than 39mm, mostly because of the thinner smooth bezel. That Sub is THE Sub, you've got to know that, after two flips!
The Explorer is a bit more versatile, more discreet, as durable as you need, and none of this is as decisive one way or the other as you need. Sorry.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 04:03 AM   #8
superdog
2024 Pledge Member
 
superdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,834
Exp 1. Absolutely. No question.

But I am recently loving the 114060.

Take away the bubble and to me, the watch is symmetrically perfect.

I find the 14060 too small.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it?

IG: gsmotorclub
IG: thesawcollection

(Both mostly just car stuff)
superdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 04:18 AM   #9
Karbo
"TRF" Member
 
Karbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
Small ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by superdog View Post
Exp 1. Absolutely. No question.

But I am recently loving the 114060.

Take away the bubble and to me, the watch is symmetrically perfect.

I find the 14060 too small.

14060 and 114060 same width 40mm
What you mean small ?
Karbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 04:21 AM   #10
superdog
2024 Pledge Member
 
superdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karbo View Post
14060 and 114060 same width 40mm
What you mean small ?
I mean small. It wears smaller.

I've got a 16710 and it wears significantly smaller.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it?

IG: gsmotorclub
IG: thesawcollection

(Both mostly just car stuff)
superdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 04:26 AM   #11
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karbo View Post
14060 and 114060 same width 40mm
What you mean small ?
Might be the same width, but the maxi case, dial, and hands/markers give the 114060 a bigger presence. In comparison the 14060 does look and wear smaller.

You had it twice and still lusting after it.....it's destiny man, get the Sub back. And tiny crowns seem to irk the hell out of me for some reason too, a huge reason why I don't like the Exp 2, they made the watch bigger but left that tiny crown. I know it doesn't matter function wise, but it's the little things....
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 04:41 AM   #12
Karbo
"TRF" Member
 
Karbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
Maybe the weight too
Karbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 05:29 AM   #13
Duey
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Duey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Duey
Location: Maui
Watch: Too Many To List
Posts: 3,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by superdog View Post
I mean small. It wears smaller.

I've got a 16710 and it wears significantly smaller.
I totally agree. They wear smaller
Duey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 05:34 AM   #14
luvsub
2024 Pledge Member
 
luvsub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF, south bay
Posts: 5,222
sub.
luvsub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 05:37 AM   #15
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Sub
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 05:39 AM   #16
Passionata
"TRF" Member
 
Passionata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
^yes


Best
George

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
__________________
Best
George

"Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston
---------------------
*new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new *

http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ
IG @passionata1
Passionata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 07:17 AM   #17
Gerardus
"TRF" Member
 
Gerardus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
Go for the Sub!
__________________

♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300
Gerardus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 08:21 AM   #18
ptugolf
"TRF" Member
 
ptugolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Alan
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: SubC Date
Posts: 676
14060m
ptugolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 08:54 AM   #19
alanc
"TRF" Member
 
alanc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Alan
Location: Connecticut
Watch: 114270 16710B
Posts: 1,062
If you've gotten rid of two and still want one, there's your answer. The 14060 is a classic, IMHO. As for the Exp. I, I'd have a tougher time giving up a 114270 than your 214270, since as you point out, the proportions to me are a bit off.

As it stands, no question, do the trade and keep the Sub this time.
alanc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 11:42 AM   #20
polarinda
"TRF" Member
 
polarinda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,316
Sub
polarinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 12:33 PM   #21
mew
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 187
Thanks guys, I think im pretty much set on the 14060....once again.
mew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 01:01 PM   #22
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,825
Go for the sub. And get the better-proportioned 36mm Explorer 114270 later if you feel any remorse.
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 01:23 PM   #23
Bangel
"TRF" Member
 
Bangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
Yeah, I'm another that says go for the sub, especially seeing as you've identified the dial proportions and the crown size on the Explorer as bugbears of yours.

Just try to hang on to it this time!
Bangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 08:12 PM   #24
mew
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 187
Came home with a 4 Liner 14060m. Comfy like an old pair of jeans !
mew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 08:24 PM   #25
mailman
TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron
 
mailman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by mew View Post
Came home with a 4 Liner 14060m. Comfy like an old pair of jeans !
Very nice
__________________
JJ
mailman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 09:11 PM   #26
Danwealth
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: China
Posts: 220
wear it in good health
Danwealth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 November 2013, 10:19 PM   #27
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
I love that watch and I think it looks great!! Too bad my wife stole mine.
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2013, 02:18 AM   #28
TimeOnMyHands
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: 16570
Posts: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by mew View Post
Should I?
Yes, you should. I would.
TimeOnMyHands is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2013, 02:25 AM   #29
eclea
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Turkey
Posts: 18
14060m in every occasion...
eclea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2013, 02:36 AM   #30
Andrés G
"TRF" Member
 
Andrés G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,392
Congrats. Enjoy your Sub.
Andrés G is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.