ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

FiftyTwoEighty · 8 December 2013, 06:40 AM

Both great watches, but I prefer the uniqueness Sea Dweller over a Sub. With that said, I think my next Rolex will be a meters first, sub, no date.

fliphandywork · 8 December 2013, 06:41 AM

Sd

Frosty · 8 December 2013, 07:15 AM

The SD is heavier when you put it on, but, you soon forget that. I like them both.

Friedl41 · 8 December 2013, 08:25 AM

SD ... It is the queen of Subs ...

If i would have to have only one watch, i would keep my SD

landroverking · 8 December 2013, 08:48 AM

Sd

strafer_kid · 8 December 2013, 09:09 AM

Both are super watches and you could not go wrong - SD definitely wears a little heavier though due to the deeper case.

Ector495 · 8 December 2013, 09:20 AM

Sea dweller has the date wo the cyclops, that's what I would go with.

Racerdj · 8 December 2013, 09:29 AM

The SD wears larger if that makes a difference.

FTX I · 8 December 2013, 09:47 AM

Sub gets my vote

crowncollection · 8 December 2013, 09:59 AM

Sub

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Trurolexer · 8 December 2013, 02:02 PM

Submariner.

77T · 8 December 2013, 02:12 PM

For me the Sub has less long term cost and risk of bigger repair bill.

LA_LEC · 8 December 2013, 08:39 PM

My very first Rolex was the SD and I had it for 2 days before I took it back to the store and exchanged it for a sub date.

Reason I did was that I found it too thick and too heavy. I like to wear my bracelet loose and it was always on one side of my wrist or the other and never in the middle because of that.

The sub on the other hand suffered from neither of those and I found my perfect watch which I wore for a decade until it was sadly stolen!

I replaced it with another sub date only this time the LV!

dysondiver · 8 December 2013, 08:54 PM

rip the cyclops off a sub , and have the very best of both , unless you think the other way , then you would have the very worst of both ,,,,
try them both on , and just keep the one you dont want to take off.

mjclark32 · 8 December 2013, 09:14 PM

All up to what sings to you most. Best of luck!

tomallen · 8 December 2013, 09:18 PM

I own three Subs and a Deep Sea. The Deep Sea is a monster watch and it may be to big for a lot of people. My Deep Sea gets a lot of wrist time. If you are able to do both, a Sub C and a DSSD go for it. If you can only do one, The Sub C.

Jason71 · 8 December 2013, 09:28 PM

They are both awesome, and every watch collection should have a 16610 and 16600. If you want something a little different......Maybe try the Pelagos?? I love mine.....But then, I love all my watches.

RolexDivers · 8 December 2013, 10:22 PM

IF they are the same price, go for the SD .. you are geting more bang for the buck.
Initially the price diff betwen them was only $300 ...

RolexDivers · 8 December 2013, 10:23 PM

oh.. forgot to add .. the bezel. of the SD has deeper cuts/grooves.. it shines or reflects light more strongly than the sub....

Token74 · 8 December 2013, 11:09 PM

I went through this process myself a year ago...in the end it was an easy decision and I went for the SD 16600 for a few reasons:

1. It's a deeply impressive watch and ultimately more capable than the Sub
2. The extra bulk gives it a little more presence on the wrist
3. They don't make SD's anymore so probably a slightly better investment
4. I see lots of Subs in the wild, but never seen another SD

I have now added a new TT Sub 116613 which is lovely, but my SD is still my daily wear...and I do everything with this watch, no holds barred.

travisb · 8 December 2013, 11:18 PM

Sub for me, but there is no clear "better" choice. Just personal.

Mystro · 8 December 2013, 11:22 PM

I love the cyclops. Its funtion is really effective.

Aventura · 9 December 2013, 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kybro

Ok guys I know this has probably been debated a million times but what is the better all round watch sea dweller or submariner forget about the price difference which is the better all round watch?

Sub. forever

slin-nyc · 9 December 2013, 09:49 AM

Sea Dweller for something unique. You can find the Sub everywhere...

red1108nyc · 9 December 2013, 10:19 AM

For me, I like the SD and the symmetry is perfection on my wrist and to my eyes.

DreambreaX · 9 December 2013, 02:43 PM

sub

Roselló · 9 December 2013, 05:36 PM

The SD16600 is just an awesome Rolex. The DSSD on the other hand is just WAY too big. I prefer the 16600 over the 16610 just to be out of the herd. I like the 16610 but not the new C Rolexes.

8 December 2013, 06:40 AM	#31
FiftyTwoEighty 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Woody Location: Surf City USA Watch: me live @the Beach Posts: 1,794	Both great watches, but I prefer the uniqueness Sea Dweller over a Sub. With that said, I think my next Rolex will be a meters first, sub, no date. __________________ Some 4 digits, 5 digits, and 6 digits 2FA

8 December 2013, 08:25 AM	#34
Friedl41 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: SLF41 Location: Spain Watch: Changes Posts: 1,053	SD ... It is the queen of Subs ... If i would have to have only one watch, i would keep my SD __________________ Sea Dweller 16600, Submariner 14060m SUB 5513 meter first (1968) Air King 5500 (1980) GMTc NR, Explorer 1 & II 14270 & 16570 PP 5065a

8 December 2013, 09:29 AM	#38
Racerdj 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Indianapolis Watch: Patek-Philippe Posts: 16,832	The SD wears larger if that makes a difference. __________________ Rolex and Patek Philippe

8 December 2013, 09:59 AM	#40
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,216	Sub Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

8 December 2013, 02:12 PM	#42
77T 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: PaulG Location: Georgia Posts: 42,016	For me the Sub has less long term cost and risk of bigger repair bill. __________________ Does anyone really know what time it is?

8 December 2013, 06:41 AM	#32
fliphandywork "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Michigan Watch: Precision Posts: 435	Sd

8 December 2013, 07:15 AM	#33
Frosty 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: So Cal Watch: Rolex GMT 1675 Posts: 5,087	The SD is heavier when you put it on, but, you soon forget that. I like them both.

8 December 2013, 08:48 AM	#35
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	Sd

8 December 2013, 09:09 AM	#36
strafer_kid "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Kenny Location: northern ireland Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs Posts: 5,136	Both are super watches and you could not go wrong - SD definitely wears a little heavier though due to the deeper case.

8 December 2013, 09:20 AM	#37
Ector495 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: North Carolina Watch: 16622 Posts: 1,097	Sea dweller has the date wo the cyclops, that's what I would go with.

8 December 2013, 09:47 AM	#39
FTX I "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Flavio Location: N/A Posts: 14,654	Sub gets my vote

8 December 2013, 02:02 PM	#41
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	Submariner.

8 December 2013, 08:39 PM	#43
LA_LEC "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Los Angeles Watch: Explorer Posts: 1,793	My very first Rolex was the SD and I had it for 2 days before I took it back to the store and exchanged it for a sub date. Reason I did was that I found it too thick and too heavy. I like to wear my bracelet loose and it was always on one side of my wrist or the other and never in the middle because of that. The sub on the other hand suffered from neither of those and I found my perfect watch which I wore for a decade until it was sadly stolen! I replaced it with another sub date only this time the LV! __________________ 16610 ♛ 16610LV ♛ 214270 MK2 "Life is far too short not to wear a Rolex!"

8 December 2013, 08:54 PM	#44
dysondiver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: tom Location: northern ireland Watch: my fins Posts: 10,063	rip the cyclops off a sub , and have the very best of both , unless you think the other way , then you would have the very worst of both ,,,, try them both on , and just keep the one you dont want to take off.

8 December 2013, 09:14 PM	#45
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	All up to what sings to you most. Best of luck! __________________

8 December 2013, 09:18 PM	#46
tomallen 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Tom Location: Connecticut Watch: Rolex SubC,GMTIIC Posts: 966	I own three Subs and a Deep Sea. The Deep Sea is a monster watch and it may be to big for a lot of people. My Deep Sea gets a lot of wrist time. If you are able to do both, a Sub C and a DSSD go for it. If you can only do one, The Sub C. __________________ Unless you are the lead dog the scenery never changes

8 December 2013, 09:28 PM	#47
Jason71 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Jason Location: USA Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers Posts: 7,973	They are both awesome, and every watch collection should have a 16610 and 16600. If you want something a little different......Maybe try the Pelagos?? I love mine.....But then, I love all my watches. __________________ Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY

8 December 2013, 10:22 PM	#48
RolexDivers Banned Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: BIG BEAR, CA Posts: 1,468	IF they are the same price, go for the SD .. you are geting more bang for the buck. Initially the price diff betwen them was only $300 ...

8 December 2013, 10:23 PM	#49
RolexDivers Banned Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: BIG BEAR, CA Posts: 1,468	oh.. forgot to add .. the bezel. of the SD has deeper cuts/grooves.. it shines or reflects light more strongly than the sub....

8 December 2013, 11:09 PM	#50
Token74 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Vince Location: England Watch: Too many! Posts: 5,744	I went through this process myself a year ago...in the end it was an easy decision and I went for the SD 16600 for a few reasons: 1. It's a deeply impressive watch and ultimately more capable than the Sub 2. The extra bulk gives it a little more presence on the wrist 3. They don't make SD's anymore so probably a slightly better investment 4. I see lots of Subs in the wild, but never seen another SD I have now added a new TT Sub 116613 which is lovely, but my SD is still my daily wear...and I do everything with this watch, no holds barred. __________________ Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune

8 December 2013, 11:18 PM	#51
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,493	Sub for me, but there is no clear "better" choice. Just personal.

8 December 2013, 11:22 PM	#52
Mystro 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: The Mystro ;) Location: Central Pa. Posts: 15,511	I love the cyclops. Its funtion is really effective. __________________

9 December 2013, 09:49 AM	#54
slin-nyc "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Stan Location: North Carolina Watch: 116710 \| 214270 Posts: 29	Sea Dweller for something unique. You can find the Sub everywhere...

9 December 2013, 10:19 AM	#55
red1108nyc 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: Fred Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area Watch: Rolex Posts: 8,512	For me, I like the SD and the symmetry is perfection on my wrist and to my eyes.

9 December 2013, 02:43 PM	#56
DreambreaX Banned Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Rolex Estate Posts: 1,304	sub

9 December 2013, 05:36 PM	#57
Roselló "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: SA, Texas. Watch: * { SD & DJ } * Posts: 943	The SD16600 is just an awesome Rolex. The DSSD on the other hand is just WAY too big. I prefer the 16600 over the 16610 just to be out of the herd. I like the 16610 but not the new C Rolexes. __________________ ......... All In.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)