|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 January 2014, 05:11 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Pietro
Location: Boston
Watch: 16610/LV/16613
Posts: 81
|
Rolex Submariner 14060M P811xxx
What do you guys think ?
2003 box and papers. What a good price to be bought? Thx Pietro |
|
|
|
12 January 2014, 11:16 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
2003?!
I don't think so...
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
|
|
|
|
12 January 2014, 11:22 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Andy
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: AKA: ANDERL712000
Posts: 4,935
|
yeah that is not a 2003 with a T < 25 dial? hahahahahahahaha.
obviuosly a scam
__________________
We want to be the first in the field and Rolex should be seen as the one and only-the best. Hans Wilsdorf, Rolex founder |
|
|
|
|
12 January 2014, 11:24 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
No go pass.
__________________
watches many |
|
|
|
|
12 January 2014, 12:26 PM
|
#5 |
|
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
Looks like a 5513 with one very overpolished lug.
__________________
_______________________ |
|
|
|
|
14 January 2014, 01:14 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Paris
Posts: 73
|
Crown guards over-polished or fake case / lugs too well aligned with end links (while there should be a 1 mm gap) and too rounded at their end. Bracelet is aftermarket. This should correspond to a 90's 14060 and certainly not 2000's
at the end I would pass my way - (I am wearing a 90's 14060 and recognise that the dial is a pretty good copy) |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
