ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Letsgodiving · 16 February 2008, 02:54 PM

I'm really surprised how close this is considering the Sub is so popular. Those damn SD Zealots!

Taurus75 · 16 February 2008, 06:46 PM

I went with the SD simply because there are just too many people with SS SubDates out there. Morever, with the SS SubDate at full MRSP from where I come from, the SD with the option of discounts is definitely a better buy.. Juz my 2 cents

SPACE-DWELLER · 16 February 2008, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steel4me

I think the SD is losing its massive status .... I compared it against
the GMT MASTER IIc and you know it looks tougher than the SD. Also
the gmt IIc feels as massive if not massiver than the SD ....

I'd tend to agree, but IMHO the SS GMT IIc simply does not have the STYLE that the SD has. I am still VERY close to selling my SS GMT IIc and going back to the CLEAN and understated SD.

904L_addict · 16 February 2008, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER

I'd tend to agree, but IMHO the SS GMT IIc simply does not have the STYLE that the SD has. I am still VERY close to selling my SS GMT IIc and going back to the CLEAN and understated SD.

Go for the 16600.

Bo, you and I have parallel thinking. My SD is sorely missed. Sometimes it's love/hate with the GMTIIC and I'm getting more and more tempted to go back the SD.

SPACE-DWELLER · 16 February 2008, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 904L_addict

Go for the 16600.

Bo, you and I have parallel thinking. My SD is sorely missed. Sometimes it's love/hate with the GMTIIC and I'm getting more and more tempted to go back the SD.

Well, some, including my friends and family, think it would be a "down-grade" to go from an SS GMT IIc to an SD (once again). But I don't care! My friends don't know much about watches, and I have a hunch that they only focus on what watch is more expensive and most blingy.

I miss my SD. Period!

904L_addict · 16 February 2008, 07:20 PM

Bo:

Agreed. For some odd reason the GMTIIC doesn't feel as special as the SD. Hard to put into words, but you obviously know what I'm talking about.

SPACE-DWELLER · 16 February 2008, 09:00 PM

Maybe we could make a simultaneous flip, Steven?? Would make it easier for me!

Bungie flipping!

At the count of 3!

1.......2......

seantk · 16 February 2008, 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAC4130

Sean, I am with you all the way!!!! Did you photoshoped this one?

I would like to see a Ceramic Sub but without the brushed center links!!!!

No I did not. This was taken from a thread a few months ago about ceramic subs and BaselWorld predictions, etc. I do not know who did it. There is also a ceramic Submariner No date with red lettering floating around and also a ceramic pepsi GMT.. all look very nice

Sean

SPACE-DWELLER · 16 February 2008, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seantk

No I did not. This was taken from a thread a few months ago about ceramic subs and BaselWorld predictions, etc. I do not know who did it. There is also a ceramic Submariner No date with red lettering floating around and also a ceramic pepsi GMT.. all look very nice

Sean

NOT my pics, but here they are:

(pic from my photobucket; source unknown).

Note that it says "Oyster Perpetual DATE"

(photoshop work by (Jo)Hannes "Baptiste" Kern, Oysterworld).

Alex Stylianou · 16 February 2008, 09:17 PM

Sd

Tombstone · 20 February 2008, 01:59 PM

Mike you make a good point even in jest, I guess I am a damn SD Zealot. Sorry I guess I have been fairly close minded when it comes to the SD. I will try to do better in the future. I own a LV Sub I love it too.

jmjm · 20 February 2008, 03:11 PM

If I was a diver, or even knew how to swim in deep waters, I would consider the SD, but a Sub is plenty waterproof for me.

tandrup · 20 February 2008, 04:35 PM

Sub Date for me

JJ Irani · 20 February 2008, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER

NOT my pics, but here they are:

(pic from my photobucket; source unknown).

Note that it says "Oyster Perpetual DATE"

(photoshop work by (Jo)Hannes "Baptiste" Kern, Oysterworld).

That Ceramic Pepsi looks absolutely out of this world!!

CPCC · 20 February 2008, 04:40 PM

Sd!

Ed Rooney · 21 February 2008, 12:07 AM

Read my review!

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=33141

Drago · 21 February 2008, 01:40 AM

SD! but then I' am so bias I have only had it for 5 days!

View Poll Results: Submariner Date S/S or Sea-Dweller
Sub Date S/S	83	52.20%
Sea-Dweller	77	48.43%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 159. You may not vote on this poll

16 February 2008, 02:54 PM	#61
Letsgodiving "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Mike Location: Virginia, US Watch: SD 16600 Posts: 4,319	I'm really surprised how close this is considering the Sub is so popular. Those damn SD Zealots! __________________ The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC)

16 February 2008, 06:46 PM	#62
Taurus75 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: SEA Watch: Daytona Posts: 87	I went with the SD simply because there are just too many people with SS SubDates out there. Morever, with the SS SubDate at full MRSP from where I come from, the SD with the option of discounts is definitely a better buy.. Juz my 2 cents __________________

16 February 2008, 09:00 PM	#67
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	Maybe we could make a simultaneous flip, Steven?? Would make it easier for me! Bungie flipping! At the count of 3! 1.......2...... __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

20 February 2008, 01:59 PM	#71
Tombstone "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Richard Location: LV, NV Watch: LV Sub and others Posts: 2,689	Mike you make a good point even in jest, I guess I am a damn SD Zealot. Sorry I guess I have been fairly close minded when it comes to the SD. I will try to do better in the future. I own a LV Sub I love it too. __________________ Always working...by choice

16 February 2008, 07:20 PM	#66
904L_addict Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Steven Location: the OC Watch: SS GMT II-C, SD Posts: 186	Bo: Agreed. For some odd reason the GMTIIC doesn't feel as special as the SD. Hard to put into words, but you obviously know what I'm talking about.

16 February 2008, 09:17 PM	#70
Alex Stylianou "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: UK Posts: 1,785	Sd

20 February 2008, 03:11 PM	#72
jmjm Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: John Kim Location: Cerriros, CA Watch: Blue Submariner TT Posts: 380	If I was a diver, or even knew how to swim in deep waters, I would consider the SD, but a Sub is plenty waterproof for me.

20 February 2008, 04:35 PM	#73
tandrup "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: USA Watch: 14060M Posts: 921	Sub Date for me __________________ Regards, Lars 14060M, 16570 White, 116200 Tuxedo Dial Georg Jensen 2347

20 February 2008, 04:40 PM	#75
CPCC "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Bill Location: USA Posts: 1,857	Sd! __________________

21 February 2008, 12:07 AM	#76
Ed Rooney "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Annapolis, MD Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600 Posts: 5,081	Read my review! http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=33141

21 February 2008, 01:40 AM	#77
Drago "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: UK Posts: 43	SD! but then I' am so bias I have only had it for 5 days!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)