ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Chainring · 23 January 2014, 02:18 PM

Funny. I went into an AD today and one of the watches I asked to look at was the 392 but they did not have one. I think it is an interesting watch but no way would i trade an Explorer II for one.

mcorliss · 24 January 2014, 06:57 AM

The 392 is a great watch, despite the "No" responses. IMHO, it wears much better than the 312. I think most Panerai look too big on people's wrists. The 392 is a very comfortable size. Here is the 392 on left and 312 on the right.

24 January 2014, 06:57 AM	#2
mcorliss "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: M Location: Boston Posts: 1,024	The 392 is a great watch, despite the "No" responses. IMHO, it wears much better than the 312. I think most Panerai look too big on people's wrists. The 392 is a very comfortable size. Here is the 392 on left and 312 on the right. Attached Images

23 January 2014, 02:18 PM	#1
Chainring "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: Steve Location: Grand Junction CO Watch: A few, not enough. Posts: 1,725	Funny. I went into an AD today and one of the watches I asked to look at was the 392 but they did not have one. I think it is an interesting watch but no way would i trade an Explorer II for one.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)