ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 March 2014, 02:06 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Watch: 'chu lookin' at???
Posts: 964
|
Myth of the Deep Sea
These are cropped pictures of an individual wearing a Rolex. Can you tell what watch it is? Can you tell how large the individual is? Does the watch look out of place or disproportionate?
The gentleman is 5'6” and 150 lbs (sorry world, I'm too lazy to convert to metric) and relatively slim build. The watch is obviously a Deep Sea. I challenge anyone to say that the watch is too large. The point is that at greater than 3 paces, the Deep Sea looks like any other watch, the size is virtually indistinguishable from every other sport watch out there. So for everyone knocking the size, that's a self-perception not borne out by reality. So for me, I don’t really care if they have a “mid size” sea dweller, I don’t care if Rolex discontinues the Deep Sea, my watch works for me. It doesn’t look too big, it doesn’t look too small, but it looks great with short sleeves. I hate that I sometimes bang it against a door frame, but it’s got enough steel that it should last long enough to give to my kids one day. By that time, they’re probably not going to be arguing whether it’s too big or going out of style. It will just be Dad’s watch.
__________________
"Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society." Mark Twain "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." Homer Simpson SS Midsize DJ 68274 "L" TT Jubilee DJ 116233 "Z" Sea Dweller DS 116660 "V" SS White Dial Daytona "V" |
27 March 2014, 02:26 PM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Nanaimo, B.C.
Watch: DJ2 Blue Romans
Posts: 1,980
|
Quote:
You say that at greater then 3 paces, the Deep Sea looks like any other watch.... That would be fine if my eyes were further then 3 paces away from my watch when I look at the time.
__________________
Everything will be okay in the end. If it's not okay, it's not the end. Life is a cruel teacher It will give you the test first and the lesson later |
|
27 March 2014, 02:29 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
|
I never thought the watch looked too big when wearing this sort of attire however when I could not fit it under most of my long sleeve dress shirts I made the decision to trade it off. I like to rotate all of my pieces to the office.
|
27 March 2014, 02:33 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 307
|
The size of the person doesn't matter as much as the size of the wrist does. In those pictures he has a wrist big enough to accommodate the size of the DSSD. I have a 6 inch wrist and it looked absolutely ridiculous on me and I don't think anyone would be able to argue otherwise.
|
27 March 2014, 02:34 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Bill
Location: USA
Posts: 62
|
As long as you like it, you do not need to explain to us as to why the watch works for you.
|
27 March 2014, 02:37 PM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,886
|
As long as you think it looks good.
|
27 March 2014, 02:41 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Justin
Location: Pa
Watch: Explorer ii
Posts: 3,155
|
There's no way that person is only a buck fiddy... 170, maybe... And I agree, it looks awesome on you! Wear it and love it
|
27 March 2014, 02:42 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 3,745
|
Yeah, not really. Still looks huge imo, and this guy has pretty chunky arms/wrists.
|
27 March 2014, 03:00 PM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,125
|
Watch looks great on you.....wear it with pride and in good health!!!
__________________
Quote:
|
|
27 March 2014, 04:43 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,426
|
|
27 March 2014, 04:55 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
If you put it on your wrist and it doesn't feel comfortable or if it makes you feel self-conscious, then don't buy it.
If you put it on your wrist and it hits the right buttons and you can't stop looking at it, then buy it. As they say in the UK, simples. |
27 March 2014, 05:01 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
Agree that it looks ok in these pictures, but also agree with the comments about wrist size.
The other important thing, is that whist the deep sea looks just about ok on me from these kind of angles, it looks totally stupid from other angles; the case diameter is only a small issue for me, it's the case depth that's the problem (which isn't noticeable from the pictures above). I love the DSSD but it IS way too big for me sadly. So the new SD4000 answers my prayers entirely!
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
27 March 2014, 07:20 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Jonas
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 988
|
Quote:
OK, sorry about the cheap joke. I truly think it is all in the eye of the beholder. Some people will always come out and disagree and have view on basically anything. To me the watch looks fine, proportion-wise. |
|
27 March 2014, 08:14 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Blighty (England)
Watch: Daytona/Pepsi/Sub
Posts: 1,517
|
I will be honest, I like your sentiment of dad's watch and bravo to that but it looks like a clock to my trained eye.
|
27 March 2014, 08:31 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Denis
Location: Flanders, EU
Watch: Diver watches
Posts: 2,009
|
No prob at all, you are from the USA so we 'world' people understand
__________________
AP - BP - UN - GO - GS - JLC - RLX |
27 March 2014, 09:20 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Krishna
Location: Australia
Posts: 611
|
Watch looks great in those pictures..
|
27 March 2014, 10:04 PM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
Size looks good but it's subjective in terms of the comfort.
|
27 March 2014, 10:08 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
Watch looks fine IMO, wear whatever is comfortable
__________________
|
27 March 2014, 10:28 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
When I tried on a DSSD, I felt it was too thick for my comfort.
My subjective assessment of it's suitability for me, of course, has no bearing on anyone else's enjoyment of it on their wrist. If it works for you (and it does look fine on the gentleman in the photos!), then that's all that matters. |
27 March 2014, 10:40 PM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
Not sure why you're so worried about it
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
27 March 2014, 10:43 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 55
|
The DSSD is the truth....end of story
|
27 March 2014, 10:50 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Joey
Location: Canada
Watch: DSSD, PAM, BALL
Posts: 869
|
|
27 March 2014, 10:56 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: FL
Posts: 17
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.