ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mannyv11 · 27 March 2014, 03:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wantonebad

Where? I've got my name in it at Ross Simmon (Now Sidney Thomas in my neck of the woods) and at Lux Bond & Green. I was surprised I was the first call for both store?

haha buying multiples?

iLLGT2 · 27 March 2014, 03:50 AM

YES, I love it. Now a comfortable DSSD lol

SubGunner · 27 March 2014, 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SWISSAHOLICS

$6400 was the last price of the SD

What year was that price at? I seem to remember MSRP on a Sub 16610 being at $6,000 in 2009/2010. At that time I missed out on the SD since it was discontinued for the DSSD.

SWISSAHOLICS · 27 March 2014, 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubGunner

What year was that price at? I seem to remember MSRP on a Sub 16610 being at $6,000 in 2009/2010. At that time I missed out on the SD since it was discontinued for the DSSD.

Same year....Sub was $6000 and SD was $6400 before the discontinuation.

SubGunner · 27 March 2014, 04:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SWISSAHOLICS

Same year....Sub was $6000 and SD was $6400 before the discontinuation.

I knew my memory wasn't fading...the fact that the margin between Sub and SD was not terribly huge, meant that you would essentially choose the SD to not have the cyclops, and vice versa for the Sub.

If it's true that the SD4K is $11,000, a nearly $4,000 price difference is drastic compared to the SubC.

mannyv11 · 27 March 2014, 04:07 AM

I am going to wait for the official price to come out on it... anyone know how long that generally takes?

Wesley Crusher · 27 March 2014, 04:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SWISSAHOLICS

Same year....Sub was $6000 and SD was $6400 before the discontinuation.

Wow. Such a small price difference.

SWISSAHOLICS · 27 March 2014, 04:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubGunner

I knew my memory wasn't fading...the fact that the margin between Sub and SD was not terribly huge, meant that you would essentially choose the SD to not have the cyclops, and vice versa for the Sub.

If it's true that the SD4K is $11,000, a nearly $4,000 price difference is drastic compared to the SubC.

Just pulled out my SD box and took a picture of the original price tag....BNIB purchased in August 2009....."M" serial.....$6400 looks so nice compared to the prices now

bayerische · 27 March 2014, 04:13 AM

I'm not getting on the list. I was thinking about it prior to seeing it, but it doesn't really do it for me.

I'd stick with the older ones.

Nice to have the Sea-Dweller back in the lineup though!

RUK · 27 March 2014, 04:16 AM

I thought I might sell the sub c if the new ones were good but I think the SD looks a lot like the sub C non date .. Don't see the point

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

HauteHorlogerie · 27 March 2014, 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bayerische

I'm not getting on the list. I was thinking about it prior to seeing it, but it doesn't really do it for me.

I'd stick with the older ones.

Nice to have the Sea-Dweller back in the lineup though!

hmmm, It does it in many ways for me...but I want to see it in person first. I did however secure the 116719BLRO...so glad I didn't buy the smurf or the white gold daytona yet. SO GLAD.

joshuaray · 27 March 2014, 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Armyguy03

If they would have done that, I would have passed out. This is one bad azz watch.

Whats the fascination with those?

MovieGuy · 28 March 2014, 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubGunner

I knew my memory wasn't fading...the fact that the margin between Sub and SD was not terribly huge, meant that you would essentially choose the SD to not have the cyclops, and vice versa for the Sub.

If it's true that the SD4K is $11,000, a nearly $4,000 price difference is drastic compared to the SubC.

$11,000 - $8,550 = $2,450.

Token74 · 28 March 2014, 02:43 AM

This is Rolex marketing genius!

The old 16600 was pretty popular but was pretty evenly priced with the Sub so perhaps people were taking them for granted.

So Rolex discontinue the 16600 and bring out the 116660 which pleased some (those blessed with chunky wrists) but made the rest of us (chaps with mincy wrists) extremely frustrated at the discontinuation of the 16600.

They then leave it a few years whilst we make more and more noise about how we need a more sensibly sized SD back in the lineup, and they deliver. But they have introduced a sizeable price gap between the new SD and the Sub, something they wouldn't have been able to do if they had never discontinued it in the first place.

Next step will be to increase the price of the Sub which everyone will accept because it will still appear to be good value to most next to the SD.

Pure. Marketing. Genius.

I love them!

bondtoys · 28 March 2014, 02:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MovieGuy

$11,000 - $8,550 = $2,450.

SDC = 0% discount
SubC = 15-20%

psv · 28 March 2014, 02:45 AM

Around $10,500, so $2,000 more than the Sub 116610 and $1,500 less than the DSSD 116660, but then again, I'm fairly sure there will be a price increase before this one hits the stores.

terrywoods · 28 March 2014, 02:48 AM

Reckon it will be a flippers dream for a month or two

jonnyz1245 · 28 March 2014, 03:03 AM

+1

an a series dweller was my first Rolex and I had it for 9 years until I traded it up for a Deepsea. I sold the Deepsea last year and its the first time I have been w/out a Dweller on my wrist in 15 years. I am 1st on the list at my AD and he said the rep said they should have them in May. No pricing yet but I read on another forum it should be around 10.5K.

I will be really surprised if its 12. I know Rolex raises their prices but not at that clip. That would be a monster increase.

Someone on another forum pointed out that the Swiss price might include VAT. Back that out and the price is more inline with where a modest increase would be on the current lineup.

Looking forward to this piece!

MovieGuy · 28 March 2014, 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bondtoys

SDC = 0% discount
SubC = 15-20%

Best wishes in getting a 15-20% discount on a SubC.

changzilla · 28 March 2014, 04:04 AM

What is the appeal of lug holes? Is it that it's just easier to maintain/clean/switch bracelets?

jonnyz1245 · 28 March 2014, 04:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MovieGuy

Best wishes in getting a 15-20% discount on a SubC.

I can get a 15% discount on a SubC. Not that hard if you shop around a bit.

33JS · 28 March 2014, 04:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MovieGuy

Best wishes in getting a 15-20% discount on a SubC.

Maybe in Germany he can... My local AD in Scandinavia will give 10% off a new BLNR GMT for the asking as he is getting regular supplies. It ends up, with tax free, costing around $7,000.

jonnyz1245 · 28 March 2014, 04:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 33JS

Maybe in Germany he can... My local AD in Scandinavia will give 10% off a new BLNR GMT for the asking as he is getting regular supplies. It ends up, with tax free, costing around $7,000.

Exactly. As with all things, it really depends on several factors. Location, relationship with AD etc.

I got 10% off the new SD and its not even out yet. I can get 10-15 off a SubC from 2 different AD's. BLNR same thing.

27 March 2014, 04:13 AM	#39
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	I'm not getting on the list. I was thinking about it prior to seeing it, but it doesn't really do it for me. I'd stick with the older ones. Nice to have the Sea-Dweller back in the lineup though! __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

27 March 2014, 04:16 AM	#40
RUK "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Real Name: Ruk Location: .ie Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P Posts: 1,232	I thought I might sell the sub c if the new ones were good but I think the SD looks a lot like the sub C non date .. Don't see the point Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ 'The best watch out there is the one you like the most'

28 March 2014, 02:43 AM	#44
Token74 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Vince Location: England Watch: Too many! Posts: 5,744	This is Rolex marketing genius! The old 16600 was pretty popular but was pretty evenly priced with the Sub so perhaps people were taking them for granted. So Rolex discontinue the 16600 and bring out the 116660 which pleased some (those blessed with chunky wrists) but made the rest of us (chaps with mincy wrists) extremely frustrated at the discontinuation of the 16600. They then leave it a few years whilst we make more and more noise about how we need a more sensibly sized SD back in the lineup, and they deliver. But they have introduced a sizeable price gap between the new SD and the Sub, something they wouldn't have been able to do if they had never discontinued it in the first place. Next step will be to increase the price of the Sub which everyone will accept because it will still appear to be good value to most next to the SD. Pure. Marketing. Genius. I love them! __________________ Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune

27 March 2014, 03:50 AM	#32
iLLGT2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Martin Location: NY And FLA Watch: AP ROO Blue Scuba Posts: 2,695	YES, I love it. Now a comfortable DSSD lol

27 March 2014, 04:07 AM	#36
mannyv11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Manny Location: MA Watch: DD,Sub,GMT,Daytona Posts: 4,510	I am going to wait for the official price to come out on it... anyone know how long that generally takes?

28 March 2014, 02:45 AM	#46
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,078	Around $10,500, so $2,000 more than the Sub 116610 and $1,500 less than the DSSD 116660, but then again, I'm fairly sure there will be a price increase before this one hits the stores.

28 March 2014, 02:48 AM	#47
terrywoods "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: UK Posts: 320	Reckon it will be a flippers dream for a month or two

28 March 2014, 03:03 AM	#48
jonnyz1245 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Earth Posts: 2,324	+1 an a series dweller was my first Rolex and I had it for 9 years until I traded it up for a Deepsea. I sold the Deepsea last year and its the first time I have been w/out a Dweller on my wrist in 15 years. I am 1st on the list at my AD and he said the rep said they should have them in May. No pricing yet but I read on another forum it should be around 10.5K. I will be really surprised if its 12. I know Rolex raises their prices but not at that clip. That would be a monster increase. Someone on another forum pointed out that the Swiss price might include VAT. Back that out and the price is more inline with where a modest increase would be on the current lineup. Looking forward to this piece!

28 March 2014, 04:04 AM	#50
changzilla "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Steve Location: Michigan Watch: Nothing yet Posts: 141	What is the appeal of lug holes? Is it that it's just easier to maintain/clean/switch bracelets?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)