The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4 April 2014, 01:26 PM   #1
bric
"TRF" Member
 
bric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Asia Pacific
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 34
Rolex is very very smart... the WG Pepsi will surely be in demand
bric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2014, 02:22 PM   #2
Starbucksboss
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Reno
Posts: 1,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve260 View Post
I stopped in my local Rolex AD yesterday, and had a chance to spend a few minutes with the owner. During our conversation, I expressed my disappointment that the new Pepsi GMTIIC will only be available in white gold, at a retail price expected to be around $40k, and that would put it out of reach for most. If they had released it in steel in the $8k - $10k range, it would likely be a best seller. There is certainly not $30k of white gold in the new model, to justify such a high premium over the existing GMTIIC lineup.

My AD's response was interesting - like any (profitable) manufacturer, Rolex needs to plan production, within their capacity to produce, to maximize profitability. Since Rolex makes so many different models, optimizing production planning across the entire product line is a complex undertaking.

Combine that complexity with a (reasonable) assumption that lighter-colored two-color ceramic bezels may currently be somewhat more challenging/time consuming/lower yield/etc. to produce than black or darker two-tone ceramic bezels, and Rolex could be faced with a production planning choice:

1) Produce a higher quantity of Pepsi ceramic bezels for a steel watch with anticipated high demand and a lower price point, which could also necessitate reducing production for other models, or, (since Rolex sells out it's entire production each year anyway),

2) Produce a smaller quantity of Pepsi ceramic bezels, put them only on WG watches at a high price point to "control demand", and continue to maximize profitability across the entire product line. Certainly looks like that is what they decided to do.

My AD also indicated that the BLNR GMTIIC was still in short supply most places, a year after its' introduction.

Disappointing, but certainly not surprising! Of course, this is all conjecture...

In the meantime, I am glad I was able to get a BLNR GMTIIC a few months ago, since a WG Pepsi is not likely in my future!

Steve
Nonsense...it is nowhere a complex job for a retailer....it is in fact extreemly straight forward for a merchandiser / merchandise planner - ask a shoe retailer if merchandising a watch is complicated .If this is the reason then they are completely incompetant...I think not , its simply about what they concider is right in terms of elevating thier Brand as they see it...nothing technical about it.
Starbucksboss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2014, 05:06 AM   #3
Steve260
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: SeaDweller Family
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starbucksboss View Post
Nonsense...it is nowhere a complex job for a retailer....it is in fact extreemly straight forward for a merchandiser / merchandise planner - ask a shoe retailer if merchandising a watch is complicated .If this is the reason then they are completely incompetant...I think not , its simply about what they concider is right in terms of elevating thier Brand as they see it...nothing technical about it.
Well, it may not be a complex job for a retailer, but for a production planner in an integrated material supply chain supporting dozens of product configurations, each of which can have multiple margin models depending on the overall production mix across all configurations, planning the yearly production can get pretty complex to figure out. I'm sure Rolex is very sophisticated in their production planning modeling, but (like most manufacturers), it is likely ultimately driven by only one thing: maximize profit. And Rolex is certainly very good at that!
Steve260 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2014, 07:51 AM   #4
Starbucksboss
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Reno
Posts: 1,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve260 View Post
Well, it may not be a complex job for a retailer, but for a production planner in an integrated material supply chain supporting dozens of product configurations, each of which can have multiple margin models depending on the overall production mix across all configurations, planning the yearly production can get pretty complex to figure out. I'm sure Rolex is very sophisticated in their production planning modeling, but (like most manufacturers), it is likely ultimately driven by only one thing: maximize profit. And Rolex is certainly very good at that!

Bit more straight forward...sales projections = open to buy. Gross margin wont change much from Rolex to retailer. Merchandizing watches is not that complex...clothing far more involved...this didn't figure in their decision to produce in White Gold...that was a marketing decision pure and simple.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Starbucksboss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2014, 04:22 PM   #5
skprd13
"TRF" Member
 
skprd13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Kauai
Watch: 1675-1680-16750
Posts: 3,346
Vincent
"We will never see a SS Pepsi Ceramic."

I agree!
skprd13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2014, 01:25 AM   #6
kmleffler
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ken
Location: New York, NY
Watch: GS SD GMT
Posts: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by skprd13 View Post
Vincent
"We will never see a SS Pepsi Ceramic."

I agree!
X3 - at least not in my lifetime.
kmleffler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2014, 02:35 AM   #7
DJF881
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 248
Rolex is claiming their ability to make a red and blue ceramic bezel is a huge technological accomplishment. It's something they've been working on for years. I don't think they did all that R&D just to sell the new bezel exclusively on $40,000 WG watches.

They are putting it out in solid gold first, either to entice the purists who have been wanting a red and blue ceramic bezel for years to spend a shitload of money, or because the process by which they make the red and blue bezels isn't scaled up enough to satisfy the market for steel watches.

I'm sure there will be a ceramic "pepsi" GMT available within a couple of years, and I am sure Rolex will use the occasion to raise the price of its steel sports watches to around $11,000.

Fun fact: When the ceramic GMT launched in 2007, Rolex used it as an opportunity to jack the price up about 30%. The old GMT cost about $4500, and the new one cost $5950 at release.
DJF881 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2014, 05:11 AM   #8
Steve260
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: SeaDweller Family
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJF881 View Post
They are putting it out in solid gold first, either to entice the purists who have been wanting a red and blue ceramic bezel for years to spend a shitload of money, or because the process by which they make the red and blue bezels isn't scaled up enough to satisfy the market for steel watches.
I think you are right on track - if they can't yet scale the red/blue bezel manufacturing process up enough to meet the market for steel watches, then put it on WG only and make a ridiculous per-unit profit from those who buy it!
Steve260 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2014, 05:40 AM   #9
submariner66
"TRF" Member
 
submariner66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: John
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJF881 View Post
Rolex is claiming their ability to make a red and blue ceramic bezel is a huge technological accomplishment. It's something they've been working on for years. I don't think they did all that R&D just to sell the new bezel exclusively on $40,000 WG watches.

They are putting it out in solid gold first, either to entice the purists who have been wanting a red and blue ceramic bezel for years to spend a shitload of money, or because the process by which they make the red and blue bezels isn't scaled up enough to satisfy the market for steel watches.

I'm sure there will be a ceramic "pepsi" GMT available within a couple of years, and I am sure Rolex will use the occasion to raise the price of its steel sports watches to around $11,000.

Fun fact: When the ceramic GMT launched in 2007, Rolex used it as an opportunity to jack the price up about 30%. The old GMT cost about $4500, and the new one cost $5950 at release.
Wow! 2007 was a big turning point then!?
submariner66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 April 2014, 10:16 PM   #10
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Apparently the Pepsi insert is slightly different. Sufficiently such that it is incompatible with the SS bezel. Sorry guys, looks like you'll have to get the WG GMT.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2014, 04:36 PM   #11
theseira
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Hidden
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Apparently the Pepsi insert is slightly different. Sufficiently such that it is incompatible with the SS bezel. Sorry guys, looks like you'll have to get the WG GMT.
Yeah seems like it!

I was thinking about getting the sweet 718 but held off. I guess I will get the pepsi instead once the hype dies down of course.
theseira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2014, 04:29 AM   #12
globalmedia33
"TRF" Member
 
globalmedia33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Thien
Location: Frisco,TX/Saigon
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 2,754
I really like the new Pepsi GMTIIC but my wallet did not allow me.
__________________
Sub. 5513
116710LN
116610LV
“I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO
globalmedia33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2014, 07:56 AM   #13
The GMT Master
"TRF" Member
 
The GMT Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
From what I've heard from those who have been to Basel and spoken with Rolex directly, there are two big points. The first, as Mike has mentioned above, the Pepsi ceramic bezel is thicker compared to the current ceramic inserts - therefore, you will not be able to swap one from the WG model to a SS model. The second point is that it is a much more complex chemical process than the one used on the black/blue (which isn't exactly straightforward in the first place!). The figure being mentioned is that if the Pepsi insert was added to a steel model, it would add £2k onto the asking price. Would people pay £8000 for a steel GMT? I think it would be a very tough sell

Chris
The GMT Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2014, 02:45 PM   #14
build4boost
"TRF" Member
 
build4boost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Chris
Location: Baltimore MD
Watch: My next Rolex!
Posts: 159
We all know Rolex does not make the same model/ color combo in SS and Precious metals. So... The Pepsi will always be in WG and never in SS.
I could care less because I don't like colored watches, but I understand why most people are up in arms about the iconic "pepsi" GMT being more exclusive since its in WG.
__________________
Chris N.
SS Yacht-Master II "random". Explorer 42mm Polar "G". DSSD "V". SS GMT-C "V".
build4boost is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.