The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 April 2014, 11:43 PM   #1
CW3SF
"TRF" Member
 
CW3SF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Denver
Watch: 16610
Posts: 77
New Member, common delimma

Hello all,

Noob here.

I have always lusted for a 16610 Sub Date but wasn't really educated on the latest models etc. I came here to learn more and explore my options. My 50th is coming up soon and I have decided that it is time.

Trying to decide between 16610 and 116610. In some respects I would like to have the newest model. But I have had issues with some of the larger case watches (other brands). So I am concerned that I will be unhappy with the size.

I want to get this right the first time. Today I am leaning toward 16610 but I am easily swayed, lol. Yesterday I was sure it should be the 116610.
CW3SF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 12:18 AM   #2
GsurgBM
"TRF" Member
 
GsurgBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough
Posts: 3,759
Go to AD. Try on the new one. If you love it, get it. If not, go for the older one.
__________________
Rolex • Tudor • Omega • Panerai
GsurgBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 12:21 AM   #3
MonBK
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
Sounds like you haven't tried any of them?
MonBK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 12:26 AM   #4
CW3SF
"TRF" Member
 
CW3SF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Denver
Watch: 16610
Posts: 77
I have tried the 16610. I have not tried the 116610. Will do.
CW3SF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 12:28 AM   #5
nickb732
"TRF" Member
 
nickb732's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Nicholas
Location: UK
Posts: 2,630
The case size is the same. It just appears bigger because of the lugs and crown guard.
__________________


Nick
nickb732 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 12:29 AM   #6
mjclark32
"TRF" Member
 
mjclark32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
Definitely try them both on. The 16610 was perfect for me. Good luck!
__________________
mjclark32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 12:30 AM   #7
mannyv11
"TRF" Member
 
mannyv11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Manny
Location: MA
Watch: DD,Sub,GMT,Daytona
Posts: 4,510
I've had both and really enjoy the newer version over the older one. Both are very comfortable but the glidelock clasp is just an amazing addition and makes micro adjustments on the fly super easy =).
mannyv11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 12:32 AM   #8
Snow-Dweller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Snow-Dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Clive
Location: The Alps
Watch: collections change
Posts: 6,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickb732 View Post
The case size is the same. It just appears bigger because of the lugs and crown guard.
....and bezel.

It took a while for the newer ones to grow on me, but now I love them.

Also, don't forget the bracelet and clasp. Study them both properly. They both have their pros, but IMHO the new ones with glide-lock are superior in every way.

Not to complicate things, you should also look at the no date Subs....
__________________
.
The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings...
———————————————————————————————————

.
16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. GMW-B5000D.
Snow-Dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 12:33 AM   #9
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Certainly try them on. If you're in Vegas (?) head to the Wynn and you'll be in Rolex heaven.
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 01:03 AM   #10
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,234
Agree with all the above, gotta try both on before you decide. Good luck, welcome to TRF and keep us posted!
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 01:03 AM   #11
sco
"TRF" Member
 
sco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
No question, go new and Ceramic!
sco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 01:09 AM   #12
CW3SF
"TRF" Member
 
CW3SF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Denver
Watch: 16610
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by texex91 View Post
Certainly try them on. If you're in Vegas (?) head to the Wynn and you'll be in Rolex heaven.
Thanks for all of the input. Will drop by the nearest AD and try them on.

I am in NashVegas, er Nashville, TN.
CW3SF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 01:11 AM   #13
tkerrmd
"TRF" Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
they are both great and no real size differences but I prefer the newer version mostly because of the clasp but the ceramic bezel and maxi dial don't hurt either

welcome, good luck
tkerrmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 01:27 AM   #14
The Joker
"TRF" Member
 
The Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,641
I think the older is more attractive, save some dough as well.
The Joker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 01:47 AM   #15
Robbyman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Blighty (England)
Watch: Daytona/Pepsi/Sub
Posts: 1,517
I had the same problem and bought the SubC (same year as the birth of my child). The watch is amazing, it really is a work of art.

Calling it stunning or beautiful is not enough, you will catch yourself looking at it just to look at it. The bezel, the dial, the blue lume are all just yummy. I really love my SubC.

But.....those lugs mean to me it is not a proper Submariner or the one I really wanted. Yes it is better (argue away) because if the new developments but I would like the older model on my wrist to see which I really would prefer.

In essense the SubC is a piece of jewellry, the older model a tool watch. By tool watch I mean go anywhere and do anything type of take a beating. A SubC can do this but would look the worse for it as it is a show off or poser.

Get a new one or get an old one, all are great. For me I am not done and still need to scratch the itch. I guess with a SubC you may feel the same?
Robbyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 05:28 AM   #16
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,016
After you put them both on then you'll know what's right for you.
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 05:30 AM   #17
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
They are the same size, but the new model will wear larger due to the wider lugs. As others have said, you really need to try both of them on to see which works best for you.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 06:55 AM   #18
AndyK
"TRF" Member
 
AndyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Chicago
Watch: 216570
Posts: 878
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Snake View Post
I have tried the 16610. I have not tried the 116610. Will do.
I have a 16710 (old style case) and a 116610 (new style) and although they are both technically the same size at 40mm, the 116610 does seem larger. Maybe more like a 42 mm watch. So I'd try to try them on if I were in your shoes. Good luck!
AndyK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 07:00 AM   #19
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
Both are 40mm and neither is a large watch

From a few feet away you'll struggle to tell the difference between them

I like all of the nice updates - bracelet, clasp (especially), lume, etc...
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 07:06 AM   #20
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
If the size is OK for you I'm sure you will want the subc when you try it on.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 08:51 AM   #21
CW3SF
"TRF" Member
 
CW3SF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Denver
Watch: 16610
Posts: 77
Tried out a Sub C at AD. It was just right.
Didn't really feel any bigger to me, just a little bit different than 16610 (in a good way).
The improved clasp is awesome. That is a tremendous upgrade.

Sub C is the way I want to go. Thanks for the input.
CW3SF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 09:04 AM   #22
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Snake View Post
Tried out a Sub C at AD. It was just right.
Didn't really feel any bigger to me, just a little bit different than 16610 (in a good way).
The improved clasp is awesome. That is a tremendous upgrade.

Sub C is the way I want to go. Thanks for the input.
Agreed. The SubC is a great watch. You will love it.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 09:05 AM   #23
thomaspp
"TRF" Member
 
thomaspp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
116610 any day of the week!
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous
thomaspp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 09:11 AM   #24
Georg
"TRF" Member
 
Georg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Northern Calif
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 93
Sorry, dumb question...what is the exact definition of 'SubC?'
Georg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 11:21 AM   #25
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
Welcome! I would take a 116610 (Sub C) anytime!
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 11:24 AM   #26
sco
"TRF" Member
 
sco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
Subc = Ceramic bezel

OP great choice! You'll love it.
sco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 11:29 AM   #27
skypilot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 490
I put on a 116610 and it made me love my 11610 more.
skypilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 12:06 PM   #28
viper9669
"TRF" Member
 
viper9669's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: SIN
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 5,066
New Member, common delimma

Congrats on your choice!

I tried on the 16610 a few years back, it felt very good on the wrist, and then I tried on the SubC 116610.

The improvements won me over.
viper9669 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 01:05 PM   #29
Starbucksboss
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Reno
Posts: 1,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Snake View Post
Hello all,

Noob here.

I have always lusted for a 16610 Sub Date but wasn't really educated on the latest models etc. I came here to learn more and explore my options. My 50th is coming up soon and I have decided that it is time.

Trying to decide between 16610 and 116610. In some respects I would like to have the newest model. But I have had issues with some of the larger case watches (other brands). So I am concerned that I will be unhappy with the size.

I want to get this right the first time. Today I am leaning toward 16610 but I am easily swayed, lol. Yesterday I was sure it should be the 116610.
Go and try both...I had same dilemma and went for the classic case...not because of size alone but for me its just a nicer design all around.
Starbucksboss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 April 2014, 02:24 PM   #30
Nycturbovr6
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
Go to an authorized dealer and try some on and then make your decision.
Nycturbovr6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.