ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

gunsuka · 4 July 2014, 11:26 PM

Saw this posting on the bay.

In the first photo the minute hand looks defective.

Then in the second photos, the hand looks fine.

Something seems off to anyone else? Guy has quite bad feedback, but does list a lot of vintage watches.

bearone2 · 4 July 2014, 11:45 PM

the date's the same....looks like the 2nd pic was taken 15 secs later from a different view.

gunsuka · 4 July 2014, 11:47 PM

So what could that 'blob' be on the hand in the 1st photo? Some type of reflection from the glass? Maybe it is really there and they doctored the photo in the 2nd shot.

iclick · 5 July 2014, 01:16 AM

On the bezel insert, the flaw on the bottom of the "0" at "20" is similar in both photos, as is the nick at about 1.5 min. just to the right of the 12 marker. They aren't exact but are similar enough to make me think the differences are a lighting and/or angle issue.

crowncollection · 5 July 2014, 07:54 AM

Lighting

4 July 2014, 11:26 PM	#1
gunsuka "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Hong Kong Watch: 168000 Posts: 29	Differ photos, claiming same watch? Saw this posting on the bay. In the first photo the minute hand looks defective. Then in the second photos, the hand looks fine. Something seems off to anyone else? Guy has quite bad feedback, but does list a lot of vintage watches. Last edited by gunsuka; 4 July 2014 at 11:27 PM.. Reason: additions

5 July 2014, 01:16 AM	#4
iclick "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Louisiana Posts: 813	On the bezel insert, the flaw on the bottom of the "0" at "20" is similar in both photos, as is the nick at about 1.5 min. just to the right of the 12 marker. They aren't exact but are similar enough to make me think the differences are a lighting and/or angle issue. __________________ GMT 1675 SS (1969) Tudor Big Block Chrono 79170 white-dial panda (~1993) Tudor Big Block Chrono 79180 black-dial panda (~1993) Tudor Sub 79090 (1992)

5 July 2014, 07:54 AM	#5
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,216	Lighting __________________ watches many

4 July 2014, 11:45 PM	#2
bearone2 Banned Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: Arizona Watch: 116713LN Posts: 402	the date's the same....looks like the 2nd pic was taken 15 secs later from a different view.

4 July 2014, 11:47 PM	#3
gunsuka "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Hong Kong Watch: 168000 Posts: 29	So what could that 'blob' be on the hand in the 1st photo? Some type of reflection from the glass? Maybe it is really there and they doctored the photo in the 2nd shot.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)