ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 March 2008, 12:56 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Kurt
Location: Philly Burbs!!
Posts: 3,296
|
I actually have a serious question......
I know, really.....from me
Anyway......I was in a non Rolex AD, more of a larger Jewelry chain if you will, and one of the sales reps asked to clean my watch.....no biggie I thought, but I figured, what the hell.......so as I'm taking it off, he makes mention that the "stemaer" will do it nicely. Whoa there buddy!!!! I told him nevermind and proceded to still look around.......has anyone had this happen before? and would it have been okay to put my watch in a Jewelry sonic steamer thingy......? (yes, that is a technical term )
__________________
“This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the BLUE pill - the story ends; you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the RED pill - you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.” Rolex Submariner 116610LV Hulk | Rolex GMT 16710 Pepsi | Omega Speedmaster “Speedy Tuesday” | Tudor Black Bay 79220R “ETA Rose” | Tudor Pelagos Blue Dial | Rolex Submariner Yellow Gold 116618LB | Rolex Milgauss “Z-Blue” 116400GV |
24 March 2008, 01:05 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Vu
Location: Dallas area
Watch: Platinum YM
Posts: 2,646
|
Hhmm...if it uses sonic vibrations, I wouldn't let them do it. The last thing you want are loose parts jiggling around in the case.
|
24 March 2008, 01:06 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Ken
Location: toronto
Watch: 18K YG Day Date
Posts: 2,985
|
I would have no idea to be honest!!!
__________________
DAUNWAUN |
24 March 2008, 01:12 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,295
|
Just the bracelet would be fine...I wouldn't put the head in there though.
|
24 March 2008, 01:24 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: George
Location: CT
Watch: Rolex Datejust
Posts: 210
|
I wouldn't let them touch my watch thats for sure.
|
24 March 2008, 01:27 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Lawson
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Watch: GMT's, Subs, OQ's
Posts: 152
|
Not a good idea IMO.
|
24 March 2008, 01:28 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Perth/Singapore
Posts: 1,764
|
i prefer a good amount of soft brushing to do the cleaning, and plenty of hot water
|
24 March 2008, 01:32 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Pat
Location: PNW
Watch: your P's and Q's
Posts: 2,549
|
It's a common practice... The steamers they have, however, are intended for rings, necklaces and other jewelry. My AD has done it before but limited to only the bracelet. I wouldn't use or let be used an ultrasonic cleaner on any watch. Maybe just the bracelet but only after removing it.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 16710 (Blk/Blk) Rolex Explorer 114270 Sinn 356 Sa Flieger Limes Endurance 1Tausend Too many others... #2592 It may seem like I'm doing nothing but, at a cellular level, I'm actually quite busy... |
24 March 2008, 03:22 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Queensland, AUST
Posts: 2,003
|
No No No....don't trust ANYONE you don't know with your Rolex.
|
24 March 2008, 03:45 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
|
I used to have my watch cleaned at my AD before. They would clean it by using hot steam on the watch. But now, I just clean the watches myself since I just prefer to do the job myself. Plus, just water and mild soap is more than enough to keep your watch clean and working perfectly for many years.
Using steamers, ultrasonic cleaners is just not really necessary at all.
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial |
24 March 2008, 04:43 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: USA
Posts: 1,857
|
If you can wear it shooting hand guns, a little ultrasonic shouldnt matter
__________________
|
24 March 2008, 04:44 PM | #12 | |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
Quote:
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
|
24 March 2008, 04:52 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Ron
Location: Alabama
Watch: Daytona,TT Sub,GMT
Posts: 4,673
|
Agreed. Rolex bracelets would be fine however, don't put the case in ultrasonic cleaners.
__________________
Ron |
24 March 2008, 05:01 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
|
RSC Bexley used an ultra-sonic on my (complete) GMT when they performed a "while you wait" bezel insert swap, no probs & if anything its my best timekeeper.
|
24 March 2008, 05:04 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Pat
Location: PNW
Watch: your P's and Q's
Posts: 2,549
|
I don't think an occasional trip to the ultrasonic cleaner would be a bad thing for the bracelet at all. In fact, an external brushing does little to nothing to clean the gunk from the internal connecting pins or the surfaces they contact. The solution for ultrasonic cleaners is quite lubricious and does a good job of removing stuff from all those tight and hidden surfaces you can't get to with a brush. That said, I wouldn't do it too often and make sure you use the plastic basket. Too often could prematurely wear parts and corrupt the finish if put directly in the metal pan. JMHO...
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 16710 (Blk/Blk) Rolex Explorer 114270 Sinn 356 Sa Flieger Limes Endurance 1Tausend Too many others... #2592 It may seem like I'm doing nothing but, at a cellular level, I'm actually quite busy... |
24 March 2008, 05:05 PM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
Regarding untrasonic cleaners.
Many years ago I designed and manufactured ultrasonic cleaners for laboratory applications. The small ones with a capacity of up to say 500 ml (about 16 fluid ounces) were very low wattage transducers (50 Watts @ 18 - 40 KHz and would probably be harmless to a Rolex movement, 'o' ring seals and fingers. These small ones are the 'jeweller' type cleaners that you would purchase from a store. The heavy duty 'Commercial' ultrasonic cleaners for serious cleaning would not be recommended as they could cause damage. If in doubt, I would only immerse the bracelet in an ultrasonic cleaner unless I had established the transducer power output. Info attached:- Processs Description In a process termed cavitation, micron-size bubbles naturally present in a liquid form and grow due to alternating positive and negative pressure waves in a solution. The bubbles subjected to these alternating pressure waves continue to grow until they reach resonant size. Just prior to the bubble implosion, there is a tremendous amount of energy stored inside the bubble itself. Temperature inside a cavitating bubble can be extremely high; 3,000°C, with pressures up to 10,000PSI. The implosion event, when it occurs near a hard surface, changes the bubble into a jet about one-tenth the bubble size, which travels at speeds up to 400 km/hr toward the hard surface. With the combination of pressure, temperature, and velocity, the jet frees contaminants from their bonds with the substrate. Because of the inherently small size of the jet and the relatively large energy, ultrasonic cleaning has the ability to reach into small crevices and remove entrapped soils very effectively. An excellent demonstration of this phenomenon is to take two flat glass microscope slides, put lipstick on a side of one, place the other slide over top, and wrap the slides with a rubber band. When the slides are placed into an ultrasonic bath with nothing more than a mild detergent and hot water, within a few minutes the process of cavitation will work the lipstick out from between the slide assembly. It is the powerful scrubbing action and the extremely small size of the jet action that enable this to happen.
__________________
E |
24 March 2008, 06:02 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Good called you passed on having it steamed.
Your Rolex.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
24 March 2008, 06:13 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Phil
Location: London
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 1,765
|
I've also would have also said thanks for the offer but no thanks
|
24 March 2008, 10:25 PM | #19 | |
TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,510
|
Quote:
__________________
JJ |
|
24 March 2008, 10:27 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: New York
Watch: Patek 5980r
Posts: 489
|
i would have done the exact same thing. run out of the store.
|
24 March 2008, 10:28 PM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Michael
Location: LaLa Land
Watch: Sub Date 16610
Posts: 1,757
|
Thanx for the info Eddie. Noted for future. :-)
|
24 March 2008, 10:52 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: England.
Watch: Various
Posts: 7,305
|
Glad this came up, in my naivety I would probably have had it done, now though, having read the comments, I wouldn't.
__________________
KINDEST REGARDS DAVE |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.