ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 August 2014, 10:55 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Spencer
Location: New York
Watch: Blue wg submariner
Posts: 7
|
Rolex 16808 question
I am purchasing a vintage rolex 16808 18 k yg submariner and I had a question I was hoping someone could help me with. The serial number leads me to believe it was produced in 1980.
Is it possible for the dial to have a brown purple tropical color to it? Also, does the dial of this year have a "nipple" number marker dots? |
13 August 2014, 11:02 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Spencer
Location: New York
Watch: Blue wg submariner
Posts: 7
|
The watch is a blue submariner 18k yg that originally had a blue face but is now a tropical dial.
|
13 August 2014, 11:13 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
Welcome to TRF
Post some pics . . . And you are in the wrong section . . . you should post in the Vintage Section |
14 August 2014, 05:50 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Spencer
Location: New York
Watch: Blue wg submariner
Posts: 7
|
Didn't realize I was in the wrong section! I am new at this. Thank you for letting me know.
|
14 August 2014, 06:30 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
Dial of that model is known to go tropical and change colour especially nipples.
__________________
watches many |
14 August 2014, 07:40 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Spencer
Location: New York
Watch: Blue wg submariner
Posts: 7
|
This is the picture of the watch if it helps at all
|
14 August 2014, 08:35 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
|
Normal for it to change that color.
|
14 August 2014, 09:44 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Spencer
Location: New York
Watch: Blue wg submariner
Posts: 7
|
I was hoping so, but was wondering if everything else in regards to the dial and bezel insert looks normal. Thank you for your feedback!
|
14 August 2014, 10:24 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
U need better pictures. It looks fine as far as condition. That said I don't like the color change on this dial. Maybe it's the picture, it looks like the dial has degrade almost brown which is less desireable IMO. It should be purple but still shiny. Here is my recent acquisition. Not nipple but close enough ;)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
14 August 2014, 11:08 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,506
|
IMO that dial looks to be bleached... The seep pattern and color isn't
"Normal" aging. There should still be an even, shiny finish. A better pic would help. |
14 August 2014, 12:29 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Spencer
Location: New York
Watch: Blue wg submariner
Posts: 7
|
Here's another pic. The dial is faded to a shiny light purple/brown.
|
14 August 2014, 12:50 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
That's not nipple dial which is period corect . If u like the color I guess it's fine. But it's too "tropical" for my taste. I like it with deep purple instead of this. I don't think it was bleached due to the fact that the outer perimeter is still deep purple. The insert looks
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
14 August 2014, 12:51 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
Rolex 16808 question
Sorry. I could b wrong but the insert looks thinner than mine which is later 1983.
I guess it depends on the price. It's still a solid gold sub. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
14 August 2014, 12:56 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Spencer
Location: New York
Watch: Blue wg submariner
Posts: 7
|
Thanks for your input. Mine is from 1980 so may be different for that reason. I am more than happy with the color of the mine and actually prefer it.
|
14 August 2014, 01:19 PM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,506
|
I don't like the uneven patina. That photo is better, but I just highly doubt that
Dial achieved that coloration without external pressure. Without a bracelet that May be a $9k head. The insert is a later replacement too IMO. |
15 August 2014, 06:15 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Thomas
Location: london
Watch: 5512, 6263, 6265
Posts: 104
|
looks like some moisture got into it, so as nice as some you can find imho.
|
15 August 2014, 08:46 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
|
15 August 2014, 09:07 AM | #18 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,010
|
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
15 August 2014, 09:11 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Walter A.
Location: Sunny California
Watch: 16760
Posts: 2,629
|
__________________
Our shadows taller than our soul........ |
15 August 2014, 11:15 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
Rolex 16808 question
|
15 August 2014, 11:18 AM | #21 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,010
|
Quote:
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
|
15 August 2014, 11:21 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
All of Ken's watches are Top Shelf
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
15 August 2014, 11:54 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
Yeah any one of Ken's watch can b my grail. Cheers
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
15 August 2014, 12:10 PM | #24 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
The dial is incorrect and should be a nipple dial. The one on the watch now appears to be a natural fade and not bleached.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
15 August 2014, 01:53 PM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,506
|
Can you explain the inner and outer rings?
I've seen alot of these dials over the years, and this one seems forced to me. My impression is that uneven patina is a red flag. It also looks similar to other chemically altered (bleach, alcohol, mineral spirits) dials I've seen. |
15 August 2014, 02:36 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
If I'm not mistaken the ref. 16808 started in 1979 and continue until the late 80's. During this period, it seems there are two versions, nipple and ring markers. I have heard that Rolex still sell nipple dials through out the 80's. Also starting with 16808 the bezel is unidirectional and comes with sapphire crystal. Hope this helps.
|
15 August 2014, 02:41 PM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
Quote:
|
|
15 August 2014, 05:27 PM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: US
Posts: 101
|
I have a transitional R code 16808 from 1987, blue nipple dial, 300m, sapphire crystal. Probably the last year for nipple dials in 16808. So the nipple dial was available well into the 1980s.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.