ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mic6 · 6 April 2008, 03:10 AM

http://forums.timezone.com/index.php...rt=0&rid=28811

frostie · 6 April 2008, 03:11 AM

Thanks a lot for sharing the link

mike · 6 April 2008, 03:12 AM

Matt Dial!!!!

Trurolexer · 6 April 2008, 03:52 AM

Thanks for info!!!

JJ Irani · 6 April 2008, 03:54 AM

Good stuff.....thanks for sharing. That watch would look fantastic on at least a 7¼" wrist or more.

Does anyone have the exact case diameter of the new SD?

Thanks - JJ

mic6 · 6 April 2008, 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Good stuff.....thanks for sharing. That watch would look fantastic on at least a 7¼" wrist or more.

Does anyone have the exact case diameter of the new SD?

Thanks - JJ

Rolex states 43mm

JJ Irani · 6 April 2008, 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mic6

Rolex states 43mm

Hmmm....same as the YM-II.

Thanks - JJ

timackerman · 6 April 2008, 09:39 AM

I wonder why they chose 3900m to put on the dial if they tested up to 5000m!?!?!

But then again I remember seeing something that said the Sub was tested to about 2000ft, and it was only around the 2000ft mark that the pressure caused the case back to bend, and would have caused the failure of the movement.

I guess better safe then sorry!

seantk · 6 April 2008, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

That watch would look fantastic on at least a 7¼" wrist or more.

JJ,

Do you think the Deep Sea will look to big on my 6 3/4" wrist?? (yes that is my wrist size)

Oh no! The stupid questions are starting already

Sean

JJ Irani · 6 April 2008, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seantk

JJ,

Do you think the Deep Sea will look to big on my 6 3/4" wrist?? (yes that is my wrist size)

Oh no! The stupid questions are starting already

Sean

You could always sling it around your neck, Sean!!

Andad · 6 April 2008, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timackerman

I wonder why they chose 3900m to put on the dial if they tested up to 5000m!?!?!

But then again I remember seeing something that said the Sub was tested to about 2000ft, and it was only around the 2000ft mark that the pressure caused the case back to bend, and would have caused the failure of the movement.

I guess better safe then sorry!

In the TZ thread they stated that the number 4000 or even 4500 were not good numbers for the Asian Market but 3900 and 12800 were ok. Go figure that out?

seantk · 6 April 2008, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directioneng

In the TZ thread they stated that the number 4000 or even 4500 were not good numbers for the Asian Market but 3900 and 12800 were ok. Go figure that out?

TRF member Jedi mentioned this and also explained the numbers here in this thread

Sea Dweller Number conspiracy - click me!

Sean

mickeydainish · 6 April 2008, 09:54 PM

gr8 info... tx for the link... I am liking the SDD more and more!!! :-)

6 April 2008, 03:10 AM	#1
mic6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Europe Watch: 116718 green Posts: 1,944	newest info about the sdds http://forums.timezone.com/index.php...rt=0&rid=28811 __________________

6 April 2008, 03:11 AM	#2
frostie 1,000,000th PostMember Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 14,048	Thanks a lot for sharing the link __________________ GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN

6 April 2008, 03:54 AM	#5
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	Good stuff.....thanks for sharing. That watch would look fantastic on at least a 7¼" wrist or more. Does anyone have the exact case diameter of the new SD? Thanks - JJ __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

6 April 2008, 09:39 AM	#8
timackerman "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Tim Location: Calgary Posts: 1,117	I wonder why they chose 3900m to put on the dial if they tested up to 5000m!?!?! But then again I remember seeing something that said the Sub was tested to about 2000ft, and it was only around the 2000ft mark that the pressure caused the case back to bend, and would have caused the failure of the movement. I guess better safe then sorry! __________________ Daytona 116520

6 April 2008, 03:12 AM	#3
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Matt Dial!!!!

6 April 2008, 03:52 AM	#4
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	Thanks for info!!!

6 April 2008, 09:54 PM	#13
mickeydainish Banned Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Michael Location: LaLa Land Watch: Sub Date 16610 Posts: 1,757	gr8 info... tx for the link... I am liking the SDD more and more!!! :-)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)