ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 April 2008, 07:26 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Jon
Location: UK
Posts: 2,405
|
The new & the Icon
The new and the established icon tool
__________________
Whatever the watch, it's your wrist, it speaks to you, enjoy it |
7 April 2008, 07:29 AM | #2 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
I think the old looks cooler and i prefer it more even though i am not an SD fan
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
7 April 2008, 07:30 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
Only the new one even begins to help me like the old one...
|
7 April 2008, 07:35 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Watch: 116718 green
Posts: 1,944
|
guys guys you are crazy
__________________
|
7 April 2008, 07:39 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
I hear they have a change in mind. They forget to add NO BATTERY EITHER to the bezel.
|
7 April 2008, 11:35 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: willie
Location: pie hole
Watch: still looking
Posts: 924
|
i will buy this new SDDS if rolex take off the (original gas escape valve and ring lock system words)
|
7 April 2008, 09:18 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Honestly I love Both. SD is classic and SDDS is MONSTER.
|
7 April 2008, 09:37 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: David
Location: SW Fla
Watch: SS Daytona & TT DJ
Posts: 1,430
|
What's with the change in the depth rating from 4000m to 3900?
|
7 April 2008, 09:46 PM | #9 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
7 April 2008, 10:16 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Georgia
Watch: Stainless Sub Date
Posts: 3,023
|
I really love 'em both
__________________
SUBMARINER OWNERS' CLUB
ESTABLISHED 1953 TRF Member # 5464 |
8 April 2008, 12:11 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
No, David, it went from 1220m (4000 ft) to 3900m (12,800) ft. More than triple the depth! I doubt I'd ever even dive beyond 1220 INCHES! LOL
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
8 April 2008, 12:16 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: John
Location: Houston
Watch: Sea-dwller
Posts: 255
|
At $9K + they won't sell too many IMO. A big Omega or Breitling is @ 1/3 the $$$. At some point $$$$ affects sales...I'll bet this is the point.
|
8 April 2008, 12:48 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,824
|
I prefer the old SD. I just don't like a watch that big.
__________________
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." "So you have enemies. Good. You must have stood up for something, sometime in your life." Winston Churchill |
8 April 2008, 12:59 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Tim
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,117
|
I like some of the features of the new DSSD, but the dial is FAR too cluttered, and wtf is with that writing on the inner ring??
I think the SD would be the way to go. Can't go wrong with a classic
__________________
Daytona 116520 |
8 April 2008, 02:22 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Charlotte NC
Watch: SD & Exp II
Posts: 961
|
Quote:
You'll have some initial sales (latest/greatest) to folks, but I believe those sales will fall off rather quickly. I also believe Rolex is making a big mistake if the current SD is discontinued. There is too much of a price difference between the SD and the new SDDS for many folks to make the jump. I'm very happy with my Z series SD, so I see no reason to upgrade. As a matter of fact, for the difference in price between the two models I'd pick up a nice used IWC diver
__________________
16600 Sea-Dweller 16570 Explorer II (White Dial) |
|
8 April 2008, 02:27 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 2,480
|
With all of the writing on the face, the new SDDS looks like the GMT II that someone marked-up with all of the Rolex logos. IMO-Simple is/was better.
__________________
____________________________________________ Rolex Blue TT Submariner Rolex SS Submariner Breitling Emergency Mission **They are just watches, wear 'em.** ____________________________________________ |
8 April 2008, 02:29 AM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 414
|
|
8 April 2008, 02:37 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
|
I like them both.
I wish the original SD came with a Maxi-Dial like the LV... I wish the new DSSD did NOT have "ORIGINAL GAS ESCAPE VALVE" and "RING LOCK SYSTEM" on the ring lock... Having it on the case back is enough IMHO I also wish the "DEEP SEA" or "SEA DWELLER" were in RED You can't always get what you want... But I'll give Rolex a 95 out of 100 on the DSSD. I say it's a home run, one day I'll own one.
__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment |
8 April 2008, 02:50 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bay Area
Watch: 116520
Posts: 256
|
Quote:
I disagree. People have been paying over 10k on the grey market for Daytonas for the last 20 years, so the money is out there. The DS will have waiting lists for quite a while. The attitude of most consumers that buy Rolex in regards to the price, is "it is what it is". Most consumers do not know what the old price of the watches was, so the price on the tag is "normal". Pricing changes effect those that have been following the pricing of Rolex watches the most. IMHO As a side note, I don't think that the writing on the ring is very visible in reality. Keep in mind that you are seeing pictures of this watch blown up. There are quite a few things more visible in pictures that are quite subtle when the watch is on your wrist. The most recent example was the engraved reflector rings. I believe that that was met with resentment when the photos were released.
__________________
The Mole "Time is inseparable from existence for us ... It enables the real world not simply to be, but to become." Prof. Albert Facquard Inaugural Conference of the 12th International Chronometer Congress, October 2004. |
|
8 April 2008, 03:03 AM | #20 |
-
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Erwin
Location: Hollywood, Ca
Watch: SD
Posts: 1,032
|
they both look good!
__________________
Your watch silently speaks about your character! sd/datejust/tudor/a couple of vintage omegas/tissotMB Meisterstuck Bordeaux pen/MB Noblesse Oblige/Starwalker/MB Classique Fountain pen/MB no 149 |
8 April 2008, 03:07 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
Quote:
+ 4 To me, if I am spending that much money on a diver, I'm gonna buy the Blancpain FF or the IWC. The current model SD won out because it is top notch, classic tool watch at a great price. Now it is competing with a hole different group of divers and to me, it will lose out. Before people would compare the SD to the Omega PO, now they are going to compare the DS to IWC and Blancpain divers. |
|
8 April 2008, 05:36 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: John
Location: Nashville, TN
Watch: S/S GMT Master IIc
Posts: 1,210
|
Just not a big SD fan. Nice watch but not one I will be looking to purchase. If I come across one at a good price, I'll be sure to let everyone know.
|
8 April 2008, 09:34 AM | #23 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,917
|
in production. not a lot more to say. market will stabilize fair market value pricing, just like Daytona's, GMT II-c's, (new) Milgauss', to include the new DSSD.
best, dan |
8 April 2008, 09:50 AM | #24 | |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,588
|
Quote:
O.K. Rolex has for decades printed the model on the dial, but this new lock ring script is really gone too far. I can't work out whether the new text on the lock ring is the result of: (a) a lack of respect by Rolex towards the intelligence of its customers and/or potential customers; (b) a Rolex designer who grew up wearing G-Shock Casios; (c) a frustrated marketing executive at Rolex with a 'great idea'; (d) a Rolex executive who has a personal need to tell himself 2 attributes about the watch so he can feel good every time he looks at it. I'm not disrespecting the achievements accomplished by the new SDD but this kind of in your face advertising/self promotion does cheapen the overall style and professionalism of the watch and brand.
__________________
Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim |
|
8 April 2008, 10:11 AM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
Regards, Mike
__________________
Rolex SS Daytona x 2, Milgauss GV, SD, Deep Sea; Breitling Montbrillant Olympus, Navitimer Fighters x 2, SOHC LE, Bentley GT LE, Lemans LE Muhle Glashutte Horch LE, Oris Carlos Coste LE Chrono Ernst Benz Chronoscope, M Lacroix Dble Retrograde GMT, |
|
8 April 2008, 11:30 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Tony
Location: Buffalo
Watch: 16613 (blue dial)
Posts: 1,329
|
Both are great watches. I would really, really, really love the DSSD if not for that infernal lock ring marketing...
|
8 April 2008, 11:38 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Henry
Location: Singapore
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 138
|
makes me feel really lucky that i bought the SD in jan instead of waiting for basel.
|
8 April 2008, 11:39 AM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 19
|
43mm is good, convexed crystal is good too. Now they just need to anti glare coat it both sides.
|
8 April 2008, 10:21 PM | #29 |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,588
|
That's a good point, I wonder if there is in fact any anti-reflection coating on the crystal. The matt dial is another +ve that I welcome.
__________________
Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim |
8 April 2008, 11:02 PM | #30 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: Home and Away
Watch: you? "YES PLEASE"!
Posts: 3,719
|
would have loved to see something e;se new come from rolex!
__________________
it's not just about telling the time... happy rolexing... I'm just a man with a passion
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.