The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 January 2015, 03:01 PM   #1
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
Which Watch Brand Spends the Most on Advertising?

Watch brands spent almost half a billion dollars on advertising in the U.S in 2013. The total was $492.68 million: a record high, and up 23.3 percent from the 2012 total. That figure comes from Kantar Media, which each year compiles estimates of ad spending for a range of different products. The figures for 2013 signal that the U.S. watch market is still growing, especially as Swiss luxury brands turn their sights back from China to this country.


RANK BRAND AMOUNT ($million)
1. Rolex 61.48
2. Breitling 43.85
3. Cartier 24.58
4. Omega 22.96
5. TAG Heuer 22.00
6. Citizen 20.72
7. Movado 19.83
8. Chanel 17.87
9. Longines 16.02
10. Seiko 11.15
11. Breguet 9.58
12. Tudor 8.24
13. Patek Philippe 7.66
14. Hublot 7.59
15. Audemars Piguet 7.39
16. Bell & Ross 7.11
17. Dior 6.05
18. Swatch 6.05
19. Montblanc 5.64
20. Ball Watch 5.37
21. Armitron 5.35
22. Chopard 5.20
23. Rado 4.95
24. Baume & Mercier 4.92
25. Shinola 4.66
26. Parmigiani 4.62
27. Raymond Weil 4.51
28. Ulysse Nardin 4.50
29. IWC 4.02
30. Vacheron Constantin 4.01
31. Zenith 4.01
32. Harry Winston 3.80
33. Louis Vuitton 3.73
34. Casio 3.65
35. Luminox 3.62
36. Tissot 3.46
37. Oris 3.42
38. Timex 3.19
39. Bulova 2.97
40. David Yurman 2.91
41. Garmin 2.67
42. Fendi 2.67
43. Coach 2.65
44. Panerai 2.59
45. Glashütte Original 2.54
46. Victorinox 2.52
47. Girard-Perregaux 2.42
48. MTM 2.34
49. Fossil 2.30
50. Ralph Lauren 2.26
51. Piaget 2.15
52. Jaeger-LeCoultre 2.14
53. Anne Klein 2.12
54. Michele 2.05
55. Richard Mille 2.05
56. Bulgari 1.95
57. Blancpain 1.78
58. Carl F. Bucherer 1.67
59. Graff 1.59
60. Pulsar 1.38
61. Stauer 1.37
62. ALOR 1.34
63. Ebel 1.33
64. Emporio Armani 1.33
65. Gucci 1.25
66. Kenneth Cole 1.22
67. Frédérique Constant 1.08
68. Hamilton 1.01
69. Jorg Gray 1.00

http://www.watchtime.com/wristwatch-...ising-in-2013/
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2015, 03:05 PM   #2
SUBversive
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
Interesting list

I would have thought Michael Kors would be first.
SUBversive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2015, 03:09 PM   #3
Laszlo
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Laszlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: Date & No Date
Posts: 10,868
Interesting about Patek's placement, guess those beauties pretty much sell themselves.
__________________
"You might as well question why we breathe. If we stop breathing, we'll die. If we stop fighting our enemies, the world will die."

Paul Henreid as Victor Laszlo in Casablanca
Laszlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2015, 03:59 PM   #4
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Do these figures include sponsorship?
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 12:18 AM   #5
ippon20
2024 Pledge Member
 
ippon20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: Orlando/NSB, FL
Watch: 16710 (3186)
Posts: 1,629
Funny thing was when I worked for one of the top 5 (not rolex) the Corporate office always said, the only reason Rolex does so well is because the spend so much on advertising. Then you see something like this and I just have to laugh at the Koolaid that was being served.

I do not believe these figures include sponsorship.
__________________
Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas International GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018

Instagram @pivot_and_spine
ippon20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 02:56 AM   #6
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
I'm surprised Seiko spends that much... I guess they market outside of my sphere of attention because I don't see it.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 03:00 AM   #7
wisguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
Would be interesting to have production or sales volume, to know how much the spend "per unit" and have a real comparison, otherwise it's hard to tell who spends the most.

Ideally we would need to know how much each brand spends as a % of revenue, that is the true measure in my mind.
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation
wisguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 03:45 AM   #8
yjfang
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: JF
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680
Posts: 1,426
FP Journe not on that list yet it is one of the most respected brands, and up there with the holy trinity.
yjfang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 04:09 AM   #9
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
One question: Has advertising ever led you to one of your watch purchases? For me easy answer no never not even once. Now TRF threads and posts and enabling different story.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 04:12 AM   #10
jjnd08
"TRF" Member
 
jjnd08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
One question: Has advertising ever led you to one of your watch purchases? For me easy answer no never not even once. Now TRF threads and posts and enabling different story.
Definitely agree with this. But I have seen some watch ads that have made me research a watch more, but I haven't purchased any.
jjnd08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 05:11 AM   #11
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by yjfang View Post
FP Journe not on that list yet it is one of the most respected brands, and up there with the holy trinity.
They spend, relatively, very little on marketing from what I've seen. Not that there's any correlation between horological prestige and marketing spend.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 05:23 AM   #12
bradj
"TRF" Member
 
bradj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: 116610LN 116613LB
Posts: 359
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
One question: Has advertising ever led you to one of your watch purchases? For me easy answer no never not even once. Now TRF threads and posts and enabling different story.
Subliminal advertising.. I bought my sub because I picture myself looking like this:


bradj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 06:09 AM   #13
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
One question: Has advertising ever led you to one of your watch purchases?
Watches? No but Michael Jordan convinced me on the merits of Hanes tagless t-shirts.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 07:01 AM   #14
jdog19
"TRF" Member
 
jdog19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 134
Interesting, since the only real advertising I see are the sporting event sponsorships. I must need to get out more or watch more tv
jdog19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 07:24 AM   #15
rolexnub
"TRF" Member
 
rolexnub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Me & Papa
Location: Echo
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 3,428
I am suprised PP spends less than Seiko.
It would be nice to see a list as to how much the different watch companies are earning (net profit).
rolexnub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 09:30 AM   #16
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexnub View Post
I am suprised PP spends less than Seiko.
It would be nice to see a list as to how much the different watch companies are earning (net profit).
I am not at all in fact I'd even expect they would be lower. Not sure what they would gain from more advertising as they are who they are and all looking for watches at that level are very much aware. They are never going to be a mass marketer or producer and are a niche watch company with a niche market. The Stern family has built Patek into a multi billion dollar business while keeping it privately owned. They have kept the focus on high quality and cater to top end of the watch market. Companies that spend a ton on advertising are looking to keep growing their market share and clearly sell more product. That is a far different strategy than Patek who can only make so many watches a year unlike Rolex who can crank out close to a million. Different strategy--different business model and different market. Neither is wrong and both work fine and together for me as a collector I need not look anywhere else. So long answer to I am not surprised Patek spends less than Seiko.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 09:35 AM   #17
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Watches? No but Michael Jordan convinced me on the merits of Hanes tagless t-shirts.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 09:36 AM   #18
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
Do these figures include sponsorship?
Good question, the same thought crossed my mind. The figure for Rolex seemed low to me
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 09:40 AM   #19
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
Good question, the same thought crossed my mind. The figure for Rolex seemed low to me
It can't look at AP's number and Richard Mille.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 09:42 AM   #20
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
It can't look at AP's number and Richard Mille.
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 12:29 PM   #21
otisc
"TRF" Member
 
otisc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: 116610LV HULK
Posts: 639
Does this ad budget include marketing? Because TAG spends a small fortune on hiring ambassadors.
otisc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 02:50 PM   #22
wisguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
Ok, so I scoured the net for production volumes, right or wrong these are ballpark figures and somehow directionally correct, I believe they shed much better light on who is spending the most:

Brand Watches produced Marketing Budget $ Per watch $
Seiko 12,000,000 11,150,000 1
Tissot 2,500,000 3,460,000 1
B&M 200,000 4,920,000 25
Longines 600,000 16,020,000 27
TAG 750,000 22,000,000 29
Omega 750,000 22,960,000 31
Panerai 75,000 2,590,000 35
JLC 60,000 2,140,000 36
IWC 75,000 4,020,000 54
Rolex 1,000,000 61,480,000 61
Montblanc 75,000 5,640,000 75
Bell & Ross 90,000 7,110,000 79
Carl F. Bucherer 20,000 1,670,000 84
Piaget 20,000 2,150,000 108
Zenith 25,000 4,010,000 160
Blancpain 10,000 1,780,000 178
Ulysse Nardin 25,000 4,500,000 180
Patek 40,000 7,660,000 192
Vacheron Constantin 20,000 4,000,000 200
AP 30,000 7,390,000 246
Cartier 100,000 24,850,000 249
GO 10,000 2,540,000 254
Breitling 160,000 43,850,000 274
Breguet 25,000 9,580,000 383

In the abscence of marketing expense as a % of revenue I believe this a better measure than an absolute number.

Some of this numbers are surprising, don't you think?
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation
wisguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 07:47 PM   #23
engin33r
"TRF" Member
 
engin33r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Andy
Location: GMT +7
Watch: Sub, Daytona, DD2
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by wisguy View Post
Ok, so I scoured the net for production volumes, right or wrong these are ballpark figures and somehow directionally correct, I believe they shed much better light on who is spending the most:

Brand Watches produced Marketing Budget $ Per watch $
Seiko 12,000,000 11,150,000 1
Tissot 2,500,000 3,460,000 1
B&M 200,000 4,920,000 25
Longines 600,000 16,020,000 27
TAG 750,000 22,000,000 29
Omega 750,000 22,960,000 31
Panerai 75,000 2,590,000 35
JLC 60,000 2,140,000 36
IWC 75,000 4,020,000 54
Rolex 1,000,000 61,480,000 61
Montblanc 75,000 5,640,000 75
Bell & Ross 90,000 7,110,000 79
Carl F. Bucherer 20,000 1,670,000 84
Piaget 20,000 2,150,000 108
Zenith 25,000 4,010,000 160
Blancpain 10,000 1,780,000 178
Ulysse Nardin 25,000 4,500,000 180
Patek 40,000 7,660,000 192
Vacheron Constantin 20,000 4,000,000 200
AP 30,000 7,390,000 246
Cartier 100,000 24,850,000 249
GO 10,000 2,540,000 254
Breitling 160,000 43,850,000 274
Breguet 25,000 9,580,000 383

In the abscence of marketing expense as a % of revenue I believe this a better measure than an absolute number.

Some of this numbers are surprising, don't you think?
Good one, this is a more proportional view on their spending. However, it would be better to actually measure their advertising budget against their revenues (in percentage). As the prices of those watches are vastly different.
engin33r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2015, 08:37 PM   #24
zama
"TRF" Member
 
zama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Craig
Location: Sydney
Watch: 4 Broken glass
Posts: 5,808
Accept this is US not global but I see a lot of Seiko, Citizen, TAG and Longines adverts here, so they would seem to have good value in my opinion, I am surprised any of the high end brands including AP, Breguet and PP spend anywhere near that amount as their buyers don't just stumble through advertising on those brands. Not to mention given their price points they can be very selective on where to advertise (ie financial journals etc). For a small company AP certainly have a number of high profile sports brand ambassadors.
__________________
Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST
Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed.....
Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze
zama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2015, 01:38 AM   #25
Scot_3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Scot
Location: USA
Watch: 1966 boyscout
Posts: 914
Wow you've put some time into this, thanks it is neat to see the figures.
So if a company adds X as a percent to the cost of a unit of inventory. Could it then predict an increase in sales based on an increase percent per unit of inventory. Or is limiting production in the face of market demand, as a way of pushing up the cost per unit of inventory a more cost effective means for adding profit. Ummmmmm,
__________________
Thanks Scot
Scot_3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2015, 04:39 AM   #26
wisguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scot_3 View Post
Wow you've put some time into this, thanks it is neat to see the figures.
So if a company adds X as a percent to the cost of a unit of inventory. Could it then predict an increase in sales based on an increase percent per unit of inventory. Or is limiting production in the face of market demand, as a way of pushing up the cost per unit of inventory a more cost effective means for adding profit. Ummmmmm,
I guess it depends on the brand, PP may want to maintain supply below demand to maintain exclusivity and raise prices. On the other hand Breitling could want to spend more in advertising and increase volume.

I read the entire 2013 Swatch group annual report yesterday and they do not disclose any figures by brand, only by category which makes it hard to arrive at any reasonable conclusions, same for the other brands.

And yeah, seems like I have a lot of time on my hands! I better get to work so I can afford all the watches I want...
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation
wisguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.