The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 31 May 2015, 12:26 AM   #1
J!m
"TRF" Member
 
J!m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: Connecticut
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 2,839
Does unlimited wealth diminish the alue of acquisition?

So a post on another thread got me thinking...

Let's say a pro footballer or have access to family wealth etc. where the value of the dollar is disproportionate to someone wo had to scrape the funds together for a luxury item the hard way...

I was just looking through old Heuer catalogues, and price points are very low (loking at 1970's list price) and thought, gee, if money value to me was like that... In other words, if it really didn't matter what the asking price was, would that item still be as valued to me as a posession?

If I did have unlimited wealth I'd still gravitate to the vintage pieces but I just post this as a somewhat introspective idea I guess.

Any thoughts on this?
J!m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 12:34 AM   #2
stnmikita
"TRF" Member
 
stnmikita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: East Coast
Posts: 254
I think it would definitely have an effect.

If I could go out and purchase whatever PP struck my fancy at the moment, I'm guessing I'd become quite bored with a new piece relatively quickly.

When a goal requires no effort, I believe it eventually ceases to satisfy. It's the only way I can understand why so many of the super-wealthy in our world seem to be so unhappy.
stnmikita is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 12:36 AM   #3
Naz737
"TRF" Member
 
Naz737's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Matt
Location: FL, USA
Watch: Sub 16610T
Posts: 715
Why am I thinking of the story where the rich kid (way back when) gets a horse and the poor kid gets a whistle... The poor kid is so enthralled with the whistle and the rich kid is jealous of the poor kid...

I guess I'm saying it depends on the person and how you choose to live your life... And based off of what's earned and what is valued... it will all be relative... But who is to say someone who is rich wouldn't appreciate what they have...

Depends what you value as a person and everyone's taste is different...
Naz737 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 12:38 AM   #4
MCO1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Missouri USA
Watch: Daytona C white
Posts: 2,248
I have often thought about this myself. I was at an AD in St Louis yesterday looking at many models that I am not currently in the market for but I wanted to see them. There was a gentleman in the store that was being well catered too, I could tell he was a regular client that was in looking and buying watches often, the fellow working with me said he could buy any watch that he wanted. It crossed my mind that does he get the same charge as I do when I have to be so selective. My guess would be yes to a certain degree, the appeal of watches is the appeal of watches.
MCO1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 01:36 AM   #5
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,356
I think with unlimited funds it requires the collector to go down a different path. You have different options and such. Also new watches are always being released and rare vintages always hard to find. This hobby suits any budget and that is part of what makes it great.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 01:50 AM   #6
ronin_ph
"TRF" Member
 
ronin_ph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 911
The wealthiest person in my family wears a $1,000 watch.

Sent from my SM-G9250 using Tapatalk
ronin_ph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 01:51 AM   #7
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Well if you can buy a handful vintage perpetual calendar Pateks before breakfast without noticing the cost I guess watch collecting would get really dull fast. But I'm only speculating.
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 01:53 AM   #8
AzPaul
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
AzPaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Paul
Location: Tucson, Az
Watch: Rolex 1501
Posts: 13,905
In Citizen Kane, as the wealthiest man in the world lay dying, the possession he valued most (**Spoiler ALERT**) was his childhood sled.
__________________
Ain't much of a crime, whacking a surly bartender
AzPaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 01:59 AM   #9
nilfire77
"TRF" Member
 
nilfire77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: On a lil island
Posts: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by J!m View Post
So a post on another thread got me thinking...

Let's say a pro footballer or have access to family wealth etc. where the value of the dollar is disproportionate to someone wo had to scrape the funds together for a luxury item the hard way...

I was just looking through old Heuer catalogues, and price points are very low (loking at 1970's list price) and thought, gee, if money value to me was like that... In other words, if it really didn't matter what the asking price was, would that item still be as valued to me as a posession?

If I did have unlimited wealth I'd still gravitate to the vintage pieces but I just post this as a somewhat introspective idea I guess.

Any thoughts on this?
Just to state an interesting point... Money can't get you any watch you want... For instance, you need to be interviewed by Thierry Stern (CEO of PP) if you wanna get your hands on a brand new $2.6 million Patek Grandmaster Chime.

In short, PP screens their buyers for their top end stuff to make sure they don't fall into the hands of the wrong people (read: Non-wis)....
nilfire77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 02:05 AM   #10
zeuloa
"TRF" Member
 
zeuloa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jose
Location: Here
Watch: SEA-DWELLER
Posts: 2,232
Does unlimited wealth diminish the alue of acquisition?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilfire77 View Post
Just to state an interesting point... Money can't get you any watch you want... For instance, you need to be interviewed by Thierry Stern (CEO of PP) if you wanna get your hands on a brand new $2.6 million Patek Grandmaster Chime.



In short, PP screens their buyers for their top end stuff to make sure they don't fall into the hands of the wrong people (read: Non-wis)....

I'm sure if Mr. Buffett suddenly decided to dive into watches and knocked on PP's door he would be sold any watch without much trouble...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
zeuloa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 02:46 AM   #11
HorologyK
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by stnmikita View Post
I think it would definitely have an effect.

If I could go out and purchase whatever PP struck my fancy at the moment, I'm guessing I'd become quite bored with a new piece relatively quickly.

When a goal requires no effort, I believe it eventually ceases to satisfy. It's the only way I can understand why so many of the super-wealthy in our world seem to be so unhappy.

Agree. I only purchase Patek now because I can't wear Rolex due to the heft and ubiquity. After going through six Rolex pieces, I've purchased several Patek's over the past two years and now just have one... 5167 on tropical. My daily and only piece. I could purchase any Patek or Rolex but choose just to have this one due to its superior comfort, under the radar look and clean dial.
HorologyK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 02:52 AM   #12
nilfire77
"TRF" Member
 
nilfire77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: On a lil island
Posts: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeuloa View Post
I'm sure if Mr. Buffett suddenly decided to dive into watches and knocked on PP's door he would be sold any watch without much trouble...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Ahhh... I have no doubts about that... Cos he ain't Justin Bieber...
nilfire77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 02:56 AM   #13
nilfire77
"TRF" Member
 
nilfire77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: On a lil island
Posts: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by HorologyK View Post
Agree. I only purchase Patek now because I can't wear Rolex due to the heft and ubiquity. After going through six Rolex pieces, I've purchased several Patek's over the past two years and now just have one... 5167 on tropical. My daily and only piece. I could purchase any Patek or Rolex but choose just to have this one due to its superior comfort, under the radar look and clean dial.
I envy your problem dude...
nilfire77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 03:13 AM   #14
stnmikita
"TRF" Member
 
stnmikita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: East Coast
Posts: 254
If someone needed to interview me prior to taking my $2.6 mil, that interview better include a parade, celebrity guest appearances, soft music, and delicious cheeses.
stnmikita is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 04:26 AM   #15
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
When it comes to unlimited wealth and the super rich it is more about exclusivity and the story one can tell others (usually other super rich folks) behind the item/experience/watch. That replaces the affordability issue the rest of us face.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 05:14 AM   #16
stnmikita
"TRF" Member
 
stnmikita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: East Coast
Posts: 254
I'd give a great deal of wealth for someone to add an "r" to "alue" in the original post.
stnmikita is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 05:21 AM   #17
Watch This
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: In your head
Watch: SS YMII
Posts: 1,619
A good friend of mine is worth a solid 30 million. He wears a plastic Timex and drives a Buick SUV.
Watch This is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 05:23 AM   #18
Tri-Tip
"TRF" Member
 
Tri-Tip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CA, USA
Watch: Out!!!
Posts: 6,474
It's all relative to your worth. I remember about 25 years ago, my boss purchased a CD Jukebox for his house. It held 100 CD's.

I went with him and his son to the local chain music store and together we picked out 100 CD's across all genres of music.

Went to pay, and it came to about $1,600. He pulled out cash to pay, and the cashier almost wet her pants, I don't think she had ever seen that much cash at one time.

Of course, back then her hourly wage was probably less than $5/hour, so that was a good 2-months pay to her.
Tri-Tip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 05:23 AM   #19
Great_mazinger
"TRF" Member
 
Great_mazinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Conus
Posts: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Watch This View Post
A good friend of mine is worth a solid 30 million. He wears a plastic Timex and drives a Buick SUV.
And that's why he has 30 million.
Great_mazinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 07:27 AM   #20
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,055
I don't know, but I'm ready to find out!
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 08:19 AM   #21
london_v
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: London
Watch: 124060
Posts: 316
Good thread. I'm a firm believer that to truly value something, you need to work for it. Whether that's a relationship, an item, a dream, etc. If money was on tap, I would buy and replace at will, and therefore disregard the hard work and achievement that would otherwise have gone into achieving the goal - that's the fun bit, right?
london_v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 09:14 AM   #22
Rock
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,850
In my experience most material acquisitions are most enjoyed before, at acquisition, or soon after. I'm thinking that the greater the capacity to acquire, the quicker the novelty wears off.
If you have 50 watches, there are probably a lot of them that you have totally forgotten about(?).
Not that I would know or am ever likely to know.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch.

Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..."
Rock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 09:20 AM   #23
zama
"TRF" Member
 
zama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Craig
Location: Sydney
Watch: 4 Broken glass
Posts: 5,808
For me I think the things that cost the most don't always give me the most utility.

I think you could still be passionate about something even if you had unlimited wealth.
__________________
Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST
Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed.....
Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze
zama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 03:07 PM   #24
jdmi32
"TRF" Member
 
jdmi32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Ky
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 16570
Posts: 2,362
A former baseball player named Dmitri Young was a huge baseball card collector. He focused on high grade rookie cards and his collection was beyond astounding. It did seem to me that after a certain point he was simply amassing cards rather than collecting for his own enjoyment.
jdmi32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 03:20 PM   #25
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
If one has "unlimited" funds, the act of buying for it's own sake would become pretty dull pretty fast. That's like an addiction and a rapidly increasing resistance.

However, a man with a passion who collects anything and has "unlimited" funds would be able to live a fantasy existence in terms of his passion.

Jay Leno is a good example of someone with lots of money who has a passion for cars. He's not just some shallow rich guy who's infatuated with cars and crazy in love with money and the stuff it buys.

Jean-Claude Biver has tons of money, but he has a passion for watches, besides being in the business, and he has a spectacular collection and when you hear him talk, it's obvious he's still quite passionate.

Like a lot of things in life, there's a huge difference between those who are shallow and those who are deep.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 03:26 PM   #26
Rock
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,850
The urge/motivation to collect or 'amass' can be a strong drive in itself.
Maybe the urge for 'individual pieces' becomes subsumed by 'The Collection' as an entity?
The 'Collection' becomes the satisfier rather than individual pieces.
It would be interesting to know how it is seen by people with big collections of things - cars, watches, jewellery, business acquisitions, wealth etc.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch.

Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..."
Rock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2015, 03:42 PM   #27
Ruud Van Driver
"TRF" Member
 
Ruud Van Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,926
Very good and thought-provoking thread. I have to work hard, v. hard, to be able to wear a Rolex, as I'm sure most on here do/have done.

Someone wrote on here a few months ago, a post along the lines of someone winning big in Vegas and then steaming into the nearest Rolex AD and asking for a gold Rolex, any one, don't care which. Can someone tell me where the fun and satisfaction would be in that, because I sure as heck can't see it.
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737

"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott
Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Ruud Van Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.