The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 August 2015, 06:58 PM   #1
Degas
"TRF" Member
 
Degas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Middle
Posts: 878
SD owners your watch can do this

Although my SD4K is about to dive only to a max depth of about 60M, it is good to know that:

"The design and actual availability of diver's watches certified for more than 1,000 m (3,281 ft) is not solely explicable by practical diving needs.

The diving depth record for actual off shore diving was achieved in 1988 by a team of professional divers of the Comex S.A. industrial deep-sea diving company performing pipe line connection exercises at a depth of 534 metres (1,752 ft) of seawater (msw) in the Mediterranean Sea. The diver's watches used were Rolex Sea-Dwellers.

In 1992 Comex diver Theo Mavrostomos achieved a record of 701 metres (2,300 ft) of seawater (msw) in an on shore hyperbaric chamber. He took 43 days to complete the dive. The watch used during this scientific record dive, where a hydrogen-helium-oxygen (hydreliox) gas mixture was used as breathing gas, was a Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 with a 1,220 m (4,000 ft) depth rating. Rolex used this achievement in advertising campaigns.[9][10][11][12][13]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolex_Sea_Dweller


"
Degas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2015, 07:09 PM   #2
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
Fun facts. The SD is such a solid reference!
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2015, 07:10 PM   #3
Rogdogg
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Rogdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
If you are about to go to 60m that is still pretty impressive. I once stood in a swimming pool with my Submariner, the poor thing! It will NEVER reach the depths it was intended to while on my wrist
__________________
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
Rogdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2015, 07:10 PM   #4
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by Degas View Post
Although my SD4K is about to dive only to a max depth of about 60M, it is good to know that:

"The design and actual availability of diver's watches certified for more than 1,000 m (3,281 ft) is not solely explicable by practical diving needs.

The diving depth record for actual off shore diving was achieved in 1988 by a team of professional divers of the Comex S.A. industrial deep-sea diving company performing pipe line connection exercises at a depth of 534 metres (1,752 ft) of seawater (msw) in the Mediterranean Sea. The diver's watches used were Rolex Sea-Dwellers.

In 1992 Comex diver Theo Mavrostomos achieved a record of 701 metres (2,300 ft) of seawater (msw) in an on shore hyperbaric chamber. He took 43 days to complete the dive. The watch used during this scientific record dive, where a hydrogen-helium-oxygen (hydreliox) gas mixture was used as breathing gas, was a Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 with a 1,220 m (4,000 ft) depth rating. Rolex used this achievement in advertising campaigns.[9][10][11][12][13]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolex_Sea_Dweller


"

I believe the open circuit scuba depth record is around 1000 fsw. IIRC, the rapid descent caused HPNS tremors and he had trouble keeping his reg in his mouth. I don't know whether he was wearing a watch or not, but a Sub would probably have survived the dive.

My Explorer has been to 65 m with no troubles. I doubt I'll be taking my SD to 65% of its' crush depth
Abdullah71601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2015, 07:12 PM   #5
Degas
"TRF" Member
 
Degas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Middle
Posts: 878
I'm blind!! just saw THIS DSSD in the same link
Attached Images
 
Degas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2015, 07:28 PM   #6
ratty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Graham
Location: UK
Watch: Daytonas and Subs
Posts: 2,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by Degas View Post
Although my SD4K is about to dive only to a max depth of about 60M, it is good to know that:

"The design and actual availability of diver's watches certified for more than 1,000 m (3,281 ft) is not solely explicable by practical diving needs.

The diving depth record for actual off shore diving was achieved in 1988 by a team of professional divers of the Comex S.A. industrial deep-sea diving company performing pipe line connection exercises at a depth of 534 metres (1,752 ft) of seawater (msw) in the Mediterranean Sea. The diver's watches used were Rolex Sea-Dwellers.

In 1992 Comex diver Theo Mavrostomos achieved a record of 701 metres (2,300 ft) of seawater (msw) in an on shore hyperbaric chamber. He took 43 days to complete the dive. The watch used during this scientific record dive, where a hydrogen-helium-oxygen (hydreliox) gas mixture was used as breathing gas, was a Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 with a 1,220 m (4,000 ft) depth rating. Rolex used this achievement in advertising campaigns.[9][10][11][12][13]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolex_Sea_Dweller


"

Speaking as someone who is careful about how deep his bath water is, can someone answer a couple of questions for me please?

1 Any idea about how much a deep-sea diver is paid by the likes of Comex?

and

2 In the description above about the 701 m 'dive', does the fact that it was done in an on shore hyperbaric chamber actually mean that the 'dive' was not in water but in a pressure changer on land? If so, are these 'dives' done just to test humans and equipment or is there another reason for doing this? 43 days locked in a steel box, wow!
ratty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2015, 07:30 PM   #7
whysleep
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: california
Watch: 116610LV/SD4000
Posts: 209
It might get your watch scratched, don't dive with it!!
whysleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2015, 09:02 PM   #8
RolexAuthority
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: London
Posts: 1,233
The DeepSea will do an astonishing 3.9km!!!! Wow
RolexAuthority is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2015, 09:11 PM   #9
leicashot
"TRF" Member
 
leicashot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne
Watch: SEIKO SLA033
Posts: 665
My old SD went pretty deep as you can see, and never skipped a beat!

leicashot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2015, 09:25 PM   #10
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratty View Post
Speaking as someone who is careful about how deep his bath water is, can someone answer a couple of questions for me please?

1 Any idea about how much a deep-sea diver is paid by the likes of Comex?

and

2 In the description above about the 701 m 'dive', does the fact that it was done in an on shore hyperbaric chamber actually mean that the 'dive' was not in water but in a pressure changer on land? If so, are these 'dives' done just to test humans and equipment or is there another reason for doing this? 43 days locked in a steel box, wow!
Commercial divers are paid pretty well. There's at least one TRF member who is a current diver, perhaps he'll weigh in.

A chamber dive is a test dive under very controlled conditions. The 'diver' is stressed at the same pressures as would be achieved in water, without all the logistics of a wet dive. However, chamber dives do not correlate exactly to in water dives. They do provide excellent data for saturation diving physiology that can be used to prepare for wet dives.

The descent rates (blow down rates), decompression rates, and other safety and physiological parameters were determined largely in the chamber, then tested in water.
Abdullah71601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2015, 10:10 PM   #11
Gerry62
"TRF" Member
 
Gerry62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy EU
Watch: Rolex Panerai
Posts: 7,504
507 mt Comex
Gerry62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 12:26 AM   #12
eonflux
"TRF" Member
 
eonflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by Degas View Post
Although my SD4K is about to dive only to a max depth of about 60M, it is good to know that:

"The design and actual availability of diver's watches certified for more than 1,000 m (3,281 ft) is not solely explicable by practical diving needs.

The diving depth record for actual off shore diving was achieved in 1988 by a team of professional divers of the Comex S.A. industrial deep-sea diving company performing pipe line connection exercises at a depth of 534 metres (1,752 ft) of seawater (msw) in the Mediterranean Sea. The diver's watches used were Rolex Sea-Dwellers.

In 1992 Comex diver Theo Mavrostomos achieved a record of 701 metres (2,300 ft) of seawater (msw) in an on shore hyperbaric chamber. He took 43 days to complete the dive. The watch used during this scientific record dive, where a hydrogen-helium-oxygen (hydreliox) gas mixture was used as breathing gas, was a Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 with a 1,220 m (4,000 ft) depth rating. Rolex used this achievement in advertising campaigns.[9][10][11][12][13]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolex_Sea_Dweller


"
That is really cool!
Thanks for posting.
eonflux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 03:18 AM   #13
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
Hmm...guess I need one now.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 03:34 AM   #14
ratty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Graham
Location: UK
Watch: Daytonas and Subs
Posts: 2,810
So does anyone know how much more pressure the diver and watch are under at 700m compared to at sea level?
ratty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 03:42 AM   #15
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
yep , every 10m is one bar ,,,, and add one for surface pressure ,,,
all these deep dives are very good , but did anyone look for condensation or water damage to their watch at the end ,,,
i can think of one thread here that would not agree with some of the above.
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 03:46 AM   #16
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
oops , forgot the answer , 72 x15.6 = 1123 psi , thats 11x the pressure in a truck tyre.
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 04:00 AM   #17
ratty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Graham
Location: UK
Watch: Daytonas and Subs
Posts: 2,810
1123 psi wow!

I had no idea that the human body could survive such pressures!

Do you know what the max pressure is the body can stand?
ratty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 04:16 AM   #18
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratty View Post
1123 psi wow!

I had no idea that the human body could survive such pressures!

Do you know what the max pressure is the body can stand?
the bods quite an amazing bit of kit , as the divers here will tell you , its the airspaces that make things tricky , inner ear , lungs sinus etc , as long as they are equalized the body can stand a lot of abuse , we are mostly water after all , and water is only compressed by , one half of one percent [ by volume] per thousand psi ,,, but it only takes a one psi differential between inner and outer ear to burst an ear drum... an average dive say 30m has the divers bod at 4 bar , thats aprox 60 psi , or twice whats in your car tyre.
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 04:17 AM   #19
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
heres anther interesting thought ,,,, the record for longest breath hold , last time i checked was




























over 20 mins.... now thats amazing
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 04:40 AM   #20
ratty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Graham
Location: UK
Watch: Daytonas and Subs
Posts: 2,810
I take it we are still talking about humans and not whales?
ratty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 04:45 AM   #21
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratty View Post
I take it we are still talking about humans and not whales?
yep ,,, saw the guy doing the record on tv ,,, they do it in a pool to get the best of the human dive response , ie being dunked in water slows down just about everything heart metabolism and the likes , it was quite an amazing feat to see , its probably on u tube
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 05:15 AM   #22
tkerrmd
"TRF" Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
great watch, no doubt!
tkerrmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2015, 05:52 AM   #23
Wcdhtwn
"TRF" Member
 
Wcdhtwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 5,061
I've been trying to talk myself out of one... you're not helping.
Wcdhtwn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.