The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 August 2015, 10:23 PM   #91
Garby81
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Italy
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garby81 View Post
Trust me guy, I'm very happy to see some FC case without any issues, but I think it's only a matter of time, I mean that when last december I received back my bee it was apparently perfect, and I never tried to scratch it with my nail before I've seen the edge became moldy by itself. Two different cases ruined by themselves aren't a case, but a native structural defect, because forged carbon has not to be used for watch cases.
I use to look at my watch, every watch, about 50 days a day, I love my watch and especially my bee. Unfortunately for my second consecutive vacation I've realized that something was going wrong about the case, I just haven't tried to ruin the case with a small nail pressure but it was just a test after I've seen one of its 90° edges was already flacked off by itself just wearing day by day my watch.
A case of a 35.000 $ watch would never be compared to leather or to any soft material, it has to be resistant and cannot be forgiven these kind of mistakes by AP, neither a 10 $ plastic watch.

That's all
Garby81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2015, 01:42 AM   #92
bondtoys
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,733
"FC is an inadequate material for a watch case. It's soft, wears- off easily and is known not to last"

While I doubt the long- lasting part - everything else could also be said about gold alloys.
And how about that white RM layered quartz case?

Each to his own, I for my part am happy that FC watches exist - even if everyone of them would have the issues drawn out in the initial post.
bondtoys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2015, 01:52 AM   #93
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ S View Post
Yes, but did you bother to read mine in its entirety?
Here's the salient point you seem to've missed.
I am not interested in picking up an Internet fight so this all for the sake of a good discussion. I owned the 44 FC twice and it seemed solid if unevenly finished. I did not own either long enough to have a factual opinion.

I am the first one to tell you that AP's QC is terribly inconsistent (I just had my dial replaced on a brand new SS 26400). Thankfully, their service is above average so they will take care of any issues. It is very likely that with such tight tolerances in the manufacturing process some lemons will make it all the way to the finished product, especially considering that their QC is not that great even for less challenging items.

As stated by owners (Mike, Jim and a couple others here) I would not say the material is unsuitable. What happened to Garby is terrible (I am sure AP will fix as many times as needed) but it does not seem to be the case with the majority. After all, you definitely do not see many for sale from disgruntled owners.

I don't have a pony in this race as I do not own any FC anymore. I just think they are very special and different pieces, though maybe not for everybody.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2015, 02:07 AM   #94
beer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Watch Dealer atm!
Watch: all
Posts: 2,800
another point worth mentioning is that people say if you feel uncomfortable wearing a gold sports watch due to possible damage then you cannot afford to own it so maybe the same applies to forged carbon i.e. yes it does chip away when bashed but it is aimed at an even richer clientele who could not care less if their watch starts to disintegrate
beer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2015, 03:11 AM   #95
sturgeon123456
"TRF" Member
 
sturgeon123456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by masterserg View Post
I am not interested in picking up an Internet fight so this all for the sake of a good discussion. I owned the 44 FC twice and it seemed solid if unevenly finished. I did not own either long enough to have a factual opinion.

I am the first one to tell you that AP's QC is terribly inconsistent (I just had my dial replaced on a brand new SS 26400). Thankfully, their service is above average so they will take care of any issues. It is very likely that with such tight tolerances in the manufacturing process some lemons will make it all the way to the finished product, especially considering that their QC is not that great even for less challenging items.

As stated by owners (Mike, Jim and a couple others here) I would not say the material is unsuitable. What happened to Garby is terrible (I am sure AP will fix as many times as needed) but it does not seem to be the case with the majority. After all, you definitely do not see many for sale from disgruntled owners.

I don't have a pony in this race as I do not own any FC anymore. I just think they are very special and different pieces, though maybe not for everybody.
Extremely well said!

On another note I personally don't own any forged carbon AP watches but man is it ever a beautiful looking material
sturgeon123456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2015, 03:16 AM   #96
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
I love this thread because on another one which was about the FC diver I said the watch looked really cool but I ruled it out because the car was FC and was known to not be resistant, 2 members said that I shouldn't talk about what I didn't know and things like this, basically calling me an idiot, yeah right, FC never has any worries, unfortunately it does and to often it seems, too bad as the idea of a super lightweight material is kinda cool, don't know about RM FC but I would tend to think that at those prices they found a way to make it tear and wear resistant, but not sure, of course when you see how they make it it's not a huge surprise if it's not as resistant as should be, and for those who say gold is also soft and all, well maybe but with gold you can bring it back to the original shape, even add some gold if needed, with FC no way you can fix any problem, need to change the part, not cool….
It's not the first time that a watch process goes wrong, when Panerai started the PVD cases they were very prone to scratches and looked terrible, they even proposed clients their money back or the same watch in SS, PVD is crap, DLC is much better, and there are other examples...
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2015, 03:55 AM   #97
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by sturgeon123456 View Post
Extremely well said!

On another note I personally don't own any forged carbon AP watches but man is it ever a beautiful looking material
In my humble opinion ... Nothing beats it when you are out there in the sunshine. It is simply amazing.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2015, 04:32 AM   #98
sturgeon123456
"TRF" Member
 
sturgeon123456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by masterserg View Post
In my humble opinion ... Nothing beats it when you are out there in the sunshine. It is simply amazing.
Yes I had the opportunity to handle one in person recently, prior to that I formed my opinions on photos only....big mistake.

LOVE how it looks and it has so much character!
sturgeon123456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2015, 04:54 AM   #99
SMD
"TRF" Member
 
SMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,701
Quote:
Originally Posted by beer View Post
another point worth mentioning is that people say if you feel uncomfortable wearing a gold sports watch due to possible damage then you cannot afford to own it so maybe the same applies to forged carbon i.e. yes it does chip away when bashed but it is aimed at an even richer clientele who could not care less if their watch starts to disintegrate
This is nonsense. No matter how much money I have I don't want to spend 30,000+ on a watch and have the case fall apart (not saying that is what is happening with FC, I love FC, just addressing the point in this post)
SMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2015, 05:18 AM   #100
sturgeon123456
"TRF" Member
 
sturgeon123456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMD View Post
This is nonsense. No matter how much money I have I don't want to spend 30,000+ on a watch and have the case fall apart (not saying that is what is happening with FC, I love FC, just addressing the point in this post)
I agree, I believe the quality should be apparent and not suffer from defect that you may see from an inexpensive department store watch. I am not saying anything particular to Forged Carbon, however just commenting on the generic statement made.
sturgeon123456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2015, 10:25 AM   #101
Joe.King
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Joe
Location: Florida
Watch: AP
Posts: 199
SS you whack it it dents. Ceramic you drop it probably will break. Lets just say FC is a unique type of material and call it a day.
Joe.King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2015, 01:04 PM   #102
Ilianto Wirawan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 7
I have Ap fc diver and wear it for more than 1 year now almost daily, so far so good. Yes it could scratch and no, I never use my finger to scratch it. Over all I am really happy with this material.
I suspect that the bee's replacement case was still from the same batch with the old know how of forging, since then, AP improve the way cf forged and I believe the next batch of casings is where the improvement are.
My 2 cents
Ilianto Wirawan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2015, 05:52 PM   #103
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe.King View Post
SS you whack it it dents. Ceramic you drop it probably will break. Lets just say FC is a unique type of material and call it a day.
well ceramic is resistant, don't think AP ceramic will break just by dropping it, but won't test that statement
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2015, 07:47 PM   #104
abnerc15
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: singapore
Posts: 292
I have owned a FC ROO 44mm and whilst I loved the look and feel of the watch I had to let it go at a significantly reduced price cause I suffered the same issues posted by others on the forum... Maybe, as some have tried to justify, I was one of the unlucky few who got a bad piece that slipped through QC.
I have since owned the SS44 and the Ceramic diver and no issues with these whatsoever... Right now on the hunt for another AP to add.... I really love the brand but no more FC watches for me though...
abnerc15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 02:04 AM   #105
Joe.King
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Joe
Location: Florida
Watch: AP
Posts: 199
I had the Omega DSOTM. Awesome watch. I love ceramic.
Joe.King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2015, 03:30 PM   #106
mickyd329
"TRF" Member
 
mickyd329's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Socal
Watch: AP/PP/Rolex
Posts: 2,051
I've owned mine for 3 months now. So far no issues. I hope I don't run into the same problems.
mickyd329 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2015, 06:58 PM   #107
Hound
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 222
Interesting to note that 2 AP royal oak offshore watches are in contention in their categories at the Grand Prix d'horlogerie. Surprise surprise. Both watches are Carbon fibre. I guess AP don't think they've got a problem with carbon fibre per se.
Hound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2015, 09:03 PM   #108
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
GDdH don't worry about or test long term durability, so AP recognising they've a problem or not is completely irrelevant.
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2015, 12:50 AM   #109
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ S View Post
GDdH don't worry about or test long term durability, so AP recognising they've a problem or not is completely irrelevant.
PJ, which FC piece/pieces do you own (or have owned), and what exactly were the problems you have/had with Them?
Thanks.
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2015, 02:26 AM   #110
Koi6715
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Uk
Posts: 192
3 yrs the case and the bevel edges perfect not a scratch or dent my watch is like the day it left the boutique
Attached Images
 
Koi6715 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2015, 03:10 AM   #111
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Koi6715 View Post
3 yrs the case and the bevel edges perfect not a scratch or dent my watch is like the day it left the boutique
Well as far as I understand some stay perfect and some start to fall apart in 8 months, even with a replacement case often it's the same problem, I don't know what % of FC watches hold and which doesn't but the fact that some don't shouldn't be IMO...
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2015, 03:26 AM   #112
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by lapince View Post
Well as far as I understand some stay perfect and some start to fall apart in 8 months, even with a replacement case often it's the same problem, I don't know what % of FC watches hold and which doesn't but the fact that some don't shouldn't be IMO...
Some or ONE?
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2015, 03:30 AM   #113
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manofsteelpt View Post
Some or ONE?
Why do you even bother?
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2015, 03:44 AM   #114
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by masterserg View Post
Why do you even bother?
Idk, Serg... I guess I don't like them getting a bad rap because of 1 bad apple and ppl JUST reading and not actually owning. I've bit my tongue for a few days, figured I'd dip back in, lol.

Hope all is well my man
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2015, 04:22 AM   #115
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manofsteelpt View Post
Idk, Serg... I guess I don't like them getting a bad rap because of 1 bad apple and ppl JUST reading and not actually owning. I've bit my tongue for a few days, figured I'd dip back in, lol.

Hope all is well my man
Ha! I know exactly how you feel!

All is peachy brother.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2015, 04:46 AM   #116
sturgeon123456
"TRF" Member
 
sturgeon123456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manofsteelpt View Post
Idk, Serg... I guess I don't like them getting a bad rap because of 1 bad apple and ppl JUST reading and not actually owning. I've bit my tongue for a few days, figured I'd dip back in, lol.

Hope all is well my man
Quote:
Originally Posted by masterserg View Post
Ha! I know exactly how you feel!

All is peachy brother.
Sucks when people pile on in a forum when a simple google search would reveal hundreds of examples on various forums.

Love how the stuff looks, great material however there is zero reason to give a guy a hard time for stating fact.

You guys own them, great, you haven't had problems....even better.

But others have...just like we all have the same movement and some have had issues others not.

All I'm saying is that there is a higher occurance of case issues with forged carbon reported on the Internet than any other materials out there and the OP is far from the only "one"
sturgeon123456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2015, 05:07 AM   #117
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
Nobody is piling up on anybody. I just don't get it though ... there are issues ... sure, probably ... and AP will fix every time.

It is odd that people value anonymous internet factoids over facts stated by known forum members as it can be seen in this very thread (and I am not talking about myself but other actual owners that posted above). All of a sudden ... FC's shelf life is 8 months ... hilarious. Maybe AP should update the specs on the site.

In any case, I am done. People can buy it or not ... I couldn't care less.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2015, 10:26 AM   #118
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by masterserg View Post
Nobody is piling up on anybody. I just don't get it though ... there are issues ... sure, probably ... and AP will fix every time.

It is odd that people value anonymous internet factoids over facts stated by known forum members as it can be seen in this very thread (and I am not talking about myself but other actual owners that posted above). All of a sudden ... FC's shelf life is 8 months ... hilarious. Maybe AP should update the specs on the site.

In any case, I am done. People can buy it or not ... I couldn't care less.
My man!

Oh and Sturgeon... Please give me the key words you used to google and come up with "hundreds" of these so called examples. Thanks!
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.