ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 September 2015, 08:32 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Europe
Watch: Rolex Deep Blue
Posts: 316
|
seamaster?
|
27 September 2015, 09:38 PM | #32 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,787
|
Tudor for me hands down. I bought the Pelagos Blue when it was first released about 1 month ago. It is a great wearing watch and it keeps plus 1 second time a day so far.
|
28 September 2015, 12:04 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 535
|
Depends on how you'll wear it IMHO. The Pelagos is a bit more casual and tool-like, The Breitling is a bit more dressy, especially on the mesh bracelet. Can't go wrong either way though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
28 September 2015, 01:36 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Watch Dealer atm!
Watch: all
Posts: 2,800
|
for $500 i would go for a Tudor over a breitling, but to be fair i don't know anything about breitling. i am sure there is nothing wrong with it!!
__________________
|
28 September 2015, 04:29 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
Brad, hands down the Pelagos. Because:
Good looks. Snowflake hands and markers are a breath of fresh air. Comfort. Titanium feels fantastic on the wrist...clasp is adjustable, too, so a perfect fit. Lume. Crazy. Movement. Exceptional time keeping...70 hour power reserve. Wrist presence. 42mm, the perfect size. Yet with the titanium build, very wearable. The list goes on and on...did I mention I was a fan? Seriously, can't recommend this one enough. Good luck, |
28 September 2015, 04:40 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: In the water
Posts: 204
|
Mmmm...... Tudor. Also, Brook is right, what about the Seamaster?
|
28 September 2015, 04:58 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 313
|
Tudor certainly looks nice, never seen one in person. I have that model Breitling although with a white face, mesh bracelet and have been very pleased with it. Very robust, keeps excellent time, looks good. Rotation is bigger since I got it so it doesn't get as much wrist time as it used too. Admittedly, I don't know much about Tudor so can't comment directly but suspect either would be good choices depending on what you want. Just wanted to chime in that Brietling shouldn't be discounted as far as quality goes.
|
28 September 2015, 05:25 AM | #38 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Rolex 14060M
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
Are you implying that in house is better than ETA? If so, how? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
28 September 2015, 05:35 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 5,061
|
I went to an AD and decided in advance if they had a Pelagos and I liked it I'd buy it. They had one, I didn't buy it. Very rough crown, felt poorly made. Of the two I'd go for the Brightling, it's a more proven movement than the new Tudor in house. Like someone said before, most of what Brightling makes is too gawdy for me but the one in the picture here looks very nice.
|
28 September 2015, 05:58 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Jay
Location: Classified
Watch: Addict
Posts: 1,122
|
Of these two..the Tudor
|
28 September 2015, 08:21 AM | #41 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
|
28 September 2015, 11:08 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: greg martyn
Location: ukiah
Watch: tudor pelagos
Posts: 1
|
tudor for sure
|
28 September 2015, 11:44 AM | #43 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
Both nice of course... I've seen the Pelagos in the flesh and compared it to my bluesy 116613b... No chance !!!! Nice watch but it's a wanna be sub IMHO!!!
The breitling with the mesh bracelet is stunning and has a look of its own !!! Sporty but elegant at the same time ... I'd go for the Breitling , lots of history there as well! |
28 September 2015, 11:47 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Sandro
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex/GS
Posts: 4,412
|
Tudor
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
28 September 2015, 11:51 AM | #45 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hollywood 1950
Posts: 4,103
|
Tudor!!
|
28 September 2015, 11:59 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Syed
Location: The Ether
Posts: 3,388
|
My gut says Tudor but of all the modern Tudors I've handled, the finishing and overall quality has been disappointing for the price point.
They just don't look or feel like multi thousand dollars watches. In house movements help, but that just started. Also not a fan of the Rolex tradition of putting stupid amounts of text on the dial. Seven lines of text? Really? The breitling isn't much better off. There is so much nonsense written on both of those dials. That being said, if I had to choose between those two, I would probably still go Tudor.
__________________
Rolex Datejust 41 126334 | Omega Speedmaster Professional Hesalite | Cartier Santos Large | Tudor Black Bay 58 |
28 September 2015, 12:02 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
A contender for blue consideration
__________________
|
28 September 2015, 12:18 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Georgia
Posts: 118
|
Compare closely and the Breitling will be an easy choice. Available in 42 or 46mm the fit, finish, COSC and overall aesthetics are head and shoulders above the Tudor. Adding the mesh bracelet takes it to an entirely different level on par with or above Rolex.
But the Breitlings don't hold their value as the fan club is smaller, although the new Tudors aren't really any better in terms of depreciation. You won't see 4 of the same watch on every plane you board and there are good deals to be had on slightly used ones. SOH all the way for me. |
28 September 2015, 12:24 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
|
Tudor for me
|
28 September 2015, 01:04 PM | #50 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 279
|
Quote:
don't get me wrong, theres nothing wrong with ETA. i have the original ETA pelagos myself. but strictly speaking which is better between the superocean heritage and the pelagos; the pelagos is much better and the movement is just one of the few reasons. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.