ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 October 2015, 03:19 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Elliott
Location: Prosper, Texas
Watch: Sub 114060 2019
Posts: 410
|
Is the SS SubC
Hello all, I've been on TRF for a while. I was looking at the current buyers and sellers markets on our website classified section, as well as Rolex General Discussion. Is it me, or are others seeing a trend where the 114060 seems more liked than our beloved 116610? With the new band, solid case, and ceramic bezel, the 114060 seems more liked, and less buyers remorse having purchased a no date SubC. I think the 114060 will soon be on top of the Sub Date. I mean, we all carry cell phones that have the date anyways. I don't know..... So thoughts Please?
|
9 October 2015, 03:21 PM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
|
Yes, there is no debate, the 114060 is the best Sub.
that is, unless they have a 116610, then that is the best sub (date) |
9 October 2015, 03:26 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: On the beach
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
And, we already have phones which tell the time as well, so I'm not sure the argument against the date function holds water. |
|
9 October 2015, 08:22 PM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Carlos.
Location: NNJ - MDE
Watch: = Want them all.
Posts: 3,697
|
I personally do not care for the date but I am in love with the Cyclops. And since you can't just slap a cyclop on the face to magnify an hour marker... Easy.
|
9 October 2015, 11:47 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
People like it coz it's cheaper, no one's got any cash round here
Seriously tho both watches are iconic in their own ways now and both have lots of fans. |
9 October 2015, 11:52 PM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
|
No proclamation or personal "feeling" makes it so. Even if what you've noticed on this site was true, it's an exceedingly small sample size with the added ambiguity of possibly being a temporary trend. So without hard numbers I would say your theory is a little damp.
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal... on a fairly irrelevant social media site that falsely inflates my fragile ego" |
9 October 2015, 11:59 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
It's probably about half and half, give or take, on this forum. Which, as Marc said, is a very small percentage of the entire Rolex wearing population. So exactly what that means is...
they're both great watches with strong fan bases? |
10 October 2015, 12:12 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Elliott
Location: Prosper, Texas
Watch: Sub 114060 2019
Posts: 410
|
Good points by all. I will agree with some, with the exception of being cheaper and were broke which is why we didn't select the date feature. I don't think a person smacking down 8 stacks for a watch is broke in the least, and could surely find an additional 1,000 for the date feature if need be..
|
10 October 2015, 12:12 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
|
Here in Bangkok I can get a discount on a SubC but they won't budge on a SubC Date. They tell me that most Thai's are not interested in the SubC because the Date is seen as being better because it's got an extra complication and is more expensive. That's what they told me. Having an LVc I would definitely get the SubC if I was buying a black sub. I love the symmetry of the dial and all my other watches have dates if I should need that on a particular day
__________________
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum |
10 October 2015, 12:20 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 5,061
|
It's a good UTR rolex without the Cyclops. Before I became more educated in here about Rolex I didn't realize one was manufactured without a date. I guess I didn't pay enough attention to the Rolex Website...
If I bought a Sub I'd probably opt for the no date version. |
10 October 2015, 12:21 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PG.PJ.SH
Watch: Crown.Rose.Shield
Posts: 173
|
In Asia, most people identify Rolex with cyclops. So any Rolex with cyclops will not have discount. For me I would prefer the 114060 for Sub. I love the symmetry. If I want a cyclops, I would get either a GMT Master II or Exp II.
|
10 October 2015, 12:27 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,417
|
I have a 14060 and a 114060 so I am a little biased when it comes to not having a date function! ;)
|
10 October 2015, 12:54 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,224
|
I think the 114060 is so beloved (full disclaimer: I am a former owner) is because it is closer to the original Submariner which lacked a date. It is therefore more classic. There is also something unique about the 114060 in that it only comes in steel and with the classic black bezel. You can make the argument that it is more of a tool watch than the date models as the date option is considered an additional luxury not required for a dive watch. Then again, the watch has a ceramic bezel so to be fair, it's a luxury watch itself.
|
10 October 2015, 12:57 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
Quote:
|
|
10 October 2015, 01:04 AM | #15 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
|
Quote:
__________________
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum |
|
10 October 2015, 01:06 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
|
Both great, that's why they offer two!
|
10 October 2015, 01:49 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,652
|
I think they both have a lot of fans and are iconic in their own right. I own a 114060 and bought it after intending to buy a date version. Just fell in love with the symmetrical dial. I think the SubC is appreciated by WIS at a higher % than the general population because most WIS are not concerned with the watch being so recognizable and focus on the asthetics, history etc. To the general public a sub with a Cyclops is instantly recognizable. My subC usually flies under the radar, but when people have noticed the watch i have had several say "beautiful watch" and then if they look closely seem say "oh it's a Rolex" with some surprise. Ok by me.
|
10 October 2015, 02:06 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Sub
Posts: 862
|
I love both 114060 and 116610!! One has great symmetry, and other one has date function.
I already have a 14060 2-Liner ( IMO is the cleanest dial ) , so if I do get the Sub Ceramic, it would be a 116610! |
10 October 2015, 02:14 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 893
|
|
10 October 2015, 02:17 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: GMT Master 16750
Posts: 795
|
Love my 114060. I already had a 16610 LV so I wanted a no date for the clean/ classic look.
|
10 October 2015, 02:26 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,224
|
Quote:
If I was starting over and I was only going to own one dive watch from Rolex, the 114060 is the piece I would get. If I had to consider a model with a date, I'd go with the Sea Dweller. |
|
10 October 2015, 02:43 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Personal preference.
If I had to guess, I would say the Sub Date sells in higher numbers.
__________________
|
10 October 2015, 03:17 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,335
|
For me I own other Rolexes with dates, so it had to be the 114060, and no remorse.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.