The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 December 2015, 12:50 PM   #1
F5guy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 5
Newbie with Sub ND vs. Tudor ?'s

so I'm ready to take the plunge and deciding between a Sub ND and either a Tudor BB or Pelagos. First question is did they make the ND in blue and what are your opinions. I really like the blue face and dial but my buddy says Tudor will never hold its value the same way. Thanks for your opinions
F5guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 12:57 PM   #2
jmiicustomz
"TRF" Member
 
jmiicustomz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: John
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 1953 pre explorer
Posts: 2,758
No blue no date sub in rolex that I know of and I would look for a vintage tudor blue sub or snowflake and you will have something that holds its value or appreciates rather than something built to cater to the "close enough" market and is more trendy than timeless. I am no expert by any means and that is just mho.

Enjoy it either way you go and have fun
jmiicustomz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 12:58 PM   #3
Flstfirider
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Flstfirider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Auburn, AL
Watch: Rolex, Tudor
Posts: 1,139
Dollar for dollar the new Peleagos with the in house movement is a better value and in my opinion a better watch. I know that many will discount the Pelagos for the simple fact that it does not have "Rolex" on the dial. Having owned many Rolex watches, and other prominent brands, the Pelagos is deserving of the same respect as its sister brand, Rolex.

Flstfirider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 12:59 PM   #4
cdmorenot
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
cdmorenot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Carlos.
Location: NNJ - MDE
Watch: = Want them all.
Posts: 3,700
I do not own a no date but I do own a date sub C. I also own a Tudor black bay blue...

Quite frankly they are both incredible pieces and when I was just getting started I worried about pieces holding their value. That isn't the case anymore. I simply do not care and buy what I like regardless of price and value. With that out of the way, you cannot choose a Black Bay over a no date Sub. They are simply two very different watches on very uneven playing fields. If you are going to go with just one watch, get the Sub. If you plan on eventually getting both, get the one that will fit your budget at this very moment more comfortably. Remember that if you get both, slightly used, from a trusted seller you'll be close to retail on a new sub.
cdmorenot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 01:00 PM   #5
melrob1
"TRF" Member
 
melrob1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Colorado
Posts: 968
I've owned them all. It's not even fair to compare. ND in a class all by itself. Versatile for all occasions and simply stunning!
melrob1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 01:20 PM   #6
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
1st go for the Rolex Nd,2nd watch go for the Tudor
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 01:21 PM   #7
CWIN
"TRF" Member
 
CWIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
Both great watches and there is a lot of value with either the Black Bay or Pelagos. But a Rolex is a Rolex and the Sub would be my choice.
__________________
Instagram @cwin
CWIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 01:25 PM   #8
Daryl
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Daryl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 3,365
i like my tudor BBN more than subc date. i don't own a ND sub
Daryl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 01:29 PM   #9
westsideclock
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 252
Go for the Sub. It will make you smile every time you look at the no date dial!
westsideclock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 01:42 PM   #10
Norms
"TRF" Member
 
Norms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 279
just bought a no date. i have both the BB and the pelagos. i would say its easily worth the price gap. the fit and finish is out of this world. however, if budget wise you're spending something you're not very comfortable with on the rolex then go tudor. the pelagos is easily the best in its price range. full titanium case with in-house movement (ETA has its perks too), ceramic bezel, extra rubber strap, etc. not much else can compete at that level. the BB is pretty sweet, but if you're looking at pure value the pelagos would be much more worth it. the beauty of the BB is in the design not really the function or technology.
__________________
Rolex GMT master II ceramic, Rolex Datejust, Rolex Datejust II, Rolex Milgauss GV ZBlue, Tudor Black Bay, Tudor Hydronaut I, Tudor Pelagos, Omega Speedmaster Pro
Norms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 01:42 PM   #11
ilovewatchestoo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Eric
Location: California
Watch: 114060
Posts: 425
Sub no question. Really though you should try both on and see which sings to you the most. Ultimately either will be great choices but I have to say the Sub, especially since I purchased it a few days ago as my first ever high quality timepiece and it's amazing
ilovewatchestoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 01:44 PM   #12
ilovewatchestoo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Eric
Location: California
Watch: 114060
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norms View Post
just bought a no date. i have both the BB and the pelagos. i would say its easily worth the price gap. the fit and finish is out of this world. however, if budget wise you're spending something you're not very comfortable with on the rolex then go tudor. the pelagos is easily the best in its price range. full titanium case with in-house movement (ETA has its perks too), ceramic bezel, extra rubber strap, etc. not much else can compete at that level. the BB is pretty sweet, but if you're looking at pure value the pelagos would be much more worth it. the beauty of the BB is in the design not really the function or technology.
Great insight
ilovewatchestoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 01:47 PM   #13
busytimmy
"TRF" Member
 
busytimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 3,745
I would buy a 114060 and a Pelagos blue and enjoy the best of both worlds.
busytimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 01:58 PM   #14
rebel_1
"TRF" Member
 
rebel_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by F5guy View Post
so I'm ready to take the plunge and deciding between a Sub ND and either a Tudor BB or Pelagos. First question is did they make the ND in blue and what are your opinions. I really like the blue face and dial but my buddy says Tudor will never hold its value the same way. Thanks for your opinions
I can assure you that you will almost always lose your a$$ when flipping a watch you buy new. That being said, I was in the same situation last summer. I ended up getting the SubC no date and haven't been happier. As others have said, there really is no comparison between the Tudors and Rolexes. But Rolex doesn't make a TI watch, so for that, you'd need to get the Tudor.
rebel_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 02:04 PM   #15
NeoAnderson
"TRF" Member
 
NeoAnderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: NeoAnderson
Location: Tax Free Shopping
Posts: 725
Get a SD4k
NeoAnderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 02:21 PM   #16
arguetaoscar
"TRF" Member
 
arguetaoscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,335
In my opinion all 3 watches are great, I own a BB and a 114060 and love them both, thinking of getting a Pelagos blue as well. Follow your gut... and keep us posted!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
arguetaoscar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 03:13 PM   #17
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
For the amount I had invested in my 114060 I got rid of it because I couldn't get use to the weight and feel on my wrist. I feel the BBR is much more comfortable to me with 6.5 in wrists. I've got watches that feel similar to the 114060 on my wrist but they are far less expensive than the SubC. I decided that wearing my 14060 T<25 Sub met my needs. Actually for what I had paid for the SubC I own both the 14060 and the BBR and have both itches scratched. BTW, OP, welcome to the forum; enjoy.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 03:19 PM   #18
Norms
"TRF" Member
 
Norms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 279
Quote:
Originally Posted by busytimmy View Post
I would buy a 114060 and a Pelagos blue and enjoy the best of both worlds.

Good advice. Dressy everyday diver in the 114060. Fun sports watch in the blue peli.
__________________
Rolex GMT master II ceramic, Rolex Datejust, Rolex Datejust II, Rolex Milgauss GV ZBlue, Tudor Black Bay, Tudor Hydronaut I, Tudor Pelagos, Omega Speedmaster Pro
Norms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 04:02 PM   #19
eco8gator
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Florida
Watch: 5060/a
Posts: 1,119
Vintage Tudor's have done really well.

I would go for a Tudor 79190 in blue if you can find one.

http://www.dtwatches.com/tudor79190bluestock2191.htm

Here is an example of what one looks like I think its beautiful. I personally have a 79090 in blue love it.

And other good blue choices are a Blue Black Bay or a Blue Pelagos. If your worried about resale buy it preowned...

BTW, there were a couple blue 1680 submariner made in the 70's. Aparently they are very very rare.

http://the-lume.com/2014/06/22/rarest-rolexes-part-1/
eco8gator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 04:06 PM   #20
Lordofrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Lordofrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwin View Post
both great watches and there is a lot of value with either the black bay or pelagos. But a rolex is a rolex and the sub would be my choice.
x2
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN
Panerai PAM 359
Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR


Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich
Lordofrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 05:43 PM   #21
igwt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: alabang
Posts: 211
if you don't plan to sell... doesn't matter if it will hold its value or not... that being said... buy the one u like.. I've own a lot of rolex.. from Lvc to SDc... flipped them all... and super enjoy my Black bay red...
igwt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 06:03 PM   #22
brettpaul
"TRF" Member
 
brettpaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: Bahrain, Dubai
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 5,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by CWIN View Post
Both great watches and there is a lot of value with either the Black Bay or Pelagos. But a Rolex is a Rolex and the Sub would be my choice.
x2 here!

The Pelagos is a great watch, but the ND Sub is a modern classic and I'd be more inclined to get it first. The Glidelock is an amazing feature and with the ceramic bezel and supercase it's the hands-down winner!
__________________
Photostream on Instagram brett_in_bahrain
brettpaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 09:49 PM   #23
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,500
I'd go with the Sub first.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 09:55 PM   #24
Racerdj
2024 Pledge Member
 
Racerdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
If you can swing the Rolex, you will be better off and maybe not regret it.
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe
Racerdj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 09:55 PM   #25
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,801
I own a Sub-C ND, a Pelagos Blue and a BBB. All are great watches but the Sub is the base of my collection and my favorite all time watch. If you can do it go Sub-C ND first. This may help with buying another but for me it did not.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 10:03 PM   #26
Spoonage
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,133
I have the SubC, Tudor Sub 79090, and the BBN. Purchased in that order all within 2 months. Of the three the BBN gets the most wrist time followed by the Tudor Sub. Love all 3 though. The other question is how would you feel if it gets scratched and how do you treat your watches. Do you wear and use them as intended or baby them? I wear all my watches everywhere. Camping, work, beach, sleep, etc. (except to the gym). Everyone of my watches has a scratch here and there, not horribly but I'm not upset about the scratches either. That may be another deciding factor to you.
Spoonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 10:07 PM   #27
Abdullasaif
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Dubai
Watch: bipolar
Posts: 2,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeoAnderson View Post
Get a SD4k
Yes! but depends about the budget prefer the ND sub
Abdullasaif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 10:15 PM   #28
soho
2024 Pledge Member
 
soho's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: Varies
Posts: 2,058
All three are great choices. I personally like the combination of a Rolex GMT and one of the Tudor divers.
soho is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 10:41 PM   #29
Rebel
"TRF" Member
 
Rebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,257
Both are great watches. I would go Tudor.
__________________
-------------------------------
Member of the Nylon Nation
Rebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2015, 11:00 PM   #30
MCO1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Missouri USA
Watch: Daytona C white
Posts: 2,248
Go with the Sub ND first and let the new wear off....then evaluate rather the Tudor is still calling you.
MCO1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.