No love for AP Royal Oak Chrono 26320? Owners PLS show photos here :D

[illition]

Originally Posted by JizJizJiz

Here are some wrist shots on a 6.75" wrist - hope they help!

26320:





26300:



16523:



116520 (modified with meteorite dial and hands):



216570:



16570:



3717:

Thanks!! Just what I needed ;)

Looks to fit kinda similar to a 3717! That blue dial 26300 (i think?) looks great and i'm glad to see you wear and use your watches as they should be used ;)

Looks like the 26320 or 26300 can be quite a rough beater and take a beating as well!

Do you think it fits kind of like a 3717?

[Racerdj]

Stunning!

Originally Posted by AK797

Steve makes many great points. I will add that I have the 26320 ROC and it wears larger at around 42/3mm, so not that dissimilar to the 42mm chrono ROOs as they have smaller dials, but at 11mm thick it is a fair bit slimmer and therefore more dressy and cuff friendly. The F. Piguet movement is very solid and I have had no issues with mine and not many reported here either I remember. My wrist is down to 7 inches from 7.25 and I find the ROOs a little too big and thick now. Even the ROC's lugs are right on the edge of going over my wrist.

[AK797]

Originally Posted by Racerdj

Stunning!

[cceenn]

On my 6.5' wrist. Definitely a keeper over roo.

[cceenn]

Don't know how to post multiple photos but in contrast that's how the rooc would look like, which is nice only on casual wear but the roc is fine with any occasion... Hope this helps : )

[Abdullasaif]

Wow some really great points brought up in this thread better save it in case anyone needs it later

[KBM]

Like I just said on another thread, I think the ROC is a perfect mix of AP DNA and a sporty look. The black dial ROC is likely to be my first AP.