ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 January 2016, 05:26 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 243
|
Is this ruined to you?
I'm probably not the only one that thinks this watch is now ruined but who would actually wear this? For me diamonds on a watch even for markers is a stretch.
|
7 January 2016, 05:28 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
I like that stealthy look
|
7 January 2016, 05:29 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 243
|
|
7 January 2016, 05:34 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 279
|
would you like some watch with your diamonds?
__________________
Rolex GMT master II ceramic, Rolex Datejust, Rolex Datejust II, Rolex Milgauss GV ZBlue, Tudor Black Bay, Tudor Hydronaut I, Tudor Pelagos, Omega Speedmaster Pro |
7 January 2016, 05:39 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Novi MI
Posts: 232
|
Gross.
|
7 January 2016, 05:45 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 839
|
Nope not ruined... PIMPED!
|
7 January 2016, 05:53 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: UK
Watch: ing you watch me
Posts: 636
|
I prefer something a bit more flashy
|
7 January 2016, 05:56 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 671
|
She's a bute Clark!
__________________
- "M" 16600 Sea-Dweller - "A" GMT 16700. -“A” 16613LB Sub - 1680 Red Sub, Mark II, "Full Set" - 116660 DSSD D-Blue, 124060, 126613LN, 116710BLNR - 116500LN White Dial - “U” 16610 “SWISS” dial |
7 January 2016, 06:04 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Rolex & Omega
Posts: 6,668
|
For the man who has everything!
|
7 January 2016, 06:09 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: HCM, Viet Nam
Watch: 16600N, 1625
Posts: 61
|
Ruined
|
7 January 2016, 06:09 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
|
Not something that would interest me. I really prefer factory.
|
7 January 2016, 06:11 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: England
Watch: Exp 2 polar white
Posts: 1,147
|
Dial is to plain for that watch
|
7 January 2016, 06:15 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ben
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 306
|
Urg!! Can't stand it! But I believe some people can pull it off tho
|
7 January 2016, 06:20 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: HK & USA
Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV
Posts: 2,001
|
No it's not ruined, it's a statement watch to be worn on special occasions like when you host a party at your palace for those with fewer oil wells than you, or de-planing from your private 747 and there's a line of people waiting there hoping to be acknowledged before you hop into your helicopter. In that context, you're going to look like a big phoney if you go plain vanilla.
|
7 January 2016, 06:33 PM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
|
I wouldn't wear it. I think it has been ruined, yes!
__________________
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum |
7 January 2016, 07:12 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Disco Volante
Posts: 350
|
But lets make this topic interesting fellas. How could you salvage this?
Could you remove the diamonds and sell them wholesale, if yes, for how much? Source new bracelet links? How much would this fetch realistically on resale? Is a trade in at 50% market value to the dealer is most valuable option, if you were gifted one and couldn't wear it?
__________________
Rolex Submariner Reference 114060 |
7 January 2016, 07:23 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: London
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 482
|
|
7 January 2016, 07:58 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Watch: 114060 / 114300
Posts: 325
|
Under the radar fore sure
|
7 January 2016, 08:10 PM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Manila, PH
Posts: 36
|
Not my cup of tea. But I know some boxers and rappers love diamonds on their watches.
|
7 January 2016, 08:32 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,796
|
Actually it's the perfect solution for those who worry over scratches to the bezel or bracelet.
Problem solved. |
7 January 2016, 08:35 PM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Location: uk
Posts: 487
|
Tool watch
|
7 January 2016, 08:37 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Hendricks
Location: USA
Watch: 116600
Posts: 826
|
Ugly !! Don't know what else to say
|
7 January 2016, 08:37 PM | #23 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
|
Ouch
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
7 January 2016, 08:39 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Chris!
Location: Corbridge England
Posts: 7
|
"Of course I can, Cheshire is right up that road there sir!"
|
7 January 2016, 08:41 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
Cannot be unseen
|
7 January 2016, 09:39 PM | #26 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: EUR
Posts: 487
|
Quote:
Salvage-wise, I wouldn't be surprised if it cost about as much as a new watch to restore it to original condition. The case, bezel and entire bracelet would all need replacement, as the ones on the watch are ruined and would only be worth their gold scrap value; the diamond chips are essentially worthless. The larger diamonds woudn't be worth much, either. There's not much of a secondary market for them, so their resale value tends to be pitiful. It looks like only the movement, crystal, dial, hands, crown and (I would hope) caseback would be reuseable, and I'm not sure their value would make the project viable given the cost of replacing the rest. I'd say it's essentially a writeoff, at least as a Rolex wristwatch. I'm not an expert in this type of thing, however. It would be interesting to hear from someone who knows the trade better. Further reading for those who are interested: Priceonomics — Diamonds are BS |
|
7 January 2016, 09:51 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: ali
Location: istanbul
Watch: 116500
Posts: 674
|
for my eyes this is UGLY
|
7 January 2016, 09:53 PM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
|
This is an easy one to skip for the collection.
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe |
7 January 2016, 09:54 PM | #29 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
Is there a watch there?
|
7 January 2016, 09:55 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 5,061
|
Tool watch becomes a tools watch.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.