ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mfer · 7 January 2016, 01:13 PM

Why I never noticed.....

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...light=relative

Old Expat Beast · 7 January 2016, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfer

Why I never noticed.....

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...light=relative

Flavio already linked your thread in Post #50

Singslinger · 7 January 2016, 01:31 PM

Size isn't everything.

SemperFi · 7 January 2016, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Singslinger

Size isn't everything.

mfer · 7 January 2016, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast

Flavio already linked your thread in Post #50

Dammit! One of my own pet peeves. People who post and don't read the entire thread!

eonflux · 7 January 2016, 02:38 PM

I much prefer that the minute hand touches the minute markers
It's unfortunate that don't on many Rolex models, with some much worse than others
I think the 39mm Explorer dial looks out of balance, with the hands overwhelmed by the dial and dial markings

DCheeta · 7 January 2016, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FTX I

Wow, that was fast.

Awesome thread. I like this part: "So, not conclusive, but it looks like Rolex made the 214270 second hand longer, but not the other hands."

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=394801

So, after reading Mik's thread again I realize that we are all wrong. The minute hand isn't too short, the dial is too big!

FTX I · 7 January 2016, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCheeta

So, after reading Mik's thread again I realize that we are all wrong. The minute hand isn't too short, the dial is too big!

Apparently so.

LuminousMaximus · 7 January 2016, 10:22 PM

You know what they say about short watch hands...

JJG · 7 January 2016, 11:27 PM

Has anybody (such as Jocke) taken the hands of a 42mm black dial Expii and actually mounted them in a 39mm Exp as in this photoshop? I would love to see the result in real life photos.

I own the 36mm and 39mm Exp. Yes the look of the smallish hands against the larger dial of the 39 annoys me, but not enough to dispose of it.

Dubarzy · 7 January 2016, 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJG

Has anybody (such as Jocke) taken the hands of a 42mm black dial Expii and actually mounted them in a 39mm Exp as in this photoshop? I would love to see the result in real life photos.

I own the 36mm and 39mm Exp. Yes the look of the smallish hands against the larger dial of the 39 annoys me, but not enough to dispose of it.

Eh...not crazy about that at all.

Arclight · 8 January 2016, 12:01 AM

Enjoy the watch! You'll happy to know that the short hands were installed to save weight in high altitude mountaineering expeditions!

bbressler · 8 January 2016, 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arclight

Enjoy the watch! You'll happy to know that the short hands were installed to save weight in high altitude mountaineering expeditions!

Matt748 · 8 January 2016, 05:02 AM

Having owned both the 39mm and 36mm it isthe 36mm that I have always preferred.
It's more legible in any conditions and apart from the Bracelet which is superior on the 39mm the 36mm is my daily wearer and I have no regrets.

Justinmg · 8 January 2016, 05:10 AM

Not a fan of the fatter hands on the 39mm (in the photo shopped photo) but at least there the proper length. Is it really debatable if the hands are short or not?

kilyung · 8 January 2016, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJG

Has anybody (such as Jocke) taken the hands of a 42mm black dial Expii and actually mounted them in a 39mm Exp as in this photoshop? I would love to see the result in real life photos.

I own the 36mm and 39mm Exp. Yes the look of the smallish hands against the larger dial of the 39 annoys me, but not enough to dispose of it.

I like that! Gives the 39mm a more rugged look.

tomchicago · 8 January 2016, 03:41 PM

I've had this watch for 3 years. I read all the stuff about short hands too and saw the pictures. But, when I put the watch on my wrist, it all worked. The lume on the minute hand precisely lines up with the edge of the hour marker lume. The hands were not an afterthought by Rolex, but instead a well thought out design element. Now, when I see the Explorer I with the long minute hand, I think it looks a bit clumsy. The watch is supremely elegant yet sporty and rugged at once. It doesn't look absurd with a suit like many other sport Rollies do (yeah, they do-- you look like you're playing James Bond, but you ain't James Bond...), yet holds its own in any sport setting. You can study all the pictures, read all the writeups, but there's no substitute for wearing it on your wrist. If it works, it works, if not, let it go and move on.

IT Nerd · 8 January 2016, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

I like that! Gives the 39mm a more rugged look.

Yeah that's a cool look!

Cru Jones · 8 January 2016, 03:54 PM

Yup, hands are too short and shame about the switch to the polished 3/6/9, but who cares what a bunch of strangers on a forum think if you love the watch?

Then again, one's feelings for a watch can change, no big deal.

Lol-x · 8 January 2016, 03:58 PM

I think the hands are too small, but it doesn't worry me at all, because I have the choice to buy or not buy.

On the other hand, those who have purchased this watch, more power to you, enjoy

Abdullah71601 · 9 January 2016, 12:29 AM

Well said

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomchicago

I've had this watch for 3 years. I read all the stuff about short hands too and saw the pictures. But, when I put the watch on my wrist, it all worked. The lume on the minute hand precisely lines up with the edge of the hour marker lume. The hands were not an afterthought by Rolex, but instead a well thought out design element. Now, when I see the Explorer I with the long minute hand, I think it looks a bit clumsy. The watch is supremely elegant yet sporty and rugged at once. It doesn't look absurd with a suit like many other sport Rollies do (yeah, they do-- you look like you're playing James Bond, but you ain't James Bond...), yet holds its own in any sport setting. You can study all the pictures, read all the writeups, but there's no substitute for wearing it on your wrist. If it works, it works, if not, let it go and move on.

lamadoo · 9 January 2016, 12:35 AM

Hi guys thanks for ur opinion. In real life its actually is fine! also you guys can fit an aftermarket hand if your daring enough http://www.ewatchparts.com/watch-han...400-swiss.html

That one should fit okay. The Milguass actually has short hands too but at 40mm casing. May as well add the lighting bolt too...3131 and 3132 are pretty much the same movement. I take no responsibilities.......

lamadoo · 9 January 2016, 12:39 AM

Hi guys thanks very much for your opinions. Yes they are short however in real life they are fine

Also here is an idea...place some longer aftermarket Mercedes hands on your explorer 39mm if it stops you from buying it. These mercedes hands should fit the explorer alright. The original Milguass hand does not reach the increment markers (not as bad) but is larger at 40mm so theoretically it should be fine http://www.ewatchparts.com/watch-han...400-swiss.html

The 3131 and 3132 are like the same movement right?

P.S May as well use the lighting bolt hand as well to spice things up...I take no responsibilities in this message.....

7 January 2016, 01:13 PM	#61
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	Why I never noticed..... http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...light=relative __________________ member#3242

7 January 2016, 10:22 PM	#69
LuminousMaximus 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: USA Watch: me hit Huge Lotto Posts: 6,512	You know what they say about short watch hands... __________________ “Every man Dies... Not Every Man, Really Lives.” – William Wallace - To really lives means to live your life to the fullest. It means to chase your dreams, take risks, and to love life. Since everyone’s fate is the same, why not live the best life that you possibly can? In order to really live,you must seize the day. Live each day as if it's your last and overall just do it! Today is a gift, that’s why it’s called the present...

8 January 2016, 03:58 PM	#80
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,588	I think the hands are too small, but it doesn't worry me at all, because I have the choice to buy or not buy. On the other hand, those who have purchased this watch, more power to you, enjoy __________________ *Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.* ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim

7 January 2016, 01:31 PM	#63
Singslinger "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: singapore Posts: 6,424	Size isn't everything.

7 January 2016, 02:38 PM	#66
eonflux "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: SNA Posts: 3,637	I much prefer that the minute hand touches the minute markers It's unfortunate that don't on many Rolex models, with some much worse than others I think the 39mm Explorer dial looks out of balance, with the hands overwhelmed by the dial and dial markings

7 January 2016, 11:27 PM	#70
JJG "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Michigan Posts: 163	Has anybody (such as Jocke) taken the hands of a 42mm black dial Expii and actually mounted them in a 39mm Exp as in this photoshop? I would love to see the result in real life photos. I own the 36mm and 39mm Exp. Yes the look of the smallish hands against the larger dial of the 39 annoys me, but not enough to dispose of it.

8 January 2016, 12:01 AM	#72
Arclight Banned Join Date: Mar 2013 Real Name: Rob Location: New York Watch: Rolex Posts: 577	Enjoy the watch! You'll happy to know that the short hands were installed to save weight in high altitude mountaineering expeditions!

8 January 2016, 05:02 AM	#74
Matt748 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: London - UK Watch: Rolex Posts: 1,249	Having owned both the 39mm and 36mm it isthe 36mm that I have always preferred. It's more legible in any conditions and apart from the Bracelet which is superior on the 39mm the 36mm is my daily wearer and I have no regrets.

8 January 2016, 05:10 AM	#75
Justinmg "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Justin Location: FL Watch: PO/EXPL Posts: 3,371	Not a fan of the fatter hands on the 39mm (in the photo shopped photo) but at least there the proper length. Is it really debatable if the hands are short or not?

8 January 2016, 03:41 PM	#77
tomchicago Banned Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Chicago Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270. Posts: 2,717	I've had this watch for 3 years. I read all the stuff about short hands too and saw the pictures. But, when I put the watch on my wrist, it all worked. The lume on the minute hand precisely lines up with the edge of the hour marker lume. The hands were not an afterthought by Rolex, but instead a well thought out design element. Now, when I see the Explorer I with the long minute hand, I think it looks a bit clumsy. The watch is supremely elegant yet sporty and rugged at once. It doesn't look absurd with a suit like many other sport Rollies do (yeah, they do-- you look like you're playing James Bond, but you ain't James Bond...), yet holds its own in any sport setting. You can study all the pictures, read all the writeups, but there's no substitute for wearing it on your wrist. If it works, it works, if not, let it go and move on.

8 January 2016, 03:54 PM	#79
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,300	Yup, hands are too short and shame about the switch to the polished 3/6/9, but who cares what a bunch of strangers on a forum think if you love the watch? Then again, one's feelings for a watch can change, no big deal.

9 January 2016, 12:35 AM	#82
lamadoo "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: Sydney Posts: 61	Hi guys thanks for ur opinion. In real life its actually is fine! also you guys can fit an aftermarket hand if your daring enough http://www.ewatchparts.com/watch-han...400-swiss.html That one should fit okay. The Milguass actually has short hands too but at 40mm casing. May as well add the lighting bolt too...3131 and 3132 are pretty much the same movement. I take no responsibilities.......

9 January 2016, 12:39 AM	#83
lamadoo "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: Sydney Posts: 61	Hi guys thanks very much for your opinions. Yes they are short however in real life they are fine Also here is an idea...place some longer aftermarket Mercedes hands on your explorer 39mm if it stops you from buying it. These mercedes hands should fit the explorer alright. The original Milguass hand does not reach the increment markers (not as bad) but is larger at 40mm so theoretically it should be fine http://www.ewatchparts.com/watch-han...400-swiss.html The 3131 and 3132 are like the same movement right? P.S May as well use the lighting bolt hand as well to spice things up...I take no responsibilities in this message.....

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)