ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 January 2016, 02:04 AM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
|
|
22 January 2016, 08:23 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 160
|
|
22 January 2016, 08:41 AM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 30
|
From a collection point of view, I really want all original parts that are period correct. Gives me peace of mind that it will hold a stronger future value.
|
22 January 2016, 10:36 AM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
|
It bothers me a lot. That's why I keep spares :)
|
22 January 2016, 06:30 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
Does it bother you if your insert is not period correct?
We r talking vintage right? For me period correct is mandatory, otherwise it would look Franken whether it's all original or not. Not to mention it doesn't look vintage if parts r newer.
I blame it on the autoconnect. |
23 January 2016, 01:09 AM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
Period correct/original for me. Can't stand thin font service inserts with luminova pearls.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.