The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

View Poll Results: Lug hole vs no lug holes
Lug holes 44 40.37%
Non lug holes 43 39.45%
Or I just don't care I got a rolex 22 20.18%
Voters: 109. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 February 2016, 12:40 AM   #1
chino0823
"TRF" Member
 
chino0823's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: ct
Posts: 189
Icon5 Sea dweller

OK yesterday came across a 2006 sea dweller with no lug holes. Which you guys prefer and why, lug holes or no lug holes.

What does either system offer as a benefit?

Which is going to have higher resale value?

Not for investment just which will be sought for more and why?
chino0823 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 12:53 AM   #2
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,181
Hole cases are more vintage, might lead to more resale in the future. On practical terms they are worth the same to me, everything else being the same (overall condition, paperwork, etc.)
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001
Zenith 02.480.405

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 12:55 AM   #3
AF_Rob
"TRF" Member
 
AF_Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,673
I have a Sub with holes and an ExII without. Holes are nice to swap out straps.
AF_Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 01:44 AM   #4
chino0823
"TRF" Member
 
chino0823's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: ct
Posts: 189
Casting votes and information lol
chino0823 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 01:45 AM   #5
LVSubmariner
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 411
Go for the newest one possible
LVSubmariner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 01:51 AM   #6
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
Lug holes...
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 02:12 AM   #7
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
Lug holes

They just make the small task of swapping bracelet or strap so darn easy.
Why any watch does not have them defies my imagination.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 02:17 AM   #8
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Do you like the look?
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 02:55 AM   #9
chino0823
"TRF" Member
 
chino0823's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: ct
Posts: 189
Last bump promise taken polls
chino0823 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 02:57 AM   #10
kirksingleton
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,759
I always like a newer model myself
kirksingleton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 05:43 AM   #11
judodave1964
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sussex
Watch: seadweller 16600
Posts: 175
Lug holes all the way.
Attached Images
 
judodave1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 05:45 AM   #12
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
Lug holes matter only here on TRF, the rest of the world of Rolex owners don't even notice.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 08:37 AM   #13
El Cascarrabias
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: USA
Watch: 16613LB
Posts: 1,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post
Lug holes

They just make the small task of swapping bracelet or strap so darn easy.
Why any watch does not have them defies my imagination.


Yep! Really enjoy my SDc and prefer it over the 5 digit SDs because of the upgrades, but if I had my druthers I'd like it to have lug holes.
El Cascarrabias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 08:38 AM   #14
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post
Lug holes

They just make the small task of swapping bracelet or strap so darn easy.
Why any watch does not have them defies my imagination.
Because rolex makes the best bracelet why swap it
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 08:52 AM   #15
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post
Lug holes

They just make the small task of swapping bracelet or strap so darn easy.
Why any watch does not have them defies my imagination.
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 08:54 AM   #16
Justinmg
"TRF" Member
 
Justinmg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Justin
Location: FL
Watch: PO/EXPL
Posts: 3,371
I love the lug wholes but I wanted a new watch so I got the SDc. But if I had the choice I'd love to have lug wholes on my new one.
Justinmg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 09:16 AM   #17
MickCollins1916
2024 Pledge Member
 
MickCollins1916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Bill
Location: Baltimore, MD
Watch: 116600 SD4K
Posts: 3,283

I have a P-serial 16600, which has lug holes, and a SDc, which obviously doesn't. I only change straps on the 16600, because it's easy. I like having that option, but at the end of the day, rarely exercise it, since the bracelet is so good. 👍


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MickCollins1916 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 09:49 AM   #18
DCheeta
"TRF" Member
 
DCheeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
I would always opt for lug holes given the option, but it's not that important to me. Just makes it so much easier to remove the bracelet for cleaning.
DCheeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 10:40 AM   #19
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
I prefer the no hole smooth case look and my days of changing straps on Rolexes are over.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 February 2016, 03:42 PM   #20
Frosty
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Frosty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: So Cal
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 5,087
Lug holes, matte dial, perfection!
__________________
“Anyone can be sarcastic; it takes intelligence to solve a problem!”
Frosty is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.