ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 February 2016, 05:58 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: New York City
Posts: 110
|
Ap15450st, Patek aquanaut 5167a or black dial Daytona
As a daily wearer... Thoighys, 40th bday coming and wanna treat myself
|
23 February 2016, 06:07 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
It depends on the context, like what watches do you have already?
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
23 February 2016, 06:24 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,536
|
jumbo > 5167 > ss Daytona (id consider used PM Daytona that moves to 1 seed for me)
|
23 February 2016, 06:31 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: New York City
Posts: 110
|
Have nothing at moment, being offered stainless Daytona for 10800... But will ceramic bezel be coming
|
23 February 2016, 06:31 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
It could be a typo, but I can't see a Jumbo there :) 15450ST is the 37mm model, definitely not a Jumbo
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
23 February 2016, 06:37 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: New York City
Posts: 110
|
Agreed
|
23 February 2016, 06:45 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
Yes, sometime in the future. But maybe only for gold Daytona models. I don't think it's worth the wait, it's not that big of a deal.
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
23 February 2016, 06:48 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ruk
Location: .ie
Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P
Posts: 1,232
|
Not easy to say... what do you work as / what are your activities like? Is this your first good watch?
if its for every day, every where - Daytona (hold off till Mid March to see what new ones come out) If its for smart casual AND you already have a Rolex. Then the AP Not a fan of the 5167 |
23 February 2016, 07:02 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: WA
Watch: 5167/15400/Sub/JLC
Posts: 1,023
|
I'd ignore the 37 mm Royal Oak. Even if it's a good fit, the resale market scares me.
Between the other two, I'd go Daytona. Smart, classic, and sporty piece. I love the 5167, but I don't think it works as a solo watch, as I find a steel bracelet more versatile than the rubber. |
23 February 2016, 07:10 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: 'merica
Watch: AP 15400
Posts: 151
|
Have you tried all three on? There's something to be said if one evokes a visceral response when it's on your wrist.
That being said, I like the AP amongst the three (not factoring resale value as it seems it will be a sentimental piece for you). The Daytona is a classic and you can't go wrong with it, but the AP is just more special. Wonderful dilemma to have. Good luck. |
23 February 2016, 07:29 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
If you want a ceramic Dayt I presume you are worried about scratches in which case all 3 are vulnerable, the Aquanaut on rubber the least, so I'd just buy what you love the most.
|
23 February 2016, 08:10 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Roger
Location: ...
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 6,309
|
If it were me -- I would go with the Daytona but would consider a PM one...
If I were going AP - it would be a Jumbo... ...if I were going Patek it would be a blue dial 5711... 40th is the perfect opportunity to splurge for something really special... Just my .02 -- Good luck!!! 👍 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
23 February 2016, 09:06 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
|
Hmm. For a one and only none would be my first choice but all are great regardless.
Among those listed I would have the aquanaut. I would really be in a ceramic Rolex for a one and only though.
__________________
|
23 February 2016, 09:15 AM | #14 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: David Farkas
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 116610, 5712/1A
Posts: 8,182
|
5167 ..... love this watch...... only on rubber though
|
23 February 2016, 09:19 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
Daytona.
|
23 February 2016, 09:30 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,536
|
|
23 February 2016, 10:21 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
|
Due to the size of the AP you chose, I'll say PP, AP, then the Daytona.
|
23 February 2016, 10:35 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Peter
Location: Arcadia, Cali
Watch: 114060 & 116520
Posts: 673
|
Black dial Daytona;)
|
23 February 2016, 10:37 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Taiwan
Watch: 116515LN, 126621
Posts: 180
|
daytona, was never a big fan of the 15450. kind of an odd size. and the aquanaut looks a bit small
|
23 February 2016, 01:20 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 412
|
For a single watch, Daytona would be my choice. Understated, durable, reliable and will do ok w depreciation. Ceramics are nice however a stainless watch will always be a classic...even to the masses. I recently acquired an ap, even though the fit finish and so forth is better on the ap(don't get me wrong I love my ap...different watch) I find that the Daytona can hold its own and I still enjoy wearing it and it is very comfortable. One other point, if you are one of those guys that expects extreme accuracy in a mechanical watch then Rolex is your better bet.
|
23 February 2016, 01:21 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Will
Location: New York
Posts: 500
|
Of the choices and for one and only, I'd go:
5167 >/= Daytona >15450. I have a preference for the 5167 but think the Daytona may make for a better daily watch. If could expand a bit, I'd say: 5711 > 15202 > 5167 etc. The 5711/Jumbo you could definitely use as daily watches provided you don't mind scruffing up the watches somewhat (particularly the polished parts). Do bear in mind Patek service times (roughly 6 months once out of warranty) if you only have one watch. Subs and GMT II's are also fantastic for one and only watches as well... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
23 February 2016, 05:54 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: norcal
Posts: 151
|
I own a 15450st. It's a very under appreciated model. I loved how compact the case is versus the 15400/15300... the movement fits in the 15450 just perfectly, but is stuffed in too large of a case for the 15400 (check out the case backs to see what I mean... much more bezel on the latter).
Resale would be worse on the 15450 but you will definitely find a great deal on one as it's overshadowed by the rest of the line. Also, I believe this ref is discontinued and that there are slim chances of a plain steel <39mm RO ever being made again. The Daytona is great, but you can always pick one up in the future. 5167a is great too but you can save $6000 by choosing a 15450, and you're getting one of the best bracelets in the industry and an equally amazing build quality. Comparison of my pam510, SD4k, 15450: |
23 February 2016, 06:02 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: norcal
Posts: 151
|
Also wanted to note that
1. if you hadn't tried it on yet, the 15450 is an excellent fit for smaller wrists. 2. it has a rep for being a woman's watch, but plenty of guys rock them. This is the Linkedin CEO wearing one: |
23 February 2016, 06:30 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Jeddah, KSA
Posts: 413
|
That's a 15300 he is wearing.
|
24 February 2016, 02:59 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
|
|
24 February 2016, 03:32 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: norcal
Posts: 151
|
You're right. The article I saw it in has since been corrected. Regardless I think the 15450 is still an excellent watch and a killer value! :)
|
24 February 2016, 05:23 AM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: LA
Posts: 393
|
Haven't you already had 2 daytonas in the past, and sold them?
Makes me think there's something you don't like about it, so I would go for either the AP or Patek. I'd hate to buy the Daytona for a third time, and then end up selling it again |
24 February 2016, 05:32 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: New York City
Posts: 110
|
True...
|
24 February 2016, 08:45 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,005
|
Two out of three ain't bad
Actually I have a 15300 with blue dial, and a 5167. If push came to shove I would keep the 15300 but it would be down to multiple reasons.
|
24 February 2016, 10:07 AM | #30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
|
Quote:
AP is my #1 brand, but that damn Paul has me looking hard at RM now |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.