The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 March 2016, 08:29 PM   #31
D111s
"TRF" Member
 
D111s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Hampshire UK
Watch: A few
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
Bubbleback! Not good. The flat back is one of the BB's best features, IMO.
Just what I was thinking...
D111s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 08:29 PM   #32
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luap1976 View Post
Yes 2 mm thicker it's 43mm now
That's width, not thickness.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 08:30 PM   #33
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris975d View Post
Of all the new Tudor releases, I'm kind of digging the updated Tudor Style. Added a fluted bezel and a blue sun-ray dial. I think Tudor now has a decent looking more formal option.




except for that date window being way too far toward the middle, signaling a movement that's way too small for the new, larger case.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 08:30 PM   #34
airchitect
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: KY
Watch: A few.....
Posts: 3,796
The riveted bracelet looks very cheesy to my eye. I'd have to order in leather and swap it for the current gens bracelet.
airchitect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 08:30 PM   #35
D111s
"TRF" Member
 
D111s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Hampshire UK
Watch: A few
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
That's width, not thickness.
And only for the bronze model
D111s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 08:32 PM   #36
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
what now is the difference between the ranger line and the BB36 line?
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 08:33 PM   #37
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
what now is the difference between the ranger line and the BB36 line?
Hands, dial, case size, bracelet.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 08:36 PM   #38
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
Hands, dial, case size, bracelet.


aaah, ok, that is pretty different, then. thanks. i was confusted by the missing bezel on the BB36.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 08:40 PM   #39
RMC12
"TRF" Member
 
RMC12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Jon
Location: UK
Watch: Smurf/Hulk/1680
Posts: 2,920
I like the look of the BB36 although too small for me. My wife would be all over it though!

Love the Bronze too - cant wait to see one in person!!!

Not a big fan of the riveted bracelet on the BBB and not really too fussed about the other new additions.

Just my two penneth!!
RMC12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 08:41 PM   #40
Luap1976
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London Uk
Watch: 116610lnBBetaBBhar
Posts: 1,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
That's width, not thickness.
I know it's 2mm wider and 2mm thicker aswell.I prefer the old blackbay I may be in the majority I think
Luap1976 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 08:42 PM   #41
Gnomon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: 214270
Posts: 256
Some pretty good stuff. Advisor is a bore. Wish they hadn't smoked Clymer/Mayer's private stash and put those fake rivets on the BB bracelet.

+1 for much improved power reserve now that 2824 is history (at least for the BB).
__________________
“Wit, you know, is the unexpected copulation of ideas…” (Samuel Johnson)
Gnomon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 08:56 PM   #42
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnomon View Post
Some pretty good stuff. Advisor is a bore. Wish they hadn't smoked Clymer/Mayer's private stash and put those fake rivets on the BB bracelet.

+1 for much improved power reserve now that 2824 is history.
The Advisor's quarter-hour alarm markers where the minutes should be kill it for me. That would drive me mad, forever squinting at the inner minutes ring, partially obscured by the minute hand.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 09:04 PM   #43
Star Ferry
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,926
I love how the Tudor brand is more communicative than Rolex. For example, they admit that the Advisor was enlarged to fit modern tastes - I like that they are shedding some light on the reasons for the design.
Star Ferry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 09:31 PM   #44
southcarolina1801
"TRF" Member
 
southcarolina1801's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Peach State
Posts: 735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
Just noticed the Black Bay Dark has got the old-style straight endlinks, which is a bit of an odd choice for the most modern looking version.
I just noticed that as well... looks horrible
southcarolina1801 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 09:34 PM   #45
JElvis
"TRF" Member
 
JElvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Elvis
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 323
As one poster above said- absolute amateur hour for Tudor. Rolex shined. Tudor- not so
Much. And I love Tudor. Own a BBB. Love it. But this release was pure amateur hour in design. Upgraded BBB movement nice. IMHO.
JElvis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 10:25 PM   #46
mjrchabot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Toronto, ON
Watch: Rolex 116000, BB36
Posts: 147
I don't see what's amateur about the 36mm Black Bay? I agree, the other BB releases don't do much for me personally; the brown hues of the bronze model looks nice, but they failed by making it 43mm IMO.

However, the 36mm BB is a watch many people have been asking for, albeit most would have preferred to see a 36mm Explorer. We all know that won't happen though because the 3132 won't fit in a 36mm case, so they've have to equip it with a 3130. I think this 36mm BB will sell exceptionally well! There's still a huge audience for a do-all 36mm watch. I kind of like that it has a ETA 2824 only for the sake you can be anywhere in the world with that thing and get it fixed should it breakdown on you.
mjrchabot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2016, 11:02 PM   #47
AndersB
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 603
The 36mm seems perfect to me.
AndersB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2016, 02:02 AM   #48
NKflyer
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Richard
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,858
Some incorrect info being shared here. The stainless Black Bay will remain 41mm width. It's only the bronze that is 43mm.
NKflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2016, 02:26 AM   #49
vitalsignsrn
"TRF" Member
 
vitalsignsrn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Judy
Location: Ontario
Watch: 116234 - 14060M
Posts: 4,607
None of these really grab me. I would have taken a look at the Black Bay 36 if it came in blue. LOL Even the Tudor Style could have been a winner but it's really not that fantastic. Too bad.
vitalsignsrn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2016, 02:29 AM   #50
Boothroyd
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Boothroyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,258
Really sorry to hear that the new movement requires use of a bubble back. I agree with Adam, the flat back of the BB was one of it's key features, for me anyway.
__________________
Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N
Boothroyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2016, 02:32 AM   #51
Estilo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 33
If anyone knows the BB36's lug to lug please do post. Can't find that info anywhere.
Estilo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2016, 06:13 AM   #52
Bobby83
"TRF" Member
 
Bobby83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 271
Any word on the ranger getting the new in house? Was going to buy one sooner than later but now considering waiting to see if it gets the in house...I like the 70 hour reserve and the official cert...but ease of service with ETA is nice...thoughts?
Bobby83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.