ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 March 2016, 01:59 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Josh
Location: Camden SC
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 214
|
already flipping
So I just got my YM blue dial, and although it's beautiful, I'm not satisfied with it. i wear a 42mm Explorer II and a Sub LV mostly, and the YM feels small compared to my other 2 main watches. I've worn it all week and don't think I can get over it. So, I'm looking at either a Sub-C no date or an older GMT coke (no lug holes). Does anybody know if this older style GMT wears small like the YM?
|
20 March 2016, 02:12 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,673
|
Isn't the Sub LV and the YM the same size? I know it's not as chunky, but the numbers are the same, yes?
|
20 March 2016, 02:13 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Josh
Location: Camden SC
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 214
|
they are both 40mm, maybe because the lugs are chunkier on the Sub and also the YM has curved lugs.
|
20 March 2016, 02:15 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
|
I have the blue YM as well. It's a keeper for me. The bezel does make the blue YM wear smaller than the sub, but that's not a bad thing. The YM is possibly the most comfortable watch I own.
|
20 March 2016, 02:20 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,054
|
|
20 March 2016, 02:24 PM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
I never owned either, but I'm almost positive the 5 digit reference GmT will wear more like your YM. Additionally the 6 digit gmt may wear somewhere in between the YM and the LV. The case shape is slightly different, thinner and lighter.
|
20 March 2016, 11:02 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Josh
Location: Camden SC
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 214
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk |
|
21 March 2016, 12:23 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Danny
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 153
|
The YM together with the ExpII and LV sounds like a killer trio! Nice dial variations and the YM is just a great looking watch. I've seen a picture somewhere with a blue dial YM on a great leather strap and that made it look very nice!
I can understand it looks a bit small compared to the ExpII, but maybe if you have it a little longer and wear it for a longer time, it grows on you. You just got it like a week ago right? |
21 March 2016, 12:31 AM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,312
|
I would get a SD4k
|
21 March 2016, 12:36 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Shawn
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: GMT IIc, LVc
Posts: 737
|
I tried on the older GMT and it does wear smaller than the current GMT IIc. The sub c does wear a bit bigger than gmt II c.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
21 March 2016, 12:40 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
I'd give it a bit more time. The Exp2 wears larger than the Subc and you got used to that difference so should be able to on the YM as difference is marginal. GMT will be the same size, GMTc more like the subc.
|
21 March 2016, 01:43 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Josh
Location: Camden SC
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 214
|
Good advise. Maybe I should wear it a bit longer before dumping it. What's funny is I wore a 36mm DJ for 16 years before jumping to the Explorer II.
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.