ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

RG1825 · 27 April 2016, 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watchwatcher

Sounds like the 214270 would def be worth a try for you...I'm pretty keen on checking the new Basel version out myself when it's available. From a fellow small wristed TRF member.

Yeah I'm keen on the new one too but waiting until August/September or longer would kind of defy the point of congratulating myself on the new job/graduation in May ;( the lume is bloody fantastic though - good luck resisting the purchase!

WWC · 27 April 2016, 08:59 AM

I own both and would say the explore is definitely more comfortable of the two.

Bfd70 · 27 April 2016, 11:11 AM

214270
116610
<7" wrists
214270 definitely wears smaller. I suspect it is due to the clasp size.

tomchicago · 28 April 2016, 05:24 AM

214270 or 114270. The extra large sub crown always bothered my wrist. 214270 is supremely comfortable. You'll forget it's even on wrist.

Finslayer83 · 2 October 2019, 01:38 PM

214270 smokes it.

Much better than the. 114060 I had - the Explorer is the only 6 digit I like, prefer 5 digit Sub/GMT

CasinoRoyale_007 · 2 October 2019, 04:11 PM

How about a 116000 Blue 3 6 9? You can even substitute in explorer hands to make it effectively a blue 36mm explorer with updated bracelet :)

27 April 2016, 08:59 AM	#2
WWC "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Home Posts: 1,438	I own both and would say the explore is definitely more comfortable of the two. __________________ Royal Oak 15500ST Master Calendar METEORITE Q1552540 \| Luminor GMT PAM 00335 Aquanaut 5167A-001 \| Nautilus 5712/1A-001 Cosmograph DAYTONA 116520 \| DEEPSEA 126660 \| Explorer 214270 \| GMT Master II BLRO 16710 \| GMT Master II VTNR 126720 \| Submariner LV 16610 \| Sky-Dweller 326139 \| Prince Oysterdate 90630

27 April 2016, 11:11 AM	#3
Bfd70 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Chicago Posts: 893	214270 116610 <7" wrists 214270 definitely wears smaller. I suspect it is due to the clasp size.

28 April 2016, 05:24 AM	#4
tomchicago Banned Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Chicago Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270. Posts: 2,717	214270 or 114270. The extra large sub crown always bothered my wrist. 214270 is supremely comfortable. You'll forget it's even on wrist.

2 October 2019, 01:38 PM	#5
Finslayer83 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2017 Location: Tennessee Watch: DW-5600 Posts: 1,584	214270 smokes it. Much better than the. 114060 I had - the Explorer is the only 6 digit I like, prefer 5 digit Sub/GMT

2 October 2019, 04:11 PM	#6
CasinoRoyale_007 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2019 Location: NYC/Toronto/CLT Watch: LF Sport & Tissot Posts: 182	How about a 116000 Blue 3 6 9? You can even substitute in explorer hands to make it effectively a blue 36mm explorer with updated bracelet :)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)