ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 May 2016, 06:28 AM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: New York
Watch: GMT & SUB
Posts: 703
|
Heavy 5 digit reference love on the forum! Why?
Good Afternoon. I am a 5 digit owner. Absolutely love my GMT 16710. I think the Pepsi GMT is one of the most beautiful Rolex's a man can own. But from now on I will be solely purchasing 6 digit models, love the upgrades. The newer watches feel much sturdier and of a much higher build quality. (Not taking anything away from the 5 digit models which have stood the test of time and are all icons) Would love to know why my fellow members lust after the 5 digit models over the 6? Thanks!
|
15 May 2016, 07:10 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
You need to own both and make your own decision. Simple as that. I love/own both. Each has pros/cons.
__________________
member#3242 |
15 May 2016, 07:32 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
Watches are already an anachronism, so I don't see much point in pursuing technical upgrades. Plus, I prefer the lighter/sleeker bracelets and the aesthetics of the 5 series (and lower.) The 6 series is too flashy, bold and Omega-like for me, rather than being subtle with more of a vintage vibe like the 5 series.
|
15 May 2016, 07:36 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wales
Watch: 126603
Posts: 2,606
|
I really like both, my first was a 16710 Gmt 2, which I thought I'd have for ever. But since buying a 114060 in 2012 it basically became redundant, I still loved the look but the more solid feel of the 6 digit models just grabbed me, I have recently flipped the 16710 In favour of a 116610LV. I don't see any more 5 digit models in my future. Here's a nice side by side of my 16710 and BLNR
|
15 May 2016, 07:45 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
Quote:
|
|
15 May 2016, 07:48 AM | #6 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: Pepsi GMT
Posts: 2,926
|
Quote:
|
|
15 May 2016, 07:52 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,299
|
^^ But they are both Porsches and both awesome.
For me, for both Porsche and Rolex, I prefer new/recent. When comparing 5 and 6 digit references, 6 will almost always win (GMT being the exception). 4 vs 6? That's more difficult.. |
15 May 2016, 07:54 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
The only improved 'feel' of sturdiness I notice in the newer models is the bracelets.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
15 May 2016, 07:58 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Russell
Location: KC, MO
Watch: FedEx 4 next 1
Posts: 2,244
|
Quote:
('97 air cooled 911TT w/23,237 miles). And I like the vintage Rolex watches more too for their beauty and history! |
|
15 May 2016, 07:59 AM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,013
|
I think you'll see a different kind of love for 4 digits if you went to the Vintage threads. So the impression one gets is based on where you habitually linger here.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
15 May 2016, 08:00 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
Quote:
FWIW, I'm surprised the polls in the other thread came out with the 5 series a little ahead. Based on comments, I would have thought the 6 series would kill the 5 series in favor. I guess it's because new 6 series buyers post more frequently. |
|
15 May 2016, 08:01 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,231
|
Two reasons. First, the 5 digits are in the very recent past, most forum members own these in significant numbers more than any 4 digit or 6 digit reference. Second, the Sport 6's look too bulky to me, in fact, when I wear my 1016 or 1601 for a week and then put my 16610 back on it feels gigantic, couldn't imagine anything bigger. The trend for humongous, oversized watches is nearing its end and the boxy Sport 6's are going to be forever associated with that short trend and not in a good way. |
15 May 2016, 08:01 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
|
15 May 2016, 08:11 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
|
15 May 2016, 08:13 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wales
Watch: 126603
Posts: 2,606
|
|
15 May 2016, 08:17 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,759
|
I think it is a play on retro without paying vintage prices.
|
15 May 2016, 08:18 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
Most important thing on 6 digit Subs for me is more removable links at 6 o'clock. Now I can adjust the bracelet (small wrists) and this is something huge.
|
15 May 2016, 08:27 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
|
15 May 2016, 08:45 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
|
15 May 2016, 09:14 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
|
My spidey-sense tells me that this one has probably been done to death on this and other watch forums.
My reason for preferring the four and five digit references to the six digit ones is that the older ones look like Rolexes to me, and the new ones look like tasteless bling. That's all. |
15 May 2016, 09:21 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
Would agree - pros and cons with both. Little doubt that the six digit models enjoy the latest technology and construction methods but they are not for everyone. Have tried nearly all the six digit sports models and ended up retaining only the SubC. The rest are all four or five digits. Great thing is though that you can still pick up some very nice five digit models that were still in production well into the 2000s so they are still well up to date.
|
15 May 2016, 09:23 AM | #22 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,054
|
|
15 May 2016, 09:23 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
Many here fell in love with Rolex years ago.
The Maxi Dial and Case is just not we care about. For us, I hope I'm not speaking out of turn, Vintage is more important. |
15 May 2016, 09:27 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
|
15 May 2016, 09:29 AM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,757
|
I really prefer the 6 digit, having 2 five digit and 3 six ones, the difference is huge in favour of the 6.
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
15 May 2016, 09:48 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
|
Why is the difference huge in favour of the 6?
The opposite is true, IMO. Aesthetically, there seems to be a "disconnect" between watch case (huge) and bracelet (slim) which once seen, cannot be unseen. And that kills it. |
15 May 2016, 10:04 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: 12,000+ Lakes!
Watch: 16710 Daytona BLNR
Posts: 840
|
Not sure, there seems to be a certain nostalgia brewing in favour of the ¨old School¨ Cases... Dials, etc.
|
15 May 2016, 10:08 AM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,512
|
|
15 May 2016, 10:09 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 29
|
5 digit just fits my wrist better. 6 digit always feels top heavy when on the wrist.
|
15 May 2016, 10:11 AM | #30 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5712
Posts: 2,621
|
A lot of people cannot deal with the larger lugs. It does seem a little less proportionate but more so in photos than on the wrist, IMO.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.