ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
16 May 2016, 12:20 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jeff
Location: CNY
Watch: Daytona 116520
Posts: 927
|
I had a SubDate for 6 years and I recently purchased a Daytona 116520. I haven't looked back since. Love my new watch
Sent from my iPhone 6s Plus using Tapatalk
__________________
.ROLEXROLEX |
16 May 2016, 12:24 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
|
16 May 2016, 12:30 PM | #33 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,097
|
|
16 May 2016, 12:35 PM | #34 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
|
Quote:
|
|
16 May 2016, 12:36 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 3,745
|
Obviously complications have a place, and they can add to the overall aesthetic appeal of a watch. Your example is evidence of that. I'm sure no one would ever say about that VC, 'Gee, if only it didn't have a date. Completely ruined'
I'm not saying all complications ruin watches, rather that on more simple watches the date does often intrude on their otherwise simplistic and clean design. This is often exacerbated by poor date wheel colour choice, awkward date placement on the dial, 'interesting' date fonts and general alignment and/or magnification issues with regards to the date. |
16 May 2016, 03:49 PM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
Quote:
Imagine how clean the dials on some of these watches would be if they didn't bother with the time complication! Just a metal case with a blank dial. |
|
16 May 2016, 03:52 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 3,745
|
|
16 May 2016, 03:55 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
|
16 May 2016, 07:31 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Aris
Location: London, UK
Posts: 191
|
Controversial issue amongst watch enthusiasts for ever...
Depends on how everyone is using their watch. As a device to admire or as a tool? Rolex did become very well known due to their quality, finctionality, endurance and solutions they offered to different problems and situations. Think of the submariner, milgauss, gmt, explorer II etc.... For me personally the option of a date or no date watch in all their line up would be most welcome, similar to the date, no date submariner in the past. What someone likes, someone else might find awful, it is only a matter of taste at the end isn't it? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
16 May 2016, 07:35 PM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cameroun
Watch: GS Snowflake
Posts: 1,534
|
Quote:
That's about the only reason i don't own a Daytona.
__________________
16710 GMT Master II "M" , SD4000, GS Snowflake, Stowa Marine Original. |
|
16 May 2016, 07:42 PM | #41 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: The Office
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 150
|
I sit in front of a laptop 18 hours a day. I have a phone on me 24 hours a day. The date is visible most of the time, how many times a day do you need to check the date anyway. I agree the date is useful and my other Rolex has this, but a Daytona wouldn't look as good with a date window and cyclops. Simple as that really. A sub shouldn't really have the date either, looks better without. As people have said the GMT master is the better choice if date on a sports/tool watch is a must.
|
16 May 2016, 08:11 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,637
|
When I began to primarily wear a watch without a date function, I was concerned about not having that function, but did OK for a couple of years
Then when I switched back to primarily wearing a watch with a date, realized how much more convenient it is to have that feature on a watch Sure, it's not really that hard to be aware of the date each day, and one can get used to doing that, but with our busy lives and seemingly growing number of things to remember (passwords for every account, etc), I've come to prefer having one less thing to be cognizant of throughout the day Yes, it is true that we have phones, laptops, car dashboards, etc. that display the date, but extending that argument, why even wear watches? Far more things around us (stereos, cable boxes, DVD players, microwaves, etc) display the time than the date. I find having a watch for the time and date is most convenient because I always know there is one place I can look to, my wrist, for that information. If I'm in my office vs the living room vs the kitchen vs my car, etc, would have to remember where to look for that information if I didn't wear my watch, and my phone is not with me at all times. Plus, I love looking at my watch! |
16 May 2016, 08:24 PM | #43 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,776
|
The date is not a deal breaker for me. Once I know or think about it I know. The ND Sub is a thing of beauty with a perfectly balanced dial. To each their own.
|
16 May 2016, 10:42 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
|
Friends. As I mentioned previously in this thread, if you really want a date on your Daytona or no date submariner there are ways to create this. On the no date sub you can set the Pearl to the appropriate minute on the dial in the morning (creating a date). On the Daytona you can start the chronograph in the morning and stop it on the days date. This also adds functionality to these pieces as I would guess that the majority do not use the timing bezel and chronograph on a regular basis. Obviously this is not optimal but there are little tricks....so don't let it stop you from buying these beautiful time pieces
Josh |
17 May 2016, 04:41 AM | #45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
Quote:
I think the bottom line is that any complication displayed on a mechanical watch, including the time, can be accessed on something like a cell phone, but that doesn't preclude the mechanical watch's usefulness, as the point of a wrist watch was always to make accessing the time and other functions more conveniently (especially if coming from a pocket watch.) |
|
17 May 2016, 04:54 AM | #46 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: The Office
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 150
|
Let me ask you this, how would you or Rolex add a date to the Daytona? Where would it go and still not significantly change the way this iconic watch looks?
|
17 May 2016, 05:03 AM | #47 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cameroun
Watch: GS Snowflake
Posts: 1,534
|
Quote:
This way for instance.
__________________
16710 GMT Master II "M" , SD4000, GS Snowflake, Stowa Marine Original. |
|
17 May 2016, 06:16 AM | #48 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: The Office
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 150
|
Maybe I am wrong but no Daytona has ever had the Chrono dials in that orientation before? Rolex also never put their logo in that position? You see, it can't be done without drastically changing the watch. The picture you have posted is a chrono yes but not a Rolex nor a Daytona for the reasons I mentioned.
|
17 May 2016, 06:24 AM | #49 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 6,382
|
Quote:
I then promptly missed the appointment for lack of recalling it. In other words, I gotta have my date wheel, man. I look at the date 10-15 times a day. I have other things to remember that aren't on a watch face. (I write all my appointments on Post-It notes, too, before hanging up the phone with my customers, and scotch tape them to my dashboard because I don't trust the adhesive! )
__________________
Craig, The (I'm JUST a) Loxmyth. If I had only known, I would have been a locksmith. — Albert Einstein (1879-1955) TWO FACTOR AUTHENTICATION IS ENABLED. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.